Data
The full database behind every page. Each dataset shows the SQL that produced it; download any of them as CSV. How complete each part is: data quality.
Reviewed scoring choices
SQL
SELECT d.slug AS decision, d.weight_group, d.grouping_reason, m.ref AS motion_ref, dm.role, dm.measure_slug, dm.yes_direction, COALESCE(dm.vote_date, mt.meeting_date) AS vote_date, mt.meeting_date AS source_meeting_date, dm.rationale FROM policy_decision_motion dm JOIN policy_decision d ON d.slug=dm.decision_slug JOIN motion m USING (motion_id) JOIN meeting mt USING (meeting_id) ORDER BY d.decision_date DESC, d.slug
| downtown-green-line-surface-2026 | downtown-green-line-surface-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 135720c31e | primary | 0 | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-22 | Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | |
| housing-strategy-refresh-2026 | housing-strategy-refresh-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 39267cd4ea | primary | 0 | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-22 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| non-market-housing-land-disposition-6-2026 | non-market-land-disposition-round-6-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 8e735b452a | primary | non-market-housing-support | 1 | 2026-07-28 | 2026-07-28 | The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme auth |
| fieldhouse-committee-mandate-2026 | fieldhouse-committee-mandate-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 810c8c6071 | primary | 0 | 2026-06-30 | 2026-06-30 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| nose-creek-trunk-borrowing-2026 | nose-creek-trunk-borrowing-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 122f251321 | context | 0 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | |
| nose-creek-trunk-borrowing-2026 | nose-creek-trunk-borrowing-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 039aa49448 | primary | municipal-borrowing | 1 | 2026-06-30 | 2026-06-30 | The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. |
| public-drug-use-enforcement-report-2026 | public-drug-use-enforcement-framework | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 766cce5c1a | primary | 0 | 2026-06-30 | 2026-06-30 | Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | |
| urban-forestry-reporting-future-funding-2026 | tree-equity-two-billion-trees-program | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | e4362e07d7 | primary | 0 | 2026-06-30 | 2026-06-30 | Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure. | |
| glendale-rcg-2026 | glendale-rcg-2026 | This site-specific application is one family. Its policy approval, amendments and bylaw readings cannot add independent evidence. | a80d08f181 | primary | residential-permissions | -1 | 2026-06-23 | 2026-06-23 | The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. |
| inglewood-hgo-2026 | inglewood-hgo-2026 | This site-specific application is one family. Its policy approval, amendments and bylaw readings cannot add independent evidence. | b5acf3117d | primary | residential-permissions | 1 | 2026-06-23 | 2026-06-23 | The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. |
| downtown-police-hub-study-2026 | downtown-police-hub-study-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 63c6f9e5e2 | primary | 0 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| free-fare-zone-administration-review-2026 | downtown-free-fare-zone-review-2026 | The initial review, deferral and proposed administrative transfer concern one fare-zone process. They remain unscored and cannot become independent rail-investment choices. | d7078220bb | context | 0 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | |
| free-fare-zone-administration-review-2026 | downtown-free-fare-zone-review-2026 | The initial review, deferral and proposed administrative transfer concern one fare-zone process. They remain unscored and cannot become independent rail-investment choices. | 5e2f66f6dc | primary | 0 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | |
| free-fare-zone-deferral-2026 | downtown-free-fare-zone-review-2026 | The initial review, deferral and proposed administrative transfer concern one fare-zone process. They remain unscored and cannot become independent rail-investment choices. | d8d948e03b | context | 0 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | |
| free-fare-zone-deferral-2026 | downtown-free-fare-zone-review-2026 | The initial review, deferral and proposed administrative transfer concern one fare-zone process. They remain unscored and cannot become independent rail-investment choices. | 1a4b4877f6 | primary | 0 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | |
| rescind-climate-emergency-2026 | climate-emergency-declaration | Votes on retaining or rescinding the same declaration share one family, including proposals across Council terms. Related wording and disclosure clauses are not independent commitments. | b826dabe20 | context | 0 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets. | |
| rescind-climate-emergency-2026 | climate-emergency-declaration | Votes on retaining or rescinding the same declaration share one family, including proposals across Council terms. Related wording and disclosure clauses are not independent commitments. | 20d14608da | primary | climate-policy-commitments | -1 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget. |
| rescind-climate-emergency-2026 | climate-emergency-declaration | Votes on retaining or rescinding the same declaration share one family, including proposals across Council terms. Related wording and disclosure clauses are not independent commitments. | 3c277fd19d | context | 0 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision. | |
| safer-together-plan-2026 | safer-together-plan-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 8afa3e276d | primary | community-safety-prevention | 1 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. |
| safer-together-plan-2026 | safer-together-plan-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 831d6b7f21 | context | 0 | 2026-07-28 | 2026-07-28 | Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | |
| safer-together-plan-2026 | safer-together-plan-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 515335f41f | context | 0 | 2026-07-29 | 2026-07-28 | Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote | |
| safer-together-plan-2026 | safer-together-plan-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | bbd33976fe | context | 0 | 2026-05-26 | 2026-05-26 | The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | |
| killarney-hgo-2026 | killarney-hgo-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 00e15bebde | primary | residential-permissions | 1 | 2026-05-12 | 2026-05-12 | The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. |
| transit-transfers-120-minutes-2026 | transit-transfers-120-minutes-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 0f7b9c8af5 | primary | 0 | 2026-04-28 | 2026-04-28 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| transit-transfers-120-minutes-2026 | transit-transfers-120-minutes-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | e7c928ce9a | context | 0 | 2026-02-24 | 2026-02-24 | February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | |
| citywide-rezoning-repeal-2026 | citywide-rezoning-repeal-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | b0cb4ba8a8 | context | 0 | 2025-12-15 | 2025-12-15 | Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | |
| citywide-rezoning-repeal-2026 | citywide-rezoning-repeal-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 74122c7522 | context | 0 | 2025-12-15 | 2025-12-15 | December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | |
| citywide-rezoning-repeal-2026 | citywide-rezoning-repeal-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 9242cfc272 | primary | residential-permissions | -1 | 2026-04-08 | 2026-04-08 | The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. |
| zero-based-review-pilot-2026 | zero-based-review-program | Scoping and the funded pilot are stages of the same review programme. Both remain unscored on borrowing, and neither establishes realized savings. | cb20164569 | primary | 0 | 2026-03-31 | 2026-03-31 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| killarney-32-street-hgo-2026 | killarney-32-street-hgo-2026 | This site-specific application is one family. Its policy approval, amendments and bylaw readings cannot add independent evidence. | c2d74ec564 | primary | residential-permissions | 1 | 2026-03-17 | 2026-03-17 | CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. |
| downtown-free-fare-review-2026 | downtown-free-fare-zone-review-2026 | The initial review, deferral and proposed administrative transfer concern one fare-zone process. They remain unscored and cannot become independent rail-investment choices. | 69752be07e | primary | 0 | 2026-02-24 | 2026-02-24 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| enmax-capital-borrowing-2026 | enmax-capital-borrowing-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 4d5ad1b01a | primary | municipal-borrowing | 1 | 2026-02-24 | 2026-02-24 | This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. |
| forest-lawn-hgo-2026 | forest-lawn-hgo-2026 | This site-specific application is one family. Its policy approval, amendments and bylaw readings cannot add independent evidence. | 25f9955e6a | primary | residential-permissions | 1 | 2026-02-17 | 2026-02-17 | The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. |
| tuxedo-park-hgo-2026 | tuxedo-park-hgo-2026 | This site-specific application is one family. Its policy approval, amendments and bylaw readings cannot add independent evidence. | 2e0c84bb56 | primary | residential-permissions | 0 | 2026-02-17 | 2026-02-17 | Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. |
| tuxedo-park-hgo-2026 | tuxedo-park-hgo-2026 | This site-specific application is one family. Its policy approval, amendments and bylaw readings cannot add independent evidence. | c536b0c423 | context | residential-permissions | 0 | 2026-02-17 | 2026-02-17 | Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. |
| affordable-housing-borrowing-2026 | calgary-housing-expansion-2025-2026 | The acquisition contribution and financing portfolio concern Calgary Housing’s expansion. The public record does not establish independent acquisition scopes, so they conservatively share one family. | fe1b1e803f | primary | non-market-housing-support | 1 | 2026-01-27 | 2026-01-27 | The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. |
| affordable-housing-borrowing-2026 | calgary-housing-expansion-2025-2026 | The acquisition contribution and financing portfolio concern Calgary Housing’s expansion. The public record does not establish independent acquisition scopes, so they conservatively share one family. | 45b25e3256 | context | 0 | 2025-12-15 | 2025-12-15 | The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | |
| affordable-housing-borrowing-2026 | calgary-housing-expansion-2025-2026 | The acquisition contribution and financing portfolio concern Calgary Housing’s expansion. The public record does not establish independent acquisition scopes, so they conservatively share one family. | 5b6cabc06f | context | 0 | 2026-01-27 | 2026-01-27 | The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | |
| vehicle-equipment-borrowing-2026 | vehicle-equipment-borrowing-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 4e3906e2e8 | context | 0 | 2026-01-27 | 2026-01-27 | The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | |
| vehicle-equipment-borrowing-2026 | vehicle-equipment-borrowing-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 728927c995 | context | 0 | 2025-12-15 | 2025-12-15 | First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | |
| vehicle-equipment-borrowing-2026 | vehicle-equipment-borrowing-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | e0eacce356 | primary | municipal-borrowing | 1 | 2026-01-27 | 2026-01-27 | The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. |
| glendale-hgo-2026 | glendale-hgo-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 966bb5babb | primary | residential-permissions | 1 | 2026-01-20 | 2026-01-20 | The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. |
| montgomery-hgo-2026 | montgomery-hgo-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | c966be2080 | primary | residential-permissions | 1 | 2026-01-20 | 2026-01-20 | The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. |
| west-hillhurst-hgo-2026 | west-hillhurst-hgo-2026 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 9ad0ca206c | primary | residential-permissions | 1 | 2026-01-20 | 2026-01-20 | A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. |
| ward-4-mixed-income-acquisition-2025 | calgary-housing-expansion-2025-2026 | The acquisition contribution and financing portfolio concern Calgary Housing’s expansion. The public record does not establish independent acquisition scopes, so they conservatively share one family. | 2ec239da80 | primary | non-market-housing-support | 1 | 2025-12-17 | 2025-12-15 | The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. |
| fireworks-enforcement-outreach-review-2025 | fireworks-enforcement-awareness-review | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | bb6d30e90d | primary | 0 | 2025-12-15 | 2025-12-15 | This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | |
| residential-tax-share-direction-2025 | budget-2026-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 2ebaa92399 | primary | 0 | 2025-12-03 | 2025-12-03 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| zero-based-budget-review-2025 | zero-based-review-program | Scoping and the funded pilot are stages of the same review programme. Both remain unscored on borrowing, and neither establishes realized savings. | 07d766c2e4 | primary | 0 | 2025-12-03 | 2025-12-03 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| climate-environment-budget-reduction-2025 | budget-2026-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 48415999e2 | primary | climate-operating-funding | -1 | 2025-12-02 | 2025-12-02 | A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure. |
| gameplan-facilities-planning-2025 | budget-2026-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 08824bad49 | primary | 0 | 2025-12-02 | 2025-12-02 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| transit-safety-security-outreach-2026 | budget-2026-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 1c1454bbf2 | primary | 0 | 2025-12-02 | 2025-12-02 | The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | |
| transit-service-frequency-funding-2025 | budget-2026-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 27f3cfe286 | primary | 0 | 2025-12-02 | 2025-12-02 | A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | |
| downtown-non-market-conversion-funding-2025 | budget-2026-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 2b265d009f | primary | non-market-housing-support | 1 | 2025-12-01 | 2025-12-01 | The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. |
| mental-health-funding-duration-2026 | budget-2026-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 34980b261d | primary | 0 | 2025-12-01 | 2025-12-01 | Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | |
| police-fleet-helicopter-reserve-2026 | budget-2026-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | f387245801 | primary | 0 | 2025-12-01 | 2025-12-01 | Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | |
| transit-fare-freeze-reversal-2025 | budget-2026-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 7cec42b625 | primary | 0 | 2025-12-01 | 2025-12-01 | The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | |
| retain-climate-emergency-2025 | climate-emergency-declaration | Votes on retaining or rescinding the same declaration share one family, including proposals across Council terms. Related wording and disclosure clauses are not independent commitments. | 76435aaa37 | primary | climate-policy-commitments | -1 | 2025-09-16 | 2025-09-16 | A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes. |
| non-profit-housing-tax-exemption-2025 | non-profit-housing-tax-exemption-2025 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | a1adaca72c | primary | non-market-housing-support | 1 | 2025-01-28 | 2025-01-28 | This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. |
| south-north-rail-program-2025 | south-north-rail-program-2025 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 8760d73b87 | primary | rail-program-investment | 1 | 2025-01-28 | 2025-01-28 | The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. |
| south-north-rail-program-2025 | south-north-rail-program-2025 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 938d13fa16 | context | 0 | 2025-01-28 | 2025-01-28 | The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | |
| community-safety-investment-2024 | budget-2025-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 88adc02dc1 | context | 0 | 2024-11-21 | 2024-11-21 | This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | |
| community-safety-investment-2024 | budget-2025-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | 0f0cf15356 | primary | community-safety-prevention | 1 | 2024-11-21 | 2024-11-21 | The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. |
| community-safety-investment-2024 | budget-2025-adjustments | Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight. | eebe2beb35 | context | 0 | 2024-11-21 | 2024-11-21 | The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | |
| green-line-wind-down-2024 | green-line-wind-down-2024 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | caf4ae9a20 | primary | 0 | 2024-09-17 | 2024-09-17 | The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | |
| green-line-wind-down-2024 | green-line-wind-down-2024 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | e7812aa68a | context | 0 | 2024-09-17 | 2024-09-17 | An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | |
| green-line-rebase-2024 | green-line-rebase-2024 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 8fb37da7c5 | context | 0 | 2024-07-30 | 2024-07-30 | Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | |
| green-line-rebase-2024 | green-line-rebase-2024 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 9a773266bf | primary | rail-program-investment | 1 | 2024-07-30 | 2024-07-30 | This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. |
| green-line-rebase-2024 | green-line-rebase-2024 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 28abaab0c8 | context | 0 | 2024-07-30 | 2024-07-30 | Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | |
| greenfield-townhouse-permit-review-2024 | greenfield-townhouse-permit-review-2024 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 2d785377e2 | primary | 0 | 2024-06-18 | 2024-06-18 | This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | |
| home-is-here-2023 | housing-strategy-2023 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | a91b94a508 | primary | 0 | 2023-09-16 | 2023-09-16 | This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | |
| event-centre-agreement-2023 | event-centre-2023 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | 5084cc4a67 | primary | event-centre-funding | 1 | 2023-04-25 | 2023-04-25 | Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label. |
| climate-strategy-2022 | climate-pathways-2050-framework | The target/reporting direction and subsequent Pathways-to-2050 strategy are phases of one climate framework. They share one family rather than becoming two independent policy commitments. | 6d4a10ca71 | primary | climate-policy-commitments | 1 | 2022-07-05 | 2022-07-05 | The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores. |
| climate-strategy-2022 | climate-pathways-2050-framework | The target/reporting direction and subsequent Pathways-to-2050 strategy are phases of one climate framework. They share one family rather than becoming two independent policy commitments. | 3286b38bd1 | context | 0 | 2022-07-05 | 2022-07-05 | Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate. | |
| climate-net-zero-target-2021 | climate-pathways-2050-framework | The target/reporting direction and subsequent Pathways-to-2050 strategy are phases of one climate framework. They share one family rather than becoming two independent policy commitments. | 3c69f83a43 | primary | climate-policy-commitments | 1 | 2021-12-20 | 2021-12-20 | The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements. |
| event-centre-extra-capital-2021 | event-centre-2021 | This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight. | db16c22b35 | primary | event-centre-funding | 1 | 2021-07-26 | 2021-07-26 | The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project. |
The row filter and sorting apply to the preview only; CSV downloads include every row. Text that could run as a spreadsheet formula is prefixed with an apostrophe for safety; numeric values retain their original value. The preview and source database retain the original text.