Climate & environment

Formal municipal climate commitments, targets and strategy decisions, alongside their separate spending and implementation records. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.

Policy measure

People shown

Focus on a person

From

Through

Reset filters

Reviewed decisions

Sourced statements

Evidence last reviewed

Oct 30, 2026

Formal municipal climate commitments

Reviewed decisions establishing or rescinding municipal climate targets, strategies and declarations. A declaration vote is not evidence of a particular dollar amount or emissions outcome.

Favoured fewer formal commitmentsFavoured more formal commitments

Myke Atkinson

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Andre Chabot

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Harrison Clark

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Raj Dhaliwal

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Jeromy Farkas

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Mike Jamieson

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Landon Johnston

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

DJ Kelly

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Dan McLean

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

John Pantazopoulos

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Nathaniel Schmidt

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Kim Tyers

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Rob Ward

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Jennifer Wyness

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Andrew Yule

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

View chart data

Policy positions

15 rows

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Myke Atkinson	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Andre Chabot	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Harrison Clark	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Raj Dhaliwal	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Jeromy Farkas	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Mike Jamieson	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Landon Johnston	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
DJ Kelly	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Dan McLean	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
John Pantazopoulos	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Nathaniel Schmidt	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Kim Tyers	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Rob Ward	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Jennifer Wyness	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026
Andrew Yule	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	May 26, 2026	May 26, 2026

Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Decisions and alternatives

Jun 30, 2026 · adopted

Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding

Council received the tree-equity program update, required annual forestry metrics and directed consideration of future capital funding tied to canopy targets and federal tree-program obligations.

Outcome: Council adopted the directions unanimously. The motion required consideration of 2027–2030 capital funding; it did not approve that funding or prove that canopy targets were reached.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026

May 26, 2026 · adopted

Rescind the climate emergency declaration

Council again considered immediately rescinding its November 2021 climate emergency declaration.

Outcome: Council carried rescission. A separate proposal to remove future references from official materials was defeated.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Dec 2, 2025 · adopted

Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending

A 2026 budget amendment proposed removing $9 million in one-time Climate and Environment operating expenditures from the Planning and Development Services budget.

Outcome: Council adopted the reduction. This amendment changes a specified operating allocation; it does not rescind every climate policy or establish a measured emissions impact.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Position evidence and history

Date	Person	Decision	Recorded vote	Meaning and scoring rationale	Use
Jun 30, 2026	Andre Chabot	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Andrew Yule	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Dan McLean	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	DJ Kelly	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Harrison Clark	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Kim Tyers	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Landon Johnston	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Rob Ward	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Andre Chabot	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Andrew Yule	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Dan McLean	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	DJ Kelly	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Harrison Clark	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Jennifer Wyness	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Jeromy Farkas	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	John Pantazopoulos	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Kim Tyers	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Landon Johnston	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Mike Jamieson	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Myke Atkinson	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Nathaniel Schmidt	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Raj Dhaliwal	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Rob Ward	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice

Recorded choices remain attached to their proposals. Contextual motions are visible and unscored.

How the record developed

Date	Person	Record type	Choice or statement	Source
Oct 29, 2026	Harrison Clark	Outcome not verified	Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.	Milestone source
Jun 30, 2026	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 27, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Vote explanation	Opposed rescinding the declaration, citing little practical benefit and risks to funding relationships. Decision evidence Recorded roll call Watch the explanation	Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 4, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Vote explanation	Supported water conservation rules to protect drinking-water reliability and reduce demand pressures. Recorded roll call	Schmidt: vote explanations, May 4, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
February 2026	Kim Tyers	Vote explanation	Explained supporting a $9 million climate-budget reduction, preferring spending on roads, emergency services and infrastructure. Decision evidence Recorded roll call	Tyers: February 2026 newsletter · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 8, 2025	Andrew Yule	Vote explanation	Opposed the $9 million climate-budget reduction, concerned that cuts would affect oversubscribed household water and energy-efficiency programs. Decision evidence Recorded roll call	Yule budget explanation, December 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
December 2025	Mike Jamieson	Vote explanation	Supported the $9 million climate-allocation cut because he considered it insufficiently connected to core municipal responsibilities, while supporting weather-resilient infrastructure. Decision evidence Recorded roll call	Jamieson budget rationale, pages 3–4 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
2025	Landon Johnston	Stated position	Rejected a climate-emergency declaration and net-zero commitment, favouring practical efficiencies that demonstrably save money.	Question 13 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Undated source	Harrison Clark	Campaign commitment	Increase Ward 9's tree-planting target to 1,000 trees per year.	Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Attributed statements, recorded choices and campaign commitments retain separate labels. Month/year dates retain their precision; undated records appear last. Promises show their full lifecycle.

Statements and reasons for votes

Explanation of vote · May 27, 2026 · Nathaniel Schmidt

Opposed rescinding the declaration, citing little practical benefit and risks to funding relationships.

Decision evidence Recorded roll call Watch the explanation

Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026