Climate & environment

Formal municipal climate commitments, targets and strategy decisions, alongside their separate spending and implementation records. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.

Policy measure

People shown

Focus on a person

From

Through

Reset filters

Reviewed decisions

Sourced statements

Evidence last reviewed

Oct 30, 2026

Climate and Environment operating allocations

Explicit amendments to Climate and Environment operating allocations. This is separate from formal targets and declarations; multiple amendments within one annual budget share one scoring weight.

Favoured the reviewed funding reductionsFavoured retaining the reviewed allocations

Myke Atkinson

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Andre Chabot

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Harrison Clark

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Raj Dhaliwal

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Jeromy Farkas

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Mike Jamieson

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Landon Johnston

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

DJ Kelly

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Dan McLean

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

John Pantazopoulos

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Nathaniel Schmidt

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Kim Tyers

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Rob Ward

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Jennifer Wyness

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

Andrew Yule

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

View chart data

Policy positions

15 rows

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Myke Atkinson	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Andre Chabot	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Harrison Clark	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Raj Dhaliwal	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Jeromy Farkas	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Mike Jamieson	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Landon Johnston	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
DJ Kelly	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Dan McLean	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
John Pantazopoulos	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Nathaniel Schmidt	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Kim Tyers	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Rob Ward	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Jennifer Wyness	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025
Andrew Yule	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Dec 2, 2025	Dec 2, 2025

Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Decisions and alternatives

Jun 30, 2026 · adopted

Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding

Council received the tree-equity program update, required annual forestry metrics and directed consideration of future capital funding tied to canopy targets and federal tree-program obligations.

Outcome: Council adopted the directions unanimously. The motion required consideration of 2027–2030 capital funding; it did not approve that funding or prove that canopy targets were reached.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026

May 26, 2026 · adopted

Rescind the climate emergency declaration

Council again considered immediately rescinding its November 2021 climate emergency declaration.

Outcome: Council carried rescission. A separate proposal to remove future references from official materials was defeated.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Dec 2, 2025 · adopted

Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending

A 2026 budget amendment proposed removing $9 million in one-time Climate and Environment operating expenditures from the Planning and Development Services budget.

Outcome: Council adopted the reduction. This amendment changes a specified operating allocation; it does not rescind every climate policy or establish a measured emissions impact.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Sep 16, 2025 · not_adopted

Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration

A motion proposed immediately rescinding Council's climate emergency declaration.

Outcome: The rescission proposal was defeated, so the declaration remained after this vote. Council reconsidered the policy in 2026.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Jul 5, 2022 · adopted

Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050

Council considered the updated climate strategy, replacing the 2018 resilience plans and adding accountability provisions.

Outcome: Council adopted the updated strategy. This is policy approval rather than proof that its targets were achieved.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026

Dec 20, 2021 · adopted

Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting

Council directed a net-zero-by-2050 target, sector-specific interim targets, reporting on climate actions and spending, and work on City buildings.

Outcome: Council adopted the directions. Targets and reporting requirements do not by themselves establish achieved emissions reductions.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026

Position evidence and history

Date	Person	Decision	Recorded vote	Meaning and scoring rationale	Use
Jun 30, 2026	Andre Chabot	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Andrew Yule	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Dan McLean	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	DJ Kelly	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Harrison Clark	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Kim Tyers	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Landon Johnston	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026	Rob Ward	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding	Yes	Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations. Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	No	Keep the declaration by rejecting this rescission motion. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	Context / unscored
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Rescind the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Andre Chabot	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Andrew Yule	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Dan McLean	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	DJ Kelly	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Harrison Clark	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Jennifer Wyness	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Jeromy Farkas	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	John Pantazopoulos	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Kim Tyers	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Landon Johnston	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Mike Jamieson	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Myke Atkinson	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Nathaniel Schmidt	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	No	Reject this particular reduction and retain the proposed allocation at this amendment stage. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Raj Dhaliwal	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 2, 2025	Rob Ward	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending	Yes	Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million. A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Andre Chabot	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Courtney Walcott	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Dan McLean	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Evan Spencer	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Gian-Carlo Carra	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Jasmine Mian	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Jennifer Wyness	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Jyoti Gondek	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Kourtney Penner	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Peter Demong	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Raj Dhaliwal	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Sean Chu	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Sonya Sharp	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	Yes	Rescind the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Sep 16, 2025	Terry Wong	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration	No	Reject rescission at this vote and retain the declaration. A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Andre Chabot	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Andre Chabot	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Courtney Walcott	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Courtney Walcott	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Dan McLean	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Dan McLean	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Evan Spencer	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Evan Spencer	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Gian-Carlo Carra	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Gian-Carlo Carra	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Jasmine Mian	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Jasmine Mian	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Jennifer Wyness	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Jennifer Wyness	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Jyoti Gondek	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Jyoti Gondek	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Kourtney Penner	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Kourtney Penner	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Peter Demong	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Peter Demong	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Raj Dhaliwal	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Raj Dhaliwal	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Richard Pootmans	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Richard Pootmans	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Sean Chu	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Sean Chu	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Sonya Sharp	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Sonya Sharp	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	No	Reject the updated strategy package. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Jul 5, 2022	Terry Wong	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	Reviewed policy choice
Jul 5, 2022	Terry Wong	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050	Yes	Adopt the updated climate strategy and stated audit and advisory directions. Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	Context / unscored
Dec 20, 2021	Andre Chabot	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	No	Reject this package of climate-target and reporting directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Courtney Walcott	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Dan McLean	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	No	Reject this package of climate-target and reporting directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Evan Spencer	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Gian-Carlo Carra	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Jasmine Mian	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Jennifer Wyness	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Jyoti Gondek	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Kourtney Penner	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Peter Demong	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Raj Dhaliwal	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Richard Pootmans	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Sean Chu	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	No	Reject this package of climate-target and reporting directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Sonya Sharp	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice
Dec 20, 2021	Terry Wong	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting	Yes	Adopt the target and accountability directions. The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	Reviewed policy choice

Recorded choices remain attached to their proposals. Contextual motions are visible and unscored.

How the record developed

Date / precision	Person	Record type	Choice or statement	Source
Oct 29, 2026	Harrison Clark	Outcome not verified	Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.	Milestone source
Jun 30, 2026	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Require forestry reporting and consider future tree-program funding · Yes Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.	Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 27, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Vote explanation	Opposed rescinding the declaration, citing little practical benefit and risks to funding relationships. Decision evidence Recorded roll call Watch the explanation	Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · No The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes A separate unsuccessful direction concerned references in City materials and is not another scored declaration decision.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The accompanying climate-expenditure portal direction concerns transparency and is not treated as support for or opposition to climate targets.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Rescind the climate emergency declaration · Yes The scored question removes a formal declaration; it does not itself repeal all climate policies or cut a quantified climate budget.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 4, 2026	Nathaniel Schmidt	Vote explanation	Supported water conservation rules to protect drinking-water reliability and reduce demand pressures. Recorded roll call	Schmidt: vote explanations, May 4, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
February 2026	Kim Tyers	Vote explanation	Explained supporting a $9 million climate-budget reduction, preferring spending on roads, emergency services and infrastructure. Decision evidence Recorded roll call	Tyers: February 2026 newsletter · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 8, 2025	Andrew Yule	Vote explanation	Opposed the $9 million climate-budget reduction, concerned that cuts would affect oversubscribed household water and energy-efficiency programs. Decision evidence Recorded roll call	Yule budget explanation, December 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Andrew Yule	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	DJ Kelly	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Harrison Clark	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Jeromy Farkas	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	John Pantazopoulos	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Kim Tyers	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Landon Johnston	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Mike Jamieson	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Myke Atkinson	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Nathaniel Schmidt	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · No A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025	Rob Ward	Recorded vote	Reduce Climate and Environment one-time operating spending · Yes A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes, C2025-0901, December 2 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
December 2025	Mike Jamieson	Vote explanation	Supported the $9 million climate-allocation cut because he considered it insufficiently connected to core municipal responsibilities, while supporting weather-resilient infrastructure. Decision evidence Recorded roll call	Jamieson budget rationale, pages 3–4 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Oct 1, 2025	Raj Dhaliwal	Stated position	Advocated further tree-canopy expansion in Ward 5, saying planting progress was insufficient.	Dhaliwal dated tree-canopy update · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · Yes A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Courtney Walcott	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · Yes A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Evan Spencer	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Gian-Carlo Carra	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Jasmine Mian	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Jyoti Gondek	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Kourtney Penner	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Peter Demong	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Sean Chu	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · Yes A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Sonya Sharp	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · Yes A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Sep 16, 2025	Terry Wong	Recorded vote	Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
2025	Landon Johnston	Stated position	Rejected a climate-emergency declaration and net-zero commitment, favouring practical efficiencies that demonstrably save money.	Question 13 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Courtney Walcott	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Courtney Walcott	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Evan Spencer	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Evan Spencer	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Gian-Carlo Carra	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Gian-Carlo Carra	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Jasmine Mian	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Jasmine Mian	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Jyoti Gondek	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Jyoti Gondek	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Kourtney Penner	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Kourtney Penner	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Peter Demong	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Peter Demong	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Richard Pootmans	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Richard Pootmans	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Sean Chu	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Sean Chu	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Sonya Sharp	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Sonya Sharp	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · No Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Terry Wong	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 5, 2022	Terry Wong	Recorded vote	Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Andre Chabot	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · No The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Courtney Walcott	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Dan McLean	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · No The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Evan Spencer	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Gian-Carlo Carra	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Jasmine Mian	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Jennifer Wyness	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Jyoti Gondek	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Kourtney Penner	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Peter Demong	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Raj Dhaliwal	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Richard Pootmans	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Sean Chu	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · No The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Sonya Sharp	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 20, 2021	Terry Wong	Recorded vote	Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements.	City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Undated source	Myke Atkinson	Stated position	Supported flood and drought resilience, more trees, building retrofits and community renewable energy.	Atkinson: campaign priorities (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Undated source	Harrison Clark	Stated position	Proposed planting 1,000 trees annually in Ward 9, prioritizing areas exposed to flooding and extreme heat.	Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Undated source	Harrison Clark	Campaign commitment	Increase Ward 9's tree-planting target to 1,000 trees per year.	Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Attributed statements, recorded choices and campaign commitments retain separate labels. Month/year dates retain their precision; undated records appear last. Promises show their full lifecycle.

Statements and reasons for votes

Explanation of vote · May 27, 2026 · Nathaniel Schmidt

Opposed rescinding the declaration, citing little practical benefit and risks to funding relationships.

Decision evidence Recorded roll call Watch the explanation

Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026