Peter Demong
Former councillor. Ran for councillor in 2010, 2013, 2017 and 2021.
Elections contested
4
Won
4
Votes received
71,150
all races combined
Council terms
4
2010–2013, 2013–2017, 2017–2021, 2021–2025
Council votes recorded
6,109
since 2010 (roll calls before 2021)
Raised for 2021
$48,261
spent $76,843
Record
View chart data
Chart values
8 rows| Office | Record |
|---|---|
| Ward 14 councillor | Councillor, Ward 14, 2010–2013 |
| Ward 14 councillor | Councillor, Ward 14, 2013–2017 |
| Ward 14 councillor | Councillor, Ward 14, 2017–2021 |
| Ward 14 councillor | Councillor, Ward 14, 2021–2025 |
| Ward 14 councillor | 2010 Ward 14 councillor: 28.9%, won |
| Ward 14 councillor | 2013 Ward 14 councillor: 67.1%, won |
| Ward 14 councillor | 2017 Ward 14 councillor: 90.3%, won |
| Ward 14 councillor | 2021 Ward 14 councillor: 65.6%, won |
Bars are terms on council; diamonds are elections (filled = won). Records start with the 2010 election.
Elections
| Year | Race | Votes | Share | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Ward 14 councillor | 20,412 | 65.6% | ElectedIncumbent |
| 2017 | Ward 14 councillor | 28,430 | 90.3% | ElectedIncumbent |
| 2013 | Ward 14 councillor | 13,974 | 67.1% | ElectedIncumbent |
| 2010 | Ward 14 councillor | 8,334 | 28.9% | Elected |
Official results, City of Calgary Open Data (sources). Share is of all votes cast in the race; affiliations appear from 2025, the first election with municipal parties.
Name as recorded
| Source | Spelling |
|---|---|
| Ballot | Demong, Peter |
| Ballot | DEMONG, Peter |
| Ballot | PETER DEMONG |
| Vote record | Peter Demong |
| Disclosure | DEMONG, Peter |
| Disclosure | Peter Demong |
Spellings matched to this person across sources. See About for how names are resolved.
Issue positions
Explore the issues and policy measures or compare this person.
Advancing the Green Line rail program
Explicit approvals to advance the Green Line program. Choices between two rail alignments and a wind-down after another government's funding withdrawal are explained separately and do not automatically count as opposition to rail.
Opposed the reviewed advancement proposalsSupported the reviewed advancement proposals
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Demong | 100 | 2 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jul 30, 2024 | Jan 28, 2025 |
Broader residential permissions
Reviewed land-use decisions where the direction of residential building permissions is explicit. Broader permission does not establish that a home was built. Contextual amendments do not each become another independent score.
Favoured narrower permissionsFavoured broader permissions
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Demong | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Capital borrowing authorizations
Final readings of specified capital borrowing bylaws. This is a record of support for these particular debt-financed projects, not a general tax, spending or fiscal-conservatism score; utility-supported and tax-supported debt may differ.
Opposed the reviewed borrowing authoritiesSupported the reviewed borrowing authorities
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Demong | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Climate and Environment operating allocations
Explicit amendments to Climate and Environment operating allocations. This is separate from formal targets and declarations; multiple amendments within one annual budget share one scoring weight.
Favoured the reviewed funding reductionsFavoured retaining the reviewed allocations
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Demong | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Community-based safety responses
Explicit funding or plan approvals for community-based prevention and wellbeing responses. This measure makes no claim about a member's position on every police budget or the effectiveness of an adopted plan.
Opposed the reviewed community-safety proposalsSupported the reviewed community-safety proposals
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Demong | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Nov 21, 2024 | Nov 21, 2024 |
Formal municipal climate commitments
Reviewed decisions establishing or rescinding municipal climate targets, strategies and declarations. A declaration vote is not evidence of a particular dollar amount or emissions outcome.
Favoured fewer formal commitmentsFavoured more formal commitments
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Demong | 100 | 2 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Dec 20, 2021 | Sep 16, 2025 |
Public funding for the Event Centre
Specific public financial commitments to the Event Centre project, including the original project and the replacement agreement. These are different proposals across time; a vote is not a generic position on all major projects.
Opposed the reviewed public commitmentsSupported the reviewed public commitments
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Demong | 100 | 2 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jul 26, 2021 | Apr 25, 2023 |
Public support for non-market housing
Reviewed decisions that provide a specific financial or tax benefit for non-market housing. A vote records a choice on that proposal, not an estimate of affordability outcomes or an overall housing ideology.
Opposed the reviewed support proposalsSupported the reviewed support proposals
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Demong | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Jan 28, 2025 | Jan 28, 2025 |
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.
Policy choices over time
| Date / precision | Person | Record type | Choice or statement | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2025 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Consider rescinding the climate emergency declaration · No A Yes removes a formal declaration; a No retains it. Audit proposals do not become extra climate-position votes. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · No This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Apr 25, 2023 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label. | Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 5, 2022 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes The primary vote adopts the updated climate strategy; its amendments and related recommendations are not separate scores. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 5, 2022 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Adopt Calgary Climate Strategy: Pathways to 2050 · Yes Related clean-electricity recommendations explain part of the same strategy debate. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 20, 2021 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Set net-zero targets and climate expenditure reporting · Yes The vote explicitly strengthens formal municipal climate commitments through a net-zero target and implementation-reporting requirements. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 26, 2021 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · Yes The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
Votes, statements, promises and action milestones retain distinct labels. Dates preserve source precision; undated records appear last. Different proposals can explain different choices; a changed vote is not automatically a changed belief.
Statements and reasons for votes
No sourced statements collected
This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.
Published statements are attributed to their author and kept separate from recorded votes.
Promises and actions
No sourced commitments collected
A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.
Milestones describe the evidence collected. Adoption, an individual vote and implementation are different events; a missing milestone is not proof that a promise was broken.
Policy leadership
No documented leadership entries collected
Sponsorship and committee appointments require an explicit source; a Yes vote alone does not establish either.
Appointment records do not establish continued service beyond their sourced term. Authorship and sponsorship require explicit documentation.
Voting record
| Council | Votes cast | On split votes | Participation | Against the result* | Same vote as mayor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–2025 council | 1,270 | 632 | 90.8% | 16.3% | 87.3% |
| 2017–2021 council | 1,439 | 1,108 | 93.4% | 38.3% | 64.5% |
| 2013–2017 council (roll calls) | 1,336 | 1,327 | 88.8% | 31.0% | 41.5% |
| 2010–2013 council (roll calls) | 778 | 775 | 98.5% | 39.7% | 49.9% |
Vote counts and agreement here use Council meetings, with procedural motions excluded. A missing vote counts as not participating because absences are rarely recorded. *On split (non-unanimous) motions. Rows marked roll calls (and 2017–21 votes before 2021): Before 2021 a member's vote is on record only when Council took a roll call, which the minutes print; those are the votes a member asked to record, mostly contested ones. Committee votes before October 2020 are not included.
Votes the same way as…
View chart data
Chart values
14 rows| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Evan Spencer | 90% |
| Richard Pootmans | 90% |
| Jasmine Mian | 88% |
| Kourtney Penner | 88% |
| Jyoti Gondek | 87% |
| Courtney Walcott | 87% |
| Raj Dhaliwal | 87% |
| Gian-Carlo Carra | 85% |
| Jennifer Wyness | 85% |
| Terry Wong | 84% |
| Sonya Sharp | 84% |
| Andre Chabot | 78% |
| Dan McLean | 77% |
| Sean Chu | 72% |
Share of Council-meeting motions both members voted on where they cast the same vote (procedural motions excluded).
Votes by topic
NoYes
View chart data
Chart values
13 rows| Topic | No | Yes |
|---|---|---|
| Planning & land use | 741 | 1562 |
| Budget, taxes & finance | 258 | 568 |
| Transit & transportation | 184 | 306 |
| Governance & council | 94 | 263 |
| Other | 96 | 211 |
| Social & community services | 39 | 89 |
| Economy & business | 28 | 97 |
| Housing & affordability | 36 | 78 |
| Public health | 9 | 61 |
| Environment, water & climate | 18 | 36 |
| Public safety & policing | 6 | 40 |
| Arts, culture, sport & events | 13 | 32 |
| Intergovernmental | 4 | 10 |
Council and committee votes; procedural motions excluded. Topics come from keyword rules applied to the motion text.
Vote record
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0859
Council direct Administration to conduct a comprehensive value for money audit of all City climate-related spending, including operating and capital expenditures tied to the Climate Emergency declaration and subsequent climate strategies, across all business units and departments, ;and return to Council no later than 2025 December 15 through Executive Committee ;to confirm cost, timing, internal or external auditor and scope, where the scope considers the following: a. A full accounting of annual climate-related expenditures since the declaration of a Climate Emergency in November 2021;
Voted NoDefeated6–8
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0858
Council direct Administration to: Grant an exemption to the United Place building from the requirement in Section 2.1 of the Downtown Calgary Development Incentive Program Terms of Reference that eligible properties must be currently classified by The City of Calgary as commercial office use and non-residential property for assessment and tax purposes. Consider and evaluate an application submitted for the conversion of the United Place building to residential units in future round(s) of the Downtown Calgary Development Incentive Program pursuant to the Programs Terms of Reference, provided that the application and proposed project meet all requirements of the Program (other than the property classification requirement referenced in Statement 1 of this Notice of Motion above) and pass reasonable due diligence conducted by Administration. Evaluate any application submitted for the conversion of the United Place building to residential units against any and all other conversion project applications submitted during that round of the Program and that only the highest scoring applications, as determined by Administration in its sole discretion, will be recommended for approval.
Voted YesCarried11–3
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0856
Council direct Administration to: Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 with: a. A summary of potential municipal, provincial, and federal rule changes that would allow more authority for peace officers to seize, transport, and dispose of unknown substances; ;
Voted YesCarried10–4
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0859
Council direct Administration to conduct a comprehensive value for money audit of all City climate-related spending, including operating and capital expenditures tied to the Climate Emergency declaration and subsequent climate strategies, across all business units and departments, ;and return to Council no later than 2025 December 15 through Executive Committee ;to confirm cost, timing, internal or external auditor and scope, where the scope considers the following: c. Identification of cost savings, duplications, or expenditures not delivering measurable benefits;
Voted NoDefeated7–7
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0856
Council direct Administration to: Work with the Mayor to send a letter to the provincial Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Services as soon as possible to request an expedited process for providing transit and peace officers with enhanced authority to seize, transport, and dispose of unknown substances.
Voted YesCarried10–4
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0859
Direct the City Clerk's Office to distribute the letter from the Climate Advisory Committee with respect to Item 9.4.6, Notice of Motion - Rescinding climate emergency, value for money audit and climate strategy spending, EC2025-0859 and add it to the Corporate Record.
Voted YesCarried13–1
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0839
That Council give three readings to Proposed Bylaw 46M2025 as proposed in Attachment 2. ;
Voted YesCarried9–5
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0859
Council direct Administration to conduct a comprehensive value for money audit of all City climate-related spending, including operating and capital expenditures tied to the Climate Emergency declaration and subsequent climate strategies, across all business units and departments, ;and return to Council no later than 2025 December 15 through Executive Committee ;to confirm cost, timing, internal or external auditor and scope, where the scope considers the following: b. An assessment of whether spending outcomes are aligned with Councils jurisdiction and priorities;
Voted NoDefeated7–7
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0857
Council direct Administration to: Consider the $7.5 million required for the residential conversion of the Barron Building a high priority need and include a new ask for one-time funding in the 2026 Budget Document for Council approval. Subject to the $7.5 million of one-time funding described above being approved, and notwithstanding any dates or deadlines to the contrary in the Program Terms of Reference: (a) establish and implement a time-frame to accept applications for the Program, and (b) if an application is approved, negotiate a funding agreement with the successful applicant (if any). Conduct reasonable due diligence on all applicants to the Program which an applicant must pass to be eligible for Program funding and which will inform the evaluation of application.
Voted YesCarried11–3
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0859
Council immediately rescind the Climate Emergency declaration;
Voted NoDefeated4–10
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0859
Council direct Administration to conduct a comprehensive value for money audit of all City climate-related spending, including operating and capital expenditures tied to the Climate Emergency declaration and subsequent climate strategies, across all business units and departments, ;and return to Council no later than 2025 December 15 through Executive Committee ;to confirm cost, timing, internal or external auditor and scope, where the scope considers the following: d. Recommendations for how climate-related spending can be better aligned with core municipal responsibilities and financial sustainability;
Voted NoDefeated6–8
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0856
That Recommendations 3, 4 and 5 be inserted as follows: Work with the Mayor to send a letter to the provincial Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Services as soon as possible to request an expedited process for providing transit and peace officers with enhanced authority to seize, transport, and dispose of unknown substances.
Voted YesCarried10–4
Sep 16, 2025
C2025-0828
That Council give second and third readings to proposed Bylaws 39M2025 and 7B2025.
Voted NoCarried12–1
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0856
That Recommendations 3, 4 and 5 be inserted as follows: 3. Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 with: b. An analysis of the approaches taken by other Canadian municipalities who have sought to ban open drug use, as well as court diversion programs including but not limited to, community courts; and c. A summary of Calgary's current Community Court partnership and funding model, as well as any anticipated changes to the delivery and/or funding models. 4. Prepare: ; a. a submission for the 2026 annual budget adjustment process in November 2025 to sustainably fund Community Court from base budget at the current level of service; and b. a proposal to sustainably fund an expanded Community Court scope that may include open drug use violations and weapons offenses for a pilot program in 2026, as well as continued funding for the 2027-2030 budget process.
Voted YesCarried9–5
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0859
Administration report the results publicly ;to Council no later than 2026 September to inform the 2026 November budget deliberations on the 2027-2030 Service Plans and Budgets, with clear, plain language explanations of climate-related expenditures and recommendations, so that Council and Calgarians can evaluate whether climate spending provides value for money.
Voted NoDefeated6–8
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0856
That Recommendations 3, 4 and 5 be inserted as follows: 3. Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 ;with: a. A summary of potential municipal, provincial, and federal rule changes that would allow more authority for peace officers to seize, transport, and dispose of unknown substances;
Voted YesCarried12–2
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0856
Council direct Administration to: Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 with: b. An analysis of the approaches taken by other Canadian municipalities who have sought to ban open drug use, as well as court diversion programs including but not limited to, community courts; and c. A summary of Calgary's current Community Court partnership and funding model, as well as any anticipated changes to the delivery and/or funding models. Prepare: ; a. a submission for the 2026 annual budget adjustment process in November 2025 to sustainably fund Community Court from base budget at the current level of service; and b. a proposal to sustainably fund an expanded Community Court scope that may include open drug use violations and weapons offences for a pilot program in 2026, as well as continued funding for the 2027-2030 budget process.
Voted YesCarried10–4
Sep 16, 2025
EC2025-0856
Council direct Administration to: Bring a report to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 January that considers more punitive fines for the open display of weapons, potentially including: a. a base fine higher than the current $250; b. different fine amounts for different types of weapons, informed by their varying potential to intimidate the public; and c. escalating fine amounts for repeat offenders. Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 with: a. An investigation of potential municipal, provincial, and federal rule changes that would allow more flexibility for peace officers to seize, transport, and dispose of weapons; and b. An analysis of the approaches taken by other Canadian municipalities who have sought to ban certain types of weapons and their applicability to Calgary
Voted YesCarried12–2
Jul 29, 2025
EC2025-0748
That new Recommendations 1 and 2 as follows, be inserted and the remaining Recommendations be renumbered accordingly: 1. Forward this Notice of Motion, and the map of the ;Proposed Annexation Area in Attachment 1, to Foothills County Council and request a letter no later than September 12, 2025 from the Reeve on behalf of Council stating their agreement with what is proposed; 2.Upon receipt of a letter from Foothills County consenting to this annexation, submit the same to the Minister of Municipal Affairs requesting an annexation process that cuts red tape and expedites approvals based on mutual agreement for an annexation between the City of Calgary and Foothills County; That renumbered Recommendation 3 (original Recommendation 1) be amended by inserting the words Upon receipt of a confirmation letter for annexation from the Minister of Municipal Affairs, formally prior to the words notify Foothills County, the Land and Property Rights Tribunal. That renumbered Recommendation 4 (original Recommendation 2) be amended by inserting the words and consider any adjacent lands that would strengthen the delivery of housing and services in the proposed area following the words outlining options and potential processes for the annexation, and That renumbered Recommendation 5 (original Recommendation 3) be amended by deleting the words Q1 2026 prior to the words no later than and replacing with the words Q2 2026.
Voted YesDefeated7–7
Jul 29, 2025
EC2025-0761
That with respect to ;Revised Notice of Motion EC2025-0761, the following be adopted, after amendment: Therefore be it Resolved that Council directs Administration to allocate $7M of one-time funding from the Housing Accelerator Funds to further fund the Shallow Utility Burial Pilot Program starting in 2025; and Further be it resolved that Council directs Administration to assess the pilot program and consider a future funding source for a permanent Shallow Utility Burial Program in the prioritization of investments for the 2025 November Budget Adjustments or future Service Plans and Budgets. ;
Voted YesCarried11–3
Jul 29, 2025
EC2025-0750
That Council direct Administration: To leverage the existing criteria-based evaluation from the intake process for ASP amendments and new ASPs, and create a sequential ASP Workplan (meaning an approval new or amended ASP will start as soon as an ASP in progress is completed) that demonstrates certainty and predictability for applications that have undergone review and have been evaluated but not approved for the current years work plan.
Voted YesCarried12–2
Jul 29, 2025
EC2025-0727
That Recommendation 2 be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Direct Administration to identify a sustainable long-term funding source to support the change in terms of reference for the Reserve for Future Capital and Lifecycle Maintenance and Upgrade Merged Reserve from allocating 2.6 per cent of property tax revenue and adding additional funds to achieve a total amount equal to 5.0 per cent of annual property tax revenue from an alternate sustainable funding source, and to return to Council with a recommendation as part of the 2027 - 2030 Business Plans and Budgets.
Voted NoDefeated6–8
Jul 29, 2025
EC2025-0750
That the Recommendations be amended by: In Recommendation 1 the words boundary expansion proposal as the pilot application be deleted and replaced with and K - North Regional Context Study - portion of Cell B proposals as the pilot applications; and In Recommendation 2 the words (meaning an approval new or amended ASP will start as soon as an ASP in progress is completed) be inserted following the words create a sequential ASP Workplan.
Voted YesCarried12–2
Jul 29, 2025
EC2025-0750
That Council direct Administration: To create an ASP boundary adjustment amendment approval process that is based on the existing developer-funded ASP amendment process, using the "D - (Douglas Homes)" East Stoney ASP and K - North Regional Context Study - portion of Cell B proposals as the pilot applications"; and
Voted YesCarried10–4
Jul 29, 2025
IP2025-0695
Accept the public presentation contained in Distribution 1 for the Corporate Record; and
Voted YesCarried12–2
Jul 29, 2025
EC2025-0746
Council direct Administration to bring forward a recommendation through the 2025 November Adjustments to the 2023-2026 Service Plans and Budgets to fund and resource the following work: That Council direct Administration to engage an independent third-party consultant to conduct a comprehensive post implementation review of the Citys organizational realignment. This review shall specifically examine: The total costs incurred by the realignment to date, including transition costs and ongoing operational impacts; The number, type and cost of any new positions created during or after the realignment, specifying whether these roles are management exempt, union or contractors, and where they fall within the organizational structure; The challenges and impacts experienced by staff at all levels during and following the realignment, including issues related to role clarity, workload, and employee well-being; Any measurable outcomes or qualitative benefits realized from the reorganization; The design and effectiveness of the current organizational structure, including whether it has delivered the intended efficiencies. AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that all findings and recommendations from the review be made publicly available and reported back to Council no later than Q4 2026.
Voted NoDefeated6–8
Jul 29, 2025
EC2025-0748
Council direct Administration to: Notify Foothills County, the Land and Property Rights Tribunal, the Minster of Municipal Affairs and relevant local authorities of The City of Calgarys request to adjust the municipal boundary between Foothills County and The City of Calgary through a standard annexation application for the Proposed Annexation Area in Attachment 1; Engage the Foothills County and City of Calgary Intermunicipal Committee to negotiate a standard annexation agreement for the Proposed Annexation Area, in accordance with the current policies of the Intermunicipal Development Plan, outlining options and potential processes for the annexation; and Present a draft of the fundamental terms and conditions for an annexation agreement and status update (including resourcing and budget requirements) to Council through Intergovernmental Affairs Committee no later than Q1 2026 in respect to the Proposed Annexation Area in Attachment 1.
Voted NoCarried8–6
Jun 24, 2025
EC2025-0649
Council direct administration to ;prepare amendments to ;the Land Use Bylaw by: Removing the reference to the Court of Appeals in the direction to withhold the release of a development permit.
Voted NoDefeated6–8
Jun 24, 2025
EC2025-0646
That the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED clauses be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following: "NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council direct Administration to: Request Alberta Municipalities to come present the findings of the Municipal Financial research to Council and continue to provide Alberta Municipalities with information for ongoing research. Commencing as part of the 2026 budget adjustments, indicate clearly in report materials, if applicable, if the funding request is resulting from any requirements of or resulting from another order of government including but not limited to loss of funding, part of a shared or supportive responsibility in partnership, or as part of matching funding program, with another order of government. Develop a chart representing the percentage of funding from other orders of government with respect to shared or supportive responsibility for service areas for budget adjustments starting in the 2027-2030 budget cycle (This should be similar to the charts created in the Municipal Fiscal Gap report, C2023-0960 Attachment 3, Exhibits 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3)."
Voted YesCarried8–6
Jun 24, 2025
EC2025-0653
Council direct administration to ;prepare amendments to ;the Land Use Bylaw by: Removing unnecessary language in the R-G district regarding the rear setback rule describing the location of the required parking stall. Aligning in the R-CG and H-GO districts parcel coverage when no garage is provided. Amending the H-GO district to allow for development for two or less units to follow the typical landscaping rules for single and semi-detached dwellings. Amending the R-CG district so that all development except rowhouses follow the same fence rules. AND NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Administration advertise and bring the bylaw updates direct to the September 9th, Public Hearing of Council.
Voted YesCarried12–2
Showing 30 of 3,863, newest first.
Campaign funding
Largest contributors (from itemized listings)
| Contributor | Type | Elections | Total read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mattamy Homes | Organization | 2017 | $11,500.00 |
| West Creek Developments LTD | Organization | 2017 | $10,500.00 |
| Citiland Group | Organization | 2017 | $9,515.00 |
| Progressive Waste Solutions | Organization | 2017 | $9,500.00 |
| Jayman | Individual | 2017, 2021 | $9,450.00 |
| Ronmar Holdings Inc | Organization | 2017, 2021 | $7,500.00 |
| Roy Op | Individual | 2017, 2021 | $7,350.00 |
| Qualico Partnership | Organization | 2017, 2021 | $6,500.00 |
| Brookfield Residential | Individual | 2017 | $6,330.42 |
| Genstar Development Partnership | Organization | 2017 | $6,245.63 |
| Shane Homes Limited | Organization | 2017 | $6,167.40 |
| Melcor Developments Ltd | Organization | 2017 | $6,000.00 |
| Cardel Homes | Organization | 2017 | $5,512.15 |
| Edna Rush | Individual | 2021 | $5,000.00 |
| Alan Hallman | Individual | 2021 | $5,000.00 |
| Waste Conx | Individual | 2021 | $5,000.00 |
| Truman Development Corporation | Organization | 2017 | $4,334.80 |
| Quarry Bay | Individual | 2017 | $4,183.92 |
| Kellam Berg Engineering & Surveys Ltd | Organization | 2017 | $4,012.15 |
| Checkers Transportation | Individual | 2017 | $4,000.00 |
From the candidate's disclosure statements (scanned; read by OCR or transcribed). Checked = the totals satisfy the form's own arithmetic. Contributor names and amounts are read by OCR from the attached listings and may contain errors.
Funding context
Itemized gifts read
$293,009.30
All recorded candidate elections
Largest five donors
17.2%
Share of readable itemized gifts
Verified organization coverage
21.4%
Share of readable itemized gifts
Unreadable gift amounts
1
| Named contributor | Verified business / sector | Gifts read | Business-activity source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mattamy Homes | Homebuilding | $11,500.00 | Mattamy Homes — About us Mattamy describes its homebuilding business. Only contributions already assigned to this resolved donor are classified here; this does not combine other Mattamy entities or donations made personally by staff or owners. |
| West Creek Developments LTD | Real estate development | $10,500.00 | WestCreek Developments — About us WestCreek describes residential land and community development. The disclosure spelling is retained as the donor key. The business classification does not combine other WestCreek-named organizations. |
| Qualico Partnership | Real estate development | $6,500.00 | Qualico — Our company Qualico describes homebuilding, community and commercial development, property management and building supply. This business-name match classifies the named partnership only; it does not combine Qualico Developments West LTD or other affiliates. |
| Genstar Development Partnership | Real estate development | $6,245.63 | Genstar — Where we build Genstar describes planning and developing residential communities. The published donor name is matched to that business name; the source does not independently establish the partnership's legal registration or ownership of other contributors. |
| Shane Homes Limited | Homebuilding | $6,167.40 | Shane Homes — Official website The company describes constructing and selling new homes. The disclosure name matches this business name; no personal donations or other similarly named companies are added to this donor. |
| Melcor Developments Ltd | Real estate development | $6,000.00 | Melcor Developments — About us Melcor describes land development, residential and commercial property development, and asset management. This classification applies to the named corporation; ownership or control of any other contributor is not inferred. |
| Cardel Homes | Homebuilding | $5,512.15 | Cardel Homes — Official website Cardel describes construction and sale of new homes. The business name is matched to the published donor name. Other Cardel-named companies and personal donations are not combined by this classification. |
| Truman Development Corporation | Real estate development | $4,334.80 | Truman — About us The company describes development of housing, commercial property and mixed-use communities. This record classifies this named donor only; Truman Homes and other Truman-named contributors remain separate unless the donor-resolution rules already link them. |
| La Caille Group | Real estate development | $3,500.00 | La Caille Group — Applicant submission, CPC2023-1051 Attachment 2 The company's September 2023 applicant submission describes its Calgary real estate development work and proposed mixed-use buildings. Hosted by the City, this is the applicant's own account. Other La Caille-named companies remain separate. |
| Trico Homes Inc | Homebuilding | $1,600.00 | Trico Homes — About us Trico describes construction of single-family and multi-family homes in the Calgary region. This classification applies to this named company and does not combine donations by its employees, owners or other Trico entities. |
| Opus Corporation | Real estate development | $966.96 | OPUS — About us OPUS describes commercial and multi-family development, construction, leasing and property management. This classification applies to the named contributor only and does not establish relationships with other businesses or personal donors. |
Candidate filings only; party and third-party advertiser gifts are excluded. Concentration uses readable itemized amounts, not all fundraising. Incomplete listings can change the result. Business sources verify the named organization’s activities; donation identities retain the name-matching limits of the listings. Shared funding and similar votes do not establish influence.
Office budget and spending
| Year | Office | Budget | Spent | Used | Itemized | Largest category | Details | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Ward 14 | $368,706 | $339,571 | 92% | $11,854 | Communications, printing & postage | Shared with Landon Johnston | |
| 2024 | Ward 14 | $362,945 | $350,305 | 97% | $8,765 | Office & building | ||
| 2023 | Ward 14 | $282,576 | $280,434 | 99% | $4,733 | Phones, IT & equipment | ||
| 2022 | Ward 14 | $278,400 | $273,980 | 98% | $8,913 | Travel, parking & training | ||
| 2021 | Ward 14 | $278,400 | $260,398 | 94% | $12,556 | Phones, IT & equipment |
Largest itemized lines
| Year | Amount | Vendor | Description / rationale | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2,500 | Housewives & Co | ||
| 2025 | $2,500 | Housewives & Co | ||
| 2021 | $2,381 | Can West Legacy | Recognition (Ribbons and Badges) - Ward 14 Contribution | |
| 2021 | $1,440 | Telus Account Payment | iPhone Pro - D Elkin | |
| 2024 | $1,397 | Internal | Guard Service, Ward 14 Rezoning for Housing Town Hall | |
| 2022 | $1,314 | In Recycling Council | 2 Registrations -Recycling Council of Alberta 2022 - Convention, Jasper (October 18 - 21, 2022) - Cllr Demong and B Cunningham | |
| 2021 | $1,160 | Telus Account Payment | iPhone - B Cunningham | |
| 2021 | $900 | Great News Publishing | Ward 14 Advertisement - Column Space in the Community Newsletter |
From the City Clerk's quarterly reports. Spent includes staff salaries, which are not itemized. In a year the seat changed hands the report covers both members.