Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program
Transit & transportation · Jan 28, 2025
What changed
Council endorsed a joint City–Alberta vision and directed concurrent work on the southeast, downtown and future extensions of the rail program.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Why this decision is included
A replacement rail-programme authorization with a defined scope, retained separately from the abandoned 2024 rebase and without treating companion motions as extra evidence.
How votes are grouped: This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight.
What Yes meant
Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions.
What No meant
Reject this particular vision and direction package.
Alternatives and outcome
Advance this replacement program, negotiate a different program or decline the package.
Council adopted the direction, including conditional 2025 southeast construction and downtown functional planning. This is not a declaration that the full line was built.
adoptedA recorded vote or adoption does not establish that a project or service was delivered.
Recorded choices
| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 28, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Courtney Walcott | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Courtney Walcott | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Dan McLean | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Dan McLean | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Evan Spencer | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Evan Spencer | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jasmine Mian | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jasmine Mian | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jyoti Gondek | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jyoti Gondek | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Kourtney Penner | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Kourtney Penner | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sean Chu | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sean Chu | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sonya Sharp | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sonya Sharp | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Terry Wong | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Terry Wong | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.
Published explanations
No sourced statements collected
This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.
Documented policy leadership
No documented leadership entries collected
Sponsorship and committee appointments require an explicit source; a Yes vote alone does not establish either.