Rail and bus plans, fares and mobility choices; approving a route is distinct from approving construction funding or delivering service. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.
Explicit approvals to advance the Green Line program. Choices between two rail alignments and a wind-down after another government's funding withdrawal are explained separately and do not automatically count as opposition to rail.
Policy positions
15 rows| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myke Atkinson | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Andre Chabot | 50 | 2 | 0 | 100 | Mixed choices | Jul 30, 2024 | Jan 28, 2025 |
| Harrison Clark | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Raj Dhaliwal | 50 | 2 | 0 | 100 | Mixed choices | Jul 30, 2024 | Jan 28, 2025 |
| Jeromy Farkas | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Mike Jamieson | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Landon Johnston | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| DJ Kelly | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Dan McLean | 50 | 2 | 0 | 100 | Mixed choices | Jul 30, 2024 | Jan 28, 2025 |
| John Pantazopoulos | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Nathaniel Schmidt | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Kim Tyers | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Rob Ward | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Jennifer Wyness | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Reviewed position | Jul 30, 2024 | Jan 28, 2025 |
| Andrew Yule | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Council chose a surface route at 10 Avenue and 2 Street SW over the previously studied elevated alignment and requested further planning budgets.
Outcome: The City reports that the surface alignment was approved and is in early design and planning; the downtown construction phase was not yet established.
City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Council considered studying whether ongoing Free Fare Zone operations and budgeting could move from Calgary Transit to the Downtown Strategy team.
Outcome: The final clause failed 7–8 after an earlier amendment carrying the same direction passed 8–7. Approval of the amendment did not establish final adoption. Neither vote itself abolished the Free Fare Zone.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Council deferred the Free Fare Zone decision to its updated fare strategy, due at Infrastructure and Planning Committee by the end of the first quarter of 2027.
Outcome: The final clause carried 9–6. An earlier amendment carrying the deferral passed 8–7 with a different coalition. The deferral did not itself abolish the Free Fare Zone or settle the eventual fare policy.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Council directed an increase from a 90-minute to a 120-minute valid transfer window, with a future effective date and a funding request.
Outcome: Council adopted the direction with a January 2027 effective date. As of this review the vote establishes future policy direction, not an already-operating 120-minute window.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Council asked for a comprehensive safety, equity and financial review of the downtown Free Fare Zone.
Outcome: Council commissioned a review. This vote did not itself abolish the Free Fare Zone or enact fares.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A 2026 budget amendment provided $1 million for the Primary Transit Network and $5 million for the base/local network in ongoing operating funds, financed by property taxes.
Outcome: The amendment carried 13–2. Budget approval does not prove a specified later route-frequency increase.
Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026The amendment reversed the 2023 fare freeze, approved additional 2026 fare increases and a user-fee table, and linked the revenue to budget funding changes.
Outcome: The amendment carried 8–7. This choice does not establish a general pro-transit or anti-transit position.
Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Council endorsed a joint City–Alberta vision and directed concurrent work on the southeast, downtown and future extensions of the rail program.
Outcome: Council adopted the direction, including conditional 2025 southeast construction and downtown functional planning. This is not a declaration that the full line was built.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Following Alberta's September funding communication, Council considered winding down the then-approved Green Line program while retaining assets and value.
Outcome: Council authorized the wind-down. This contingent decision is not scored as generic opposition to transit.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Council advanced a revised first phase from Eau Claire to Lynnwood/Millican and approved additional capital and municipal funding directions.
Outcome: Council approved the revised program package, subject to intergovernmental funding requirements. Later wind-down and replacement-program decisions are separate events.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 22, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | No | Reject this surface-alignment package; a member could instead prefer another rail alignment. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | No | Reject this surface-alignment package; a member could instead prefer another rail alignment. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Rob Ward | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment | Yes | Select the surface alignment and advance its planning, design and procurement. Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | Yes | Commission the feasibility study for that administrative transfer. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration | No | Reject the feasibility direction at the final main-motion clause vote. The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | Yes | Postpone the decision and consider it through the scheduled updated fare strategy. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy | No | Reject that deferral; this vote alone does not identify whether the member preferred retaining or removing the Free Fare Zone. This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | No | Reject this transfer-and-funding direction. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Dan McLean | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | No | Reject this transfer-and-funding direction. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | No | Reject this transfer-and-funding direction. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Apr 28, 2026 | Rob Ward | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Dan McLean | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Rob Ward | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone | Yes | Commission the review and its recommendations. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | No | Reject this transfer-and-funding direction. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Dan McLean | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | No | Reject this transfer-and-funding direction. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | No | Reject this transfer-and-funding direction. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | No | Reject this transfer-and-funding direction. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Rob Ward | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes | Yes | Extend the transfer window effective January 1, 2027 and refer the $2 million base-funding request to budget deliberations. February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Dan McLean | Add $6 million for transit network service | No | Reject this particular service-and-funding allocation. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Add $6 million for transit network service | No | Reject this particular service-and-funding allocation. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Rob Ward | Add $6 million for transit network service | Yes | Approve the $6 million operating allocation and its tax funding. A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | Yes | Approve the fare changes and fee table specified by the amendment. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | Yes | Approve the fare changes and fee table specified by the amendment. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Dan McLean | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | Yes | Approve the fare changes and fee table specified by the amendment. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | Yes | Approve the fare changes and fee table specified by the amendment. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | No | Reject this fare-and-budget funding proposal. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | Yes | Approve the fare changes and fee table specified by the amendment. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | No | Reject this fare-and-budget funding proposal. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | Yes | Approve the fare changes and fee table specified by the amendment. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | No | Reject this fare-and-budget funding proposal. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | Yes | Approve the fare changes and fee table specified by the amendment. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | Yes | Approve the fare changes and fee table specified by the amendment. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | No | Reject this fare-and-budget funding proposal. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | No | Reject this fare-and-budget funding proposal. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | No | Reject this fare-and-budget funding proposal. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Rob Ward | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget | No | Reject this fare-and-budget funding proposal. The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Courtney Walcott | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Courtney Walcott | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Dan McLean | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Dan McLean | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Evan Spencer | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Evan Spencer | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jasmine Mian | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jasmine Mian | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jyoti Gondek | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jyoti Gondek | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Kourtney Penner | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Kourtney Penner | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | No | Reject this particular vision and direction package. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sean Chu | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sean Chu | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sonya Sharp | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sonya Sharp | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Jan 28, 2025 | Terry Wong | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Terry Wong | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program | Yes | Endorse the shared vision and advance the stated construction and planning steps, subject to funding conditions. The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Dan McLean | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Dan McLean | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Peter Demong | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Peter Demong | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Sean Chu | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Sean Chu | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Terry Wong | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | No | Reject the proposed wind-down authority. The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | Context / unscored |
Sep 17, 2024 | Terry Wong | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal | Yes | Authorize the wind-down in the stated funding circumstances. An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Dan McLean | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Dan McLean | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Dan McLean | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Peter Demong | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Peter Demong | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Peter Demong | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Sean Chu | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Sean Chu | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Sean Chu | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | No | Reject this revised scope and financial package; a No may concern its cost or scope rather than rail in general. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 30, 2024 | Terry Wong | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Terry Wong | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 30, 2024 | Terry Wong | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework | Yes | Approve the revised core scope and funding package. This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | Reviewed policy choice |
| Date / precision | Person | Record type | Choice or statement | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Outcome not verified | Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned. | Milestone source |
| Oct 29, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Outcome not verified | Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned. | Milestone source |
| Oct 29, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Outcome not verified | Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned. | Milestone source |
| Oct 29, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Outcome not verified | Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned. | Milestone source |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · No Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · No Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Choose the downtown Green Line surface alignment · Yes Both the selected and baseline options are rail alignments. Treating this Yes/No choice as a general pro/anti-transit score would be misleading. | City of Calgary, Green Line Downtown Segment, September 22 update · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 10, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Stated position | Prioritized MAX Green bus rapid transit within the coming budget cycle while northern LRT remains an unfunded longer-term planning exercise. | Yule north-corridor explanation, September 10, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Aug 6, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Stated position | Supported protective shields for bus operators alongside training, safety-practice reviews and continued security investment after an operator assault. | Dhaliwal operator-safety statement, August 6, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Vote explanation | Supported deferral to preserve the free-fare zone during a broader fare review. | Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 27, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Vote explanation | Supported retaining the Free Fare Zone pending a wider fare review, broader options and further engagement with affected downtown users. | Yule fare-zone explanation, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · Yes The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No Earlier amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause failed 7–8. Keep the stages visible without double-counting or substituting amendment passage for adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Consider a review of Free Fare Zone administration · No The final clause determines adoption of the feasibility direction. It is not a rail-investment choice or a vote to abolish free fares. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, pages 332–334 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · Yes The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No The Yule/Clark amendment passed 8–7 before the final clause passed 9–6 with a changed coalition. Yule and Schmidt voted Yes at both stages; written reasons should link to this May 26 case rather than the earlier February 24 review. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Defer the Free Fare Zone decision to the updated fare strategy · No This is the adopted final deferral clause. It addresses decision timing and process; neither side identifies support for removing free fares or investing in the Green Line. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 26, page 333 final 9–6 clause; page 331 amendment 8–7 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 4, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Vote explanation | Opposed the transfer extension, preferring frequency improvements and the comprehensive fare review. | Schmidt: vote explanations, May 4, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Review the downtown Free Fare Zone · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · No February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · No February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · No February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · No February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Extend transit transfers to 120 minutes · Yes February direction requested the impact and implementation assessment before the April decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · No A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · No A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Add $6 million for transit network service · Yes A direct transit-service funding choice, but it does not advance the Green Line programme and cannot supply a rail-program-investment observation. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 2 continuation, page 591 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · Yes The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · Yes The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · Yes The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · Yes The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · No The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · Yes The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · No The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · Yes The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · No The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · Yes The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · Yes The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · No The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · No The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · No The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Reverse the transit fare freeze for the 2026 budget · No The proposal combines fare revenue, operating-service costs and tax effects; it is not Green Line advancement and those tradeoffs cannot become one rail-support sign. | Confirmed 2025 Council minutes, December 1 continuation, page 583 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| December 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Vote explanation | Supported ending downtown free fares, citing enforcement difficulties and inequity for outer-city commuters, and redirecting resources across the network. | Jamieson budget rationale, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 18, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Stated position | Advocated extending free transit to everyone aged 18 and younger, citing family affordability and young people's independence. | Atkinson: youth transit proposal, September 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 18, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Campaign commitment | Expand free transit eligibility to all youth aged 18 and younger. | Atkinson: youth transit proposal, September 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Stated position | Supported completing Green Line Phase 1, improving northern bus rapid transit, and extending the low-income transit pass program. | Farkas: mobility policy brief, July 17, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 17, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Campaign commitment | Extend the low-income transit pass program for ten years. | Farkas: mobility policy brief, July 17, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Stated position | Committed to a funded Ward 7 protected cycling network by 2035, coordinating construction with scheduled road and sidewalk work. | Atkinson: cycling network commitment, April 24, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Campaign commitment | Develop and fund construction of a complete protected cycling network in Ward 7 by 2035. | Atkinson: cycling network commitment, April 24, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Stated position | Advocated an underground downtown Green Line to Eau Claire and future expansion north across the river. | Atkinson: Green Line proposal, March 31, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · No The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The package expressly advances construction and planning for an LRT program, with specified conditions. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Advance the replacement south-to-north LRT program · Yes The downtown functional-planning direction is another part of the same program package. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Ariana Kippers | Stated position | Supported completing the Green Line. | CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Brian Thiessen | Stated position | Supported completing the Green Line. | CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Andre Chabot | Stated position | Favoured continuing Green Line construction, arguing senior-government funding could not be transferred to other projects. | Question 12 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| 2025 | Heather McRae | Stated position | Supported completing the Green Line. | CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Landon Johnston | Stated position | Supported finishing the southeast Green Line and an airport connection, with fixed scope and phased delivery. | Question 12 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| 2025 | Larry R Heather | Stated position | Opposed completing the Green Line. | CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · No The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Authorize a Green Line wind-down after provincial withdrawal · Yes An amendment sought transparency, cost recovery and criteria for future LRT participation. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 31, 2024 | Terry Wong | Vote explanation | Explained supporting the shortened Green Line and added municipal investment for connectivity, future extensions and avoiding further cost escalation. | Wong: Green Line vote explanation, July 31, 2024 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · No This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Instructions to secure funding-agreement amendments and procurement waivers. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes Related contracting authority is context, not another independent rail score. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Approve the rebased Green Line core and financial framework · Yes This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2024 | Dan McLean | Stated position | Maintained opposition to electric-bus procurement, questioning reliability, charging infrastructure and value compared with natural-gas buses. | McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Undated source | DJ Kelly | Stated position | Proposed the full Green Line with a downtown tunnel and LRT/MAX waits of at most ten minutes for fifteen hours daily. | Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Undated source | DJ Kelly | Campaign commitment | Provide LRT and MAX services at intervals of ten minutes or less, fifteen hours per day, seven days per week. | Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
Prioritized MAX Green bus rapid transit within the coming budget cycle while northern LRT remains an unfunded longer-term planning exercise.
Yule north-corridor explanation, September 10, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds a specific bus-versus-rail sequencing priority; does not infer opposition to rail or confuse the September 8 committee recommendation with final Council approval.
Supported protective shields for bus operators alongside training, safety-practice reviews and continued security investment after an operator assault.
Dhaliwal operator-safety statement, August 6, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds first transit coverage for an uncovered current member through his dated authored statement; describes support without crediting him with collective implementation.
Supported deferral to preserve the free-fare zone during a broader fare review.
Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Explains the May deferral, linked to that actual vote rather than the earlier February review instruction.
Supported retaining the Free Fare Zone pending a wider fare review, broader options and further engagement with affected downtown users.
Yule fare-zone explanation, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an independent fare-policy choice rather than repeating the northern-service priority; distinguishes review from permanent retention.
Opposed the transfer extension, preferring frequency improvements and the comprehensive fare review.
Schmidt: vote explanations, May 4, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Explains a fare-versus-frequency tradeoff; a No on the extension cannot establish opposition to transit service generally.
Supported ending downtown free fares, citing enforcement difficulties and inequity for outer-city commuters, and redirecting resources across the network.
Jamieson budget rationale, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an explicit issue-specific voting explanation for an uncovered current member; the report is signed December 2025, so only month precision is assigned.
Advocated extending free transit to everyone aged 18 and younger, citing family affordability and young people's independence.
Atkinson: youth transit proposal, September 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Adds a specific fare-eligibility proposal, distinct from rail alignment and cycling infrastructure.
Supported completing Green Line Phase 1, improving northern bus rapid transit, and extending the low-income transit pass program.
Farkas: mobility policy brief, July 17, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Records distinct rail, bus and fare priorities without turning a platform statement into a recorded programme vote.
Committed to a funded Ward 7 protected cycling network by 2035, coordinating construction with scheduled road and sidewalk work.
Atkinson: cycling network commitment, April 24, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Adds a dated network objective with a funding and construction approach; publication precision and implementation remain separate.
Advocated an underground downtown Green Line to Eau Claire and future expansion north across the river.
Atkinson: Green Line proposal, March 31, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Preserves the preferred alignment so an alignment vote is not mistaken for support or opposition to rail itself.
Supported completing the Green Line.
CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A named candidate’s original answer to the same Green Line question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. A response is not a recorded programme authorization.
Supported completing the Green Line.
CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A named candidate’s original answer to the same Green Line question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. A response is not a recorded programme authorization.
Favoured continuing Green Line construction, arguing senior-government funding could not be transferred to other projects.
Question 12 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an independent issue and concrete policy choice for a current member with no existing statements.
Supported completing the Green Line.
CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A named candidate’s original answer to the same Green Line question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. A response is not a recorded programme authorization.
Supported finishing the southeast Green Line and an airport connection, with fixed scope and phased delivery.
Question 12 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an independent issue and concrete policy choice for a current member with no existing statements.
Opposed completing the Green Line.
CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A named candidate’s original answer to the same Green Line question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. A response is not a recorded programme authorization.
Explained supporting the shortened Green Line and added municipal investment for connectivity, future extensions and avoiding further cost escalation.
Wong: Green Line vote explanation, July 31, 2024 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Provides the member’s explanation of the rebase tradeoff instead of equating a shorter line with opposition to rail.
Maintained opposition to electric-bus procurement, questioning reliability, charging infrastructure and value compared with natural-gas buses.
McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds first issue coverage for an uncovered current member from his signed 2024 newsletter; layout timestamps are not treated as publication dates.
Proposed the full Green Line with a downtown tunnel and LRT/MAX waits of at most ten minutes for fifteen hours daily.
Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Adds frequency and alignment preferences that cannot be recovered from the narrow programme-investment score.
Expand free transit eligibility to all youth aged 18 and younger.
Atkinson: youth transit proposal, September 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.
Milestone sourceExtend the low-income transit pass program for ten years.
Farkas: mobility policy brief, July 17, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.
Milestone sourceDevelop and fund construction of a complete protected cycling network in Ward 7 by 2035.
Atkinson: cycling network commitment, April 24, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.
Milestone sourceProvide LRT and MAX services at intervals of ten minutes or less, fifteen hours per day, seven days per week.
Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.
Milestone source