Ariana Kippers

Candidate. Ran for councillor in 2025. Ran with The Calgary Party in 2025.

Elections contested

Won

Votes received

1,826

all races combined

Raised for 2025

$12,257

spent $20,238

Record

Ward 9 councillor

View chart data

Chart values

1 row

Office	Record
Ward 9 councillor	2025 Ward 9 councillor: 10.3%, placed 4 of 7

Bars are terms on council; diamonds are elections (filled = won). Records start with the 2010 election.

Elections

Year	Race	Votes	Share	Affiliation	Result
2025	Ward 9 councillor	1,826	10.3%	The Calgary Party	4 of 7

Official results, City of Calgary Open Data (sources). Share is of all votes cast in the race; affiliations appear from 2025, the first election with municipal parties.

Name as recorded

Source	Spelling
Ballot	ARIANA KIPPERS
Disclosure	Ariana Kippers

Spellings matched to this person across sources. See About for how names are resolved.

Issue positions

Explore the issues and policy measures or compare this person.

Advancing the Green Line rail program

Explicit approvals to advance the Green Line program. Choices between two rail alignments and a wind-down after another government's funding withdrawal are explained separately and do not automatically count as opposition to rail.

Opposed the reviewed advancement proposalsSupported the reviewed advancement proposals

Ariana Kippers

Insufficient voting evidence

0 reviewed decisions

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Ariana Kippers	Not available	0	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Not available	Not available

Broader residential permissions

Reviewed land-use decisions where the direction of residential building permissions is explicit. Broader permission does not establish that a home was built. Contextual amendments do not each become another independent score.

Favoured narrower permissionsFavoured broader permissions

Ariana Kippers

Insufficient voting evidence

0 reviewed decisions

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Ariana Kippers	Not available	0	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Not available	Not available

Capital borrowing authorizations

Final readings of specified capital borrowing bylaws. This is a record of support for these particular debt-financed projects, not a general tax, spending or fiscal-conservatism score; utility-supported and tax-supported debt may differ.

Opposed the reviewed borrowing authoritiesSupported the reviewed borrowing authorities

Ariana Kippers

Insufficient voting evidence

0 reviewed decisions

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Ariana Kippers	Not available	0	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Not available	Not available

Climate and Environment operating allocations

Explicit amendments to Climate and Environment operating allocations. This is separate from formal targets and declarations; multiple amendments within one annual budget share one scoring weight.

Favoured the reviewed funding reductionsFavoured retaining the reviewed allocations

Ariana Kippers

Insufficient voting evidence

0 reviewed decisions

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Ariana Kippers	Not available	0	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Not available	Not available

Community-based safety responses

Explicit funding or plan approvals for community-based prevention and wellbeing responses. This measure makes no claim about a member's position on every police budget or the effectiveness of an adopted plan.

Opposed the reviewed community-safety proposalsSupported the reviewed community-safety proposals

Ariana Kippers

Insufficient voting evidence

0 reviewed decisions

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Ariana Kippers	Not available	0	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Not available	Not available

Formal municipal climate commitments

Reviewed decisions establishing or rescinding municipal climate targets, strategies and declarations. A declaration vote is not evidence of a particular dollar amount or emissions outcome.

Favoured fewer formal commitmentsFavoured more formal commitments

Ariana Kippers

Insufficient voting evidence

0 reviewed decisions

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Ariana Kippers	Not available	0	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Not available	Not available

Public funding for the Event Centre

Specific public financial commitments to the Event Centre project, including the original project and the replacement agreement. These are different proposals across time; a vote is not a generic position on all major projects.

Opposed the reviewed public commitmentsSupported the reviewed public commitments

Ariana Kippers

Insufficient voting evidence

0 reviewed decisions

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Ariana Kippers	Not available	0	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Not available	Not available

Public support for non-market housing

Reviewed decisions that provide a specific financial or tax benefit for non-market housing. A vote records a choice on that proposal, not an estimate of affordability outcomes or an overall housing ideology.

Opposed the reviewed support proposalsSupported the reviewed support proposals

Ariana Kippers

Insufficient voting evidence

0 reviewed decisions

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Ariana Kippers	Not available	0	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Not available	Not available

Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Policy choices over time

Date / precision	Person	Record type	Choice or statement	Source
2025	Ariana Kippers	Stated position	Supported completing the Green Line.	CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
2025	Ariana Kippers	Stated position	Supported exploring more purpose-built student housing.	CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Votes, statements, promises and action milestones retain distinct labels. Dates preserve source precision; undated records appear last. Different proposals can explain different choices; a changed vote is not automatically a changed belief.

Statements and reasons for votes

Stated position · 2025

Supported completing the Green Line.

CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Why this statement was collected

A named candidate’s original answer to the same Green Line question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. A response is not a recorded programme authorization.

Stated position · 2025

Supported exploring more purpose-built student housing.

CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Why this statement was collected

A named candidate’s original answer to the same student-housing question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. It contributes no spectrum score.

Published statements are attributed to their author and kept separate from recorded votes.

Promises and actions

No sourced commitments collected

A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.

Milestones describe the evidence collected. Adoption, an individual vote and implementation are different events; a missing milestone is not proof that a promise was broken.

Policy leadership

No documented leadership entries collected

Sponsorship and committee appointments require an explicit source; a Yes vote alone does not establish either.

Appointment records do not establish continued service beyond their sourced term. Authorship and sponsorship require explicit documentation.

Campaign funding

All campaign finance

Election	Contributions	Own money	Fundraising	Spending	Totals	Statements (PDF)
2025	$12,257	$5,460	$0	$20,238	Checked	2025

Largest contributors (from itemized listings)

Contributor	Type	Elections	Total read
Ariana Kippers	Individual	2025	$2,000.00
ee eee	Individual	2025	$500.00
Paul Virk	Individual	2025	$500.00
ditt	Individual	2025	$480.20
Casa	Individual	2025	$480.20
rburn	Individual	2025	$60.00
PEE Caiycy	Individual	2025	$49.48
London	Individual	2025	unreadable
Cie ACM	Individual	2025	unreadable

From the candidate's disclosure statements (scanned; read by OCR or transcribed). Checked = the totals satisfy the form's own arithmetic. Contributor names and amounts are read by OCR from the attached listings and may contain errors.

Funding context

All recorded candidate elections

Itemized gifts read

$4,069.88

All recorded candidate elections

Largest five donors

97.3%

Share of readable itemized gifts

Verified organization coverage

–

Share of readable itemized gifts

Unreadable gift amounts

No verified business mappings for this selection

Business activities are curated from primary sources; personal employers are not inferred.

Candidate filings only; party and third-party advertiser gifts are excluded. Concentration uses readable itemized amounts, not all fundraising. Incomplete listings can change the result. Business sources verify the named organization’s activities; donation identities retain the name-matching limits of the listings. Shared funding and similar votes do not establish influence.