Official results, City of Calgary Open Data (sources). Share is of all votes cast in the race; affiliations appear from 2025, the first election with municipal parties.
Name as recorded
Source
Spelling
Ballot
SONYA SHARP
Vote record
Sonya Sharp
Disclosure
Sonya Sharp
Spellings matched to this person across sources. See About for how names are resolved.
Explicit approvals to advance the Green Line program. Choices between two rail alignments and a wind-down after another government's funding withdrawal are explained separately and do not automatically count as opposition to rail.
Opposed the reviewed advancement proposalsSupported the reviewed advancement proposals
Reviewed land-use decisions where the direction of residential building permissions is explicit. Broader permission does not establish that a home was built. Contextual amendments do not each become another independent score.
Final readings of specified capital borrowing bylaws. This is a record of support for these particular debt-financed projects, not a general tax, spending or fiscal-conservatism score; utility-supported and tax-supported debt may differ.
Opposed the reviewed borrowing authoritiesSupported the reviewed borrowing authorities
Explicit amendments to Climate and Environment operating allocations. This is separate from formal targets and declarations; multiple amendments within one annual budget share one scoring weight.
Favoured the reviewed funding reductionsFavoured retaining the reviewed allocations
Explicit funding or plan approvals for community-based prevention and wellbeing responses. This measure makes no claim about a member's position on every police budget or the effectiveness of an adopted plan.
Opposed the reviewed community-safety proposalsSupported the reviewed community-safety proposals
Reviewed decisions establishing or rescinding municipal climate targets, strategies and declarations. A declaration vote is not evidence of a particular dollar amount or emissions outcome.
Favoured fewer formal commitmentsFavoured more formal commitments
Specific public financial commitments to the Event Centre project, including the original project and the replacement agreement. These are different proposals across time; a vote is not a generic position on all major projects.
Opposed the reviewed public commitmentsSupported the reviewed public commitments
Reviewed decisions that provide a specific financial or tax benefit for non-market housing. A vote records a choice on that proposal, not an estimate of affordability outcomes or an overall housing ideology.
Opposed the reviewed support proposalsSupported the reviewed support proposals
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.
The proposal responds to another government's withdrawal and cannot reliably distinguish support for rail from opposition to the funding circumstances.
This vote explicitly advances rail construction and its financial framework. Related approvals and amendments are counted within the same program decision.
This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Votes, statements, promises and action milestones retain distinct labels. Dates preserve source precision; undated records appear last. Different proposals can explain different choices; a changed vote is not automatically a changed belief.
Statements and reasons for votes
Stated position · Oct 5, 2023
Supported the Event Centre agreement as a downtown investment connecting sports, culture, commercial activity and public amenities.
Adds an attributed explanation of the replacement agreement’s anticipated benefits, separate from proof of delivery.
Published statements are attributed to their author and kept separate from recorded votes.
Promises and actions
No sourced commitments collected
A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.
Milestones describe the evidence collected. Adoption, an individual vote and implementation are different events; a missing milestone is not proof that a promise was broken.
Policy leadership
Person
Documented role
Body / proposal
Date
Evidence
Committee Chair
Event Centre Committee
Oct 5, 2023 · appointment/action record
Identified as chair in the City's announcement on this date. The appointment's original start and end are not established here.
Appointment records do not establish continued service beyond their sourced term. Authorship and sponsorship require explicit documentation.
Voting record
Council
Votes cast
On split votes
Participation
Against the result*
Same vote as mayor
2021–2025 council
1,353
671
96.8%
29.7%
79.2%
Vote counts and agreement here use Council meetings, with procedural motions excluded. A missing vote counts as not participating because absences are rarely recorded. *On split (non-unanimous) motions.
Votes the same way as…
2021–2025 council
Jennifer Wyness90%
Terry Wong89%
Andre Chabot86%
Dan McLean85%
Richard Pootmans85%
Peter Demong84%
Raj Dhaliwal82%
Evan Spencer82%
Sean Chu81%
Jasmine Mian80%
Kourtney Penner79%
Jyoti Gondek79%
Gian-Carlo Carra78%
Courtney Walcott78%
View chart data
Chart values
14 rows
Category
Value
Jennifer Wyness
90%
Terry Wong
89%
Andre Chabot
86%
Dan McLean
85%
Richard Pootmans
85%
Peter Demong
84%
Raj Dhaliwal
82%
Evan Spencer
82%
Sean Chu
81%
Jasmine Mian
80%
Kourtney Penner
79%
Jyoti Gondek
79%
Gian-Carlo Carra
78%
Courtney Walcott
78%
Share of Council-meeting motions both members voted on where they cast the same vote (procedural motions excluded).
Votes by topic
Substantive recorded votes
NoYes
Planning & land use56299
Budget, taxes & finance49272
Transit & transportation49179
Governance & council11109
Other11103
Housing & affordability644
Economy & business445
Social & community services236
Environment, water & climate124
Public safety & policing24
Arts, culture, sport & events120
Public health114
Intergovernmental6
View chart data
Chart values
13 rows
Topic
No
Yes
Planning & land use
56
299
Budget, taxes & finance
49
272
Transit & transportation
49
179
Governance & council
11
109
Other
11
103
Housing & affordability
6
44
Economy & business
4
45
Social & community services
2
36
Environment, water & climate
1
24
Public safety & policing
0
24
Arts, culture, sport & events
1
20
Public health
1
14
Intergovernmental
0
6
Council and committee votes; procedural motions excluded. Topics come from keyword rules applied to the motion text.
Council direct Administration to conduct a comprehensive value for money audit of all City climate-related spending, including operating and capital expenditures tied to the Climate Emergency declaration and subsequent climate strategies, across all business units and departments, ;and return to Council no later than 2025 December 15 through Executive Committee ;to confirm cost, timing, internal or external auditor and scope, where the scope considers the following: a. A full accounting of annual climate-related expenditures since the declaration of a Climate Emergency in November 2021;
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
Council direct Administration to: Grant an exemption to the United Place building from the requirement in Section 2.1 of the Downtown Calgary Development Incentive Program Terms of Reference that eligible properties must be currently classified by The City of Calgary as commercial office use and non-residential property for assessment and tax purposes. Consider and evaluate an application submitted for the conversion of the United Place building to residential units in future round(s) of the Downtown Calgary Development Incentive Program pursuant to the Programs Terms of Reference, provided that the application and proposed project meet all requirements of the Program (other than the property classification requirement referenced in Statement 1 of this Notice of Motion above) and pass reasonable due diligence conducted by Administration. Evaluate any application submitted for the conversion of the United Place building to residential units against any and all other conversion project applications submitted during that round of the Program and that only the highest scoring applications, as determined by Administration in its sole discretion, will be recommended for approval.
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
Council direct Administration to: Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 with: a. A summary of potential municipal, provincial, and federal rule changes that would allow more authority for peace officers to seize, transport, and dispose of unknown substances; ;
Public safety & policing · Regular Meeting of Council
Council direct Administration to conduct a comprehensive value for money audit of all City climate-related spending, including operating and capital expenditures tied to the Climate Emergency declaration and subsequent climate strategies, across all business units and departments, ;and return to Council no later than 2025 December 15 through Executive Committee ;to confirm cost, timing, internal or external auditor and scope, where the scope considers the following: c. Identification of cost savings, duplications, or expenditures not delivering measurable benefits;
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
Council direct Administration to: Work with the Mayor to send a letter to the provincial Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Services as soon as possible to request an expedited process for providing transit and peace officers with enhanced authority to seize, transport, and dispose of unknown substances.
Transit & transportation · Regular Meeting of Council
Direct the City Clerk's Office to distribute the letter from the Climate Advisory Committee with respect to Item 9.4.6, Notice of Motion - Rescinding climate emergency, value for money audit and climate strategy spending, EC2025-0859 and add it to the Corporate Record.
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
Council direct Administration to conduct a comprehensive value for money audit of all City climate-related spending, including operating and capital expenditures tied to the Climate Emergency declaration and subsequent climate strategies, across all business units and departments, ;and return to Council no later than 2025 December 15 through Executive Committee ;to confirm cost, timing, internal or external auditor and scope, where the scope considers the following: b. An assessment of whether spending outcomes are aligned with Councils jurisdiction and priorities;
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
Council direct Administration to: Consider the $7.5 million required for the residential conversion of the Barron Building a high priority need and include a new ask for one-time funding in the 2026 Budget Document for Council approval. Subject to the $7.5 million of one-time funding described above being approved, and notwithstanding any dates or deadlines to the contrary in the Program Terms of Reference: (a) establish and implement a time-frame to accept applications for the Program, and (b) if an application is approved, negotiate a funding agreement with the successful applicant (if any). Conduct reasonable due diligence on all applicants to the Program which an applicant must pass to be eligible for Program funding and which will inform the evaluation of application.
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
Council direct Administration to conduct a comprehensive value for money audit of all City climate-related spending, including operating and capital expenditures tied to the Climate Emergency declaration and subsequent climate strategies, across all business units and departments, ;and return to Council no later than 2025 December 15 through Executive Committee ;to confirm cost, timing, internal or external auditor and scope, where the scope considers the following: d. Recommendations for how climate-related spending can be better aligned with core municipal responsibilities and financial sustainability;
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
That Recommendations 3, 4 and 5 be inserted as follows: Work with the Mayor to send a letter to the provincial Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Services as soon as possible to request an expedited process for providing transit and peace officers with enhanced authority to seize, transport, and dispose of unknown substances.
Transit & transportation · Regular Meeting of Council
That Recommendations 3, 4 and 5 be inserted as follows: 3. Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 with: b. An analysis of the approaches taken by other Canadian municipalities who have sought to ban open drug use, as well as court diversion programs including but not limited to, community courts; and c. A summary of Calgary's current Community Court partnership and funding model, as well as any anticipated changes to the delivery and/or funding models. 4. Prepare: ; a. a submission for the 2026 annual budget adjustment process in November 2025 to sustainably fund Community Court from base budget at the current level of service; and b. a proposal to sustainably fund an expanded Community Court scope that may include open drug use violations and weapons offenses for a pilot program in 2026, as well as continued funding for the 2027-2030 budget process.
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
Administration report the results publicly ;to Council no later than 2026 September to inform the 2026 November budget deliberations on the 2027-2030 Service Plans and Budgets, with clear, plain language explanations of climate-related expenditures and recommendations, so that Council and Calgarians can evaluate whether climate spending provides value for money.
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
That Recommendations 3, 4 and 5 be inserted as follows: 3. Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 ;with: a. A summary of potential municipal, provincial, and federal rule changes that would allow more authority for peace officers to seize, transport, and dispose of unknown substances;
Public safety & policing · Regular Meeting of Council
Council direct Administration to: Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 with: b. An analysis of the approaches taken by other Canadian municipalities who have sought to ban open drug use, as well as court diversion programs including but not limited to, community courts; and c. A summary of Calgary's current Community Court partnership and funding model, as well as any anticipated changes to the delivery and/or funding models. Prepare: ; a. a submission for the 2026 annual budget adjustment process in November 2025 to sustainably fund Community Court from base budget at the current level of service; and b. a proposal to sustainably fund an expanded Community Court scope that may include open drug use violations and weapons offences for a pilot program in 2026, as well as continued funding for the 2027-2030 budget process.
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
Council direct Administration to: Bring a report to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 January that considers more punitive fines for the open display of weapons, potentially including: a. a base fine higher than the current $250; b. different fine amounts for different types of weapons, informed by their varying potential to intimidate the public; and c. escalating fine amounts for repeat offenders. Return to the Community Development Committee no later than 2026 Q2 with: a. An investigation of potential municipal, provincial, and federal rule changes that would allow more flexibility for peace officers to seize, transport, and dispose of weapons; and b. An analysis of the approaches taken by other Canadian municipalities who have sought to ban certain types of weapons and their applicability to Calgary
Public safety & policing · Regular Meeting of Council
Forward this report and budget request to the November 2026 budget adjustments for Council's consideration; That the Intergovernmental Affairs Committee recommend that Council: Adopt Confidential Recommendations 1-2 contained in the Confidential Report; Direct consideration of further budget requirement for the work in the prioritization of investments in future Service Plans and Budget; and Direct that the Closed Meeting discussions, presentation, recommendations, cover report and attachments remain confidential pursuant to Sections 26 (Disclosure harmful to intergovernmental relations), and 29 (Advice from officials), of the Access to Information Act, to be reviewed by 2035 September 4.
That new Recommendations 1 and 2 as follows, be inserted and the remaining Recommendations be renumbered accordingly: 1. Forward this Notice of Motion, and the map of the ;Proposed Annexation Area in Attachment 1, to Foothills County Council and request a letter no later than September 12, 2025 from the Reeve on behalf of Council stating their agreement with what is proposed; 2.Upon receipt of a letter from Foothills County consenting to this annexation, submit the same to the Minister of Municipal Affairs requesting an annexation process that cuts red tape and expedites approvals based on mutual agreement for an annexation between the City of Calgary and Foothills County; That renumbered Recommendation 3 (original Recommendation 1) be amended by inserting the words Upon receipt of a confirmation letter for annexation from the Minister of Municipal Affairs, formally prior to the words notify Foothills County, the Land and Property Rights Tribunal. That renumbered Recommendation 4 (original Recommendation 2) be amended by inserting the words and consider any adjacent lands that would strengthen the delivery of housing and services in the proposed area following the words outlining options and potential processes for the annexation, and That renumbered Recommendation 5 (original Recommendation 3) be amended by deleting the words Q1 2026 prior to the words no later than and replacing with the words Q2 2026.
That with respect to ;Revised Notice of Motion EC2025-0761, the following be adopted, after amendment: Therefore be it Resolved that Council directs Administration to allocate $7M of one-time funding from the Housing Accelerator Funds to further fund the Shallow Utility Burial Pilot Program starting in 2025; and Further be it resolved that Council directs Administration to assess the pilot program and consider a future funding source for a permanent Shallow Utility Burial Program in the prioritization of investments for the 2025 November Budget Adjustments or future Service Plans and Budgets. ;
Housing & affordability · Regular Meeting of Council
That Council direct Administration: To leverage the existing criteria-based evaluation from the intake process for ASP amendments and new ASPs, and create a sequential ASP Workplan (meaning an approval new or amended ASP will start as soon as an ASP in progress is completed) that demonstrates certainty and predictability for applications that have undergone review and have been evaluated but not approved for the current years work plan.
That Recommendation 2 be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Direct Administration to identify a sustainable long-term funding source to support the change in terms of reference for the Reserve for Future Capital and Lifecycle Maintenance and Upgrade Merged Reserve from allocating 2.6 per cent of property tax revenue and adding additional funds to achieve a total amount equal to 5.0 per cent of annual property tax revenue from an alternate sustainable funding source, and to return to Council with a recommendation as part of the 2027 - 2030 Business Plans and Budgets.
Budget, taxes & finance · Regular Meeting of Council
That the Recommendations be amended by: In Recommendation 1 the words boundary expansion proposal as the pilot application be deleted and replaced with and K - North Regional Context Study - portion of Cell B proposals as the pilot applications; and In Recommendation 2 the words (meaning an approval new or amended ASP will start as soon as an ASP in progress is completed) be inserted following the words create a sequential ASP Workplan.
That Council direct Administration: To create an ASP boundary adjustment amendment approval process that is based on the existing developer-funded ASP amendment process, using the "D - (Douglas Homes)" East Stoney ASP and K - North Regional Context Study - portion of Cell B proposals as the pilot applications"; and
Council direct Administration to bring forward a recommendation through the 2025 November Adjustments to the 2023-2026 Service Plans and Budgets to fund and resource the following work: That Council direct Administration to engage an independent third-party consultant to conduct a comprehensive post implementation review of the Citys organizational realignment. This review shall specifically examine: The total costs incurred by the realignment to date, including transition costs and ongoing operational impacts; The number, type and cost of any new positions created during or after the realignment, specifying whether these roles are management exempt, union or contractors, and where they fall within the organizational structure; The challenges and impacts experienced by staff at all levels during and following the realignment, including issues related to role clarity, workload, and employee well-being; Any measurable outcomes or qualitative benefits realized from the reorganization; The design and effectiveness of the current organizational structure, including whether it has delivered the intended efficiencies. AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that all findings and recommendations from the review be made publicly available and reported back to Council no later than Q4 2026.
Council direct Administration to: Notify Foothills County, the Land and Property Rights Tribunal, the Minster of Municipal Affairs and relevant local authorities of The City of Calgarys request to adjust the municipal boundary between Foothills County and The City of Calgary through a standard annexation application for the Proposed Annexation Area in Attachment 1; Engage the Foothills County and City of Calgary Intermunicipal Committee to negotiate a standard annexation agreement for the Proposed Annexation Area, in accordance with the current policies of the Intermunicipal Development Plan, outlining options and potential processes for the annexation; and Present a draft of the fundamental terms and conditions for an annexation agreement and status update (including resourcing and budget requirements) to Council through Intergovernmental Affairs Committee no later than Q1 2026 in respect to the Proposed Annexation Area in Attachment 1.
Council direct administration to ;prepare amendments to ;the Land Use Bylaw by: Removing the reference to the Court of Appeals in the direction to withhold the release of a development permit.
That the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED clauses be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following: "NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council direct Administration to: Request Alberta Municipalities to come present the findings of the Municipal Financial research to Council and continue to provide Alberta Municipalities with information for ongoing research. Commencing as part of the 2026 budget adjustments, indicate clearly in report materials, if applicable, if the funding request is resulting from any requirements of or resulting from another order of government including but not limited to loss of funding, part of a shared or supportive responsibility in partnership, or as part of matching funding program, with another order of government. Develop a chart representing the percentage of funding from other orders of government with respect to shared or supportive responsibility for service areas for budget adjustments starting in the 2027-2030 budget cycle (This should be similar to the charts created in the Municipal Fiscal Gap report, C2023-0960 Attachment 3, Exhibits 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3)."
Transit & transportation · Regular Meeting of Council
From the candidate's disclosure statements (scanned; read by OCR or transcribed). Checked = the totals satisfy the form's own arithmetic. Contributor listings for 2025 were transcribed from the scans; the others are read by OCR and may contain errors.
CANA describes commercial construction and construction management. This business-name classification applies to CANA Limited only; it does not combine other group entities or personal donations by employees or owners.
RGO describes supplying commercial furniture, flooring, window coverings, technology and interior solutions. The separately listed Ross Glen c/o RGO Products Ltd. donor is not treated as the same contributor by this classification.
The company describes new-home construction in Calgary and Edmonton. The industry classification concerns the named contributor and does not identify or combine the donations of its employees or owners.
Ronmor describes developing, owning and managing commercial property and land. This business-activity source supports the industry classification; it does not verify a legal corporate-family relationship with any other donor.
Candidate filings only; party and third-party advertiser gifts are excluded. Concentration uses readable itemized amounts, not all fundraising. Incomplete listings can change the result. Business sources verify the named organization’s activities; donation identities retain the name-matching limits of the listings. Shared funding and similar votes do not establish influence.
Saddledome Foundation Flames Game (2024-2025) - Sonya Sharp, 3 Family Members, M Gillies, N Friesen, J Atkinson, J Donnelly, C Gillies (Constituent and Community Volunteer), S Hull (Ward 1 Constituent), B Congram (Ward 1 Constituent), M Jones (Ward 1 Constituent) and B Konwitchny (Ward 1 Constituent)
From the City Clerk's quarterly reports. Spent includes staff salaries, which are not itemized. In a year the seat changed hands the report covers both members.
This view could not be loaded. Check your connection and try again.