Formal municipal climate commitments, targets and strategy decisions, alongside their separate spending and implementation records. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.
Reviewed decisions
3
Sourced statements
0
Evidence last reviewed
Oct 30, 2026
Climate and Environment operating allocations
Explicit amendments to Climate and Environment operating allocations. This is separate from formal targets and declarations; multiple amendments within one annual budget share one scoring weight.
Favoured the reviewed funding reductionsFavoured retaining the reviewed allocations
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.
Council received the tree-equity program update, required annual forestry metrics and directed consideration of future capital funding tied to canopy targets and federal tree-program obligations.
Outcome: Council adopted the directions unanimously. The motion required consideration of 2027–2030 capital funding; it did not approve that funding or prove that canopy targets were reached.
A 2026 budget amendment proposed removing $9 million in one-time Climate and Environment operating expenditures from the Planning and Development Services budget.
Outcome: Council adopted the reduction. This amendment changes a specified operating allocation; it does not rescind every climate policy or establish a measured emissions impact.
Adopt the reporting direction and schedule consideration of capital funding during budget deliberations.
Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.
Approve the $9 million reduction and lower the stated allocation from $38 million to $29 million.
A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.
Reviewed policy choice
Recorded choices remain attached to their proposals. Contextual motions are visible and unscored.
Annual forestry metrics and a future funding consideration are outside both the formal-climate-commitments definition and the specific Climate and Environment operating-allocation measure.
A Yes explicitly reduces the named Climate and Environment allocation. Other budget amendments share the annual budget's scoring group; formal climate declarations use a separate measure.
Attributed statements, recorded choices and campaign commitments retain separate labels. Month/year dates retain their precision; undated records appear last. Promises show their full lifecycle.
Statements and reasons for votes
No sourced statements collected
This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.
These are attributed statements, separate from voting scores. Date filters exclude undated sources.
Promises and actions
No sourced commitments collected
A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.
Commitments and their sourced milestones are shown across their full lifecycle, independently of the vote-date filter.
This view could not be loaded. Check your connection and try again.