Skip to content
PolitiWardCalgary
‹ All issues

Policing & community safety

Police facilities, community-based responses and safety plans, with attention to what each specific proposal would do. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.

Reviewed decisions
1
Sourced statements
0
Evidence last reviewed
Oct 30, 2026

Community-based safety responses

Explicit funding or plan approvals for community-based prevention and wellbeing responses. This measure makes no claim about a member's position on every police budget or the effectiveness of an adopted plan.

Opposed the reviewed community-safety proposalsSupported the reviewed community-safety proposals
Gian-Carlo Carra
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
View chart data

Policy positions

1 row
PersonScore (0–100)Independent decisionsRemove-one lowRemove-one highEvidence statusFirst voteLast vote
Gian-Carlo CarraNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNov 21, 2024Nov 21, 2024
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Decisions and alternatives

Nov 21, 2024 · not_adopted

Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding

A budget amendment proposed shifting $4 million from the Police Service operating variance to the Community Strategies budget for the Community Safety Investment Framework.

Outcome: The transfer first passed 8–7, but Council reconsidered and defeated it 7–8. The final budget included a separate firearms-range funding-source amendment, not this $4 million transfer.

Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026

Position evidence and history

DatePersonDecisionRecorded voteMeaning and scoring rationaleUse
Nov 21, 2024
Gian-Carlo CarraConsider moving $4 million into community-based safety fundingYes
Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding.
This first vote carried before Council reconsidered it; it is not the final outcome or a separate scored decision.
Context / unscored
Nov 21, 2024
Gian-Carlo CarraConsider moving $4 million into community-based safety fundingYes
Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding.
The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety.
Reviewed policy choice
Nov 21, 2024
Gian-Carlo CarraConsider moving $4 million into community-based safety fundingNo
Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program.
The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer.
Context / unscored
Recorded choices remain attached to their proposals. Contextual motions are visible and unscored.

How the record developed

DatePersonRecord typeChoice or statementSource
Nov 21, 2024Gian-Carlo CarraRecorded vote
Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes

This first vote carried before Council reconsidered it; it is not the final outcome or a separate scored decision.

Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Nov 21, 2024Gian-Carlo CarraRecorded vote
Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes

The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety.

Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Nov 21, 2024Gian-Carlo CarraRecorded vote
Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No

The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer.

Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Attributed statements, recorded choices and campaign commitments retain separate labels. Month/year dates retain their precision; undated records appear last. Promises show their full lifecycle.

Statements and reasons for votes

No sourced statements collected

This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.

These are attributed statements, separate from voting scores. Date filters exclude undated sources.

Promises and actions

No sourced commitments collected

A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.

Commitments and their sourced milestones are shown across their full lifecycle, independently of the vote-date filter.