Police facilities, community-based responses and safety plans, with attention to what each specific proposal would do. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.
Explicit funding or plan approvals for community-based prevention and wellbeing responses. This measure makes no claim about a member's position on every police budget or the effectiveness of an adopted plan.
Policy positions
15 rows| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myke Atkinson | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| Andre Chabot | 50 | 2 | 0 | 100 | Mixed choices | Nov 21, 2024 | May 26, 2026 |
| Harrison Clark | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| Raj Dhaliwal | 50 | 2 | 0 | 100 | Mixed choices | Nov 21, 2024 | May 26, 2026 |
| Jeromy Farkas | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| Mike Jamieson | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
| Landon Johnston | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| DJ Kelly | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| Dan McLean | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Reviewed position | Nov 21, 2024 | May 26, 2026 |
| John Pantazopoulos | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| Nathaniel Schmidt | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| Kim Tyers | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| Rob Ward | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
| Jennifer Wyness | 50 | 2 | 0 | 100 | Mixed choices | Nov 21, 2024 | May 26, 2026 |
| Andrew Yule | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | May 26, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
Council directed a report on a proposed enforcement framework addressing visible illicit drug use in public spaces and its effects on residents.
Outcome: Council approved the direction unanimously. This was a request for a proposed framework, not adoption of a new offence, penalty or implemented enforcement approach.
Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Council requested a feasibility and options report on a permanent downtown police district office or multi-service safety and community hub.
Outcome: Council requested a report by Q4 2026. The vote does not establish approval, funding or opening of a facility.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026The plan coordinates social development, prevention, intervention and incident response, with implementation and annual reporting directions.
Outcome: Council adopted the plan. It established the associated advisory committee on July 28 and received implementation information on July 29. The City describes ongoing action planning and a fall 2026 investment proposal; these steps do not prove completed delivery.
City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Council commissioned options on illegal fireworks sales, coordination between enforcement services, community education, shared celebrations and the associated costs.
Outcome: Council approved the review unanimously, with a Q3 2026 reporting deadline. The vote did not itself amend penalties, expand enforcement or fund celebrations.
Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026A budget amendment allocated $9 million in one-time 2026 funding for a tiered transit-security model, phased staffing and six additional Community Outreach Team officers.
Outcome: The amendment passed 9–6. It authorized a combined allocation and requested a Q3 2026 report; this vote alone does not establish hiring, deployment or improved safety.
Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026A budget amendment replaced a $6 million ongoing Mental Health and Addictions Program allocation with $6 million of one-time 2026 funding from the Fiscal Stability Reserve.
Outcome: The amendment passed 9–6 and was incorporated in the budget package. It changes funding continuity and source while retaining the stated $6 million 2026 amount; it does not establish the program's eventual results.
Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026A budget amendment proposed removing $5.7 million of one-time Police Service funding for the stated fleet and helicopter reserve deficit.
Outcome: The removal proposal was defeated 1–14. The amendment result leaves the proposed allocation unchanged at that stage and does not establish purchases or reserve spending.
Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026A budget amendment proposed shifting $4 million from the Police Service operating variance to the Community Strategies budget for the Community Safety Investment Framework.
Outcome: The transfer first passed 8–7, but Council reconsidered and defeated it 7–8. The final budget included a separate firearms-range funding-source amendment, not this $4 million transfer.
Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 28, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Dan McLean | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Dan McLean | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Rob Ward | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | Context / unscored |
Jul 29, 2026 Meeting began Jul 28, 2026 | Rob Ward | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Dan McLean | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
Jun 30, 2026 | Rob Ward | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement | Yes | Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026. Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | No | Reject this study direction. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | No | Reject this study direction. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | No | Reject this study direction. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Study a downtown police office or safety hub | Yes | Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | No | Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed. The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan | Yes | Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting. The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations | Yes | Request the specified options and recommendations report. This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | No | Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | Yes | Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Dan McLean | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | Yes | Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | Yes | Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | Yes | Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | No | Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | Yes | Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | Yes | Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | No | Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | No | Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | No | Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | Yes | Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | Yes | Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | Yes | Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Rob Ward | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package | No | Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components. The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | Yes | Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | Yes | Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Dan McLean | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | Yes | Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | Yes | Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | No | Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | Yes | Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | No | Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | No | Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | Yes | Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | Yes | Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | Yes | Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | No | Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | No | Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | No | Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Rob Ward | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding | Yes | Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding. Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Dan McLean | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | Yes | Remove the proposed $5.7 million one-time allocation. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Rob Ward | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Dan McLean | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Dan McLean | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Dan McLean | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Peter Demong | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Peter Demong | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Peter Demong | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Sean Chu | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Sean Chu | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Sean Chu | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Terry Wong | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Nov 21, 2024 | Terry Wong | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | No | Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program. The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Reviewed policy choice |
Nov 21, 2024 | Terry Wong | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding | Yes | Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding. The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Context / unscored |
| Date / precision | Person | Record type | Choice or statement | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Outcome not verified | Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned. | Milestone source |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No Confirmed minutes PDF page 530 reconvenes the July 28 meeting on July 29; page 531 records the implementation receipt after July 29 attendance markers. Its raw ref retains the meeting-start date. Receipt adds chronology, not another adoption, spending approval or proof of completed results. The vote occurred in the July 29 continuation, after the reconvening marker on PDF page 530; the source meeting is dated July 28. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals. | Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 29, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Vote explanation | Supported Safer Together's coordinated prevention and collaboration on homelessness, violence, poverty and other causes of insecurity. | Yule Council recap, May 29, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Vote explanation | Supported the needs assessment after its scope included a multi-service community safety hub. | Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Vote explanation | Supported coordinated prevention and emergency response with measurable implementation reporting. | Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 27, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Vote explanation | Advocated a Council fire-services committee to address fragmented oversight, delayed planning, rising calls and missed response targets through regular public scrutiny. | Wyness signed rationale, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family. | City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Voted for | Voted for a needs assessment covering a police station or multi-service safety hub; no station opening is established. | Milestone source |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention. | Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff. | Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · Yes Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 2, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Stated position | Supported a downtown police station alongside prevention, mental-health response and Housing First measures. | Farkas: safety policy brief, June 2, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 2, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Campaign commitment | Work with the Police Commission to reopen a permanent downtown police station. | Farkas: safety policy brief, June 2, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Landon Johnston | Stated position | Proposed a fare-gate pilot and more officers, expanding if safety and fare compliance improve. | Question 10 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No This initial carried occurrence preceded reconsideration and is not the final outcome or an independent scored decision. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer. | Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Undated source | Harrison Clark | Stated position | Supported neighbourhood safety hubs, community policing, outreach and a Ward 9 prevention roundtable. | Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Undated source | DJ Kelly | Stated position | Supported greater police presence and behaviour enforcement paired with permanent housing and integrated mental-health crisis response. | Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Undated source | John Pantazopoulos | Stated position | Supported a $9 million station-safety pilot with expanded outreach, seeking safer transit and increased ridership before evaluating results. | Pantazopoulos budget newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Undated source | Harrison Clark | Campaign commitment | Establish a Ward 9 public safety and prevention roundtable. | Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
Supported Safer Together's coordinated prevention and collaboration on homelessness, violence, poverty and other causes of insecurity.
Yule Council recap, May 29, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds public-safety coverage using a separate decision and authored recap; the article's date follows the May 26–27 meeting.
Supported the needs assessment after its scope included a multi-service community safety hub.
Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Preserves qualified support after a scope change, which a bare Yes would conceal.
Supported coordinated prevention and emergency response with measurable implementation reporting.
Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Provides a directly attributed reason for the safety-plan approval while preserving reporting as a future obligation.
Advocated a Council fire-services committee to address fragmented oversight, delayed planning, rising calls and missed response targets through regular public scrutiny.
Wyness signed rationale, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds public-safety governance coverage through her authored explanation; uses the signed May 27 date despite the filename's May 26 vote date.
Supported a downtown police station alongside prevention, mental-health response and Housing First measures.
Farkas: safety policy brief, June 2, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Preserves the combined enforcement and prevention position instead of reducing a mixed safety platform to one label.
Proposed a fare-gate pilot and more officers, expanding if safety and fare compliance improve.
Question 10 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an independent issue and concrete policy choice for a current member with no existing statements.
Supported neighbourhood safety hubs, community policing, outreach and a Ward 9 prevention roundtable.
Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Adds the stated neighbourhood delivery approach while keeping the proposal separate from implemented safety services.
Supported greater police presence and behaviour enforcement paired with permanent housing and integrated mental-health crisis response.
Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Preserves both enforcement and housing/crisis-response proposals, avoiding an inferred single-axis safety position.
Supported a $9 million station-safety pilot with expanded outreach, seeking safer transit and increased ridership before evaluating results.
Pantazopoulos budget newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Broadens a zoning-only profile using an authored budget explanation; no publication date is assigned from the date of the Council vote.
Work with the Police Commission to reopen a permanent downtown police station.
Farkas: safety policy brief, June 2, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Voted for a needs assessment covering a police station or multi-service safety hub; no station opening is established.
Milestone sourceEstablish a Ward 9 public safety and prevention roundtable.
Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.
Milestone source