Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding
Policing & community safety · Dec 1, 2025
What changed
A budget amendment proposed removing $5.7 million of one-time Police Service funding for the stated fleet and helicopter reserve deficit.
Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Why this decision is included
The motion identifies a specific policing-resource tradeoff. It is excluded from the community-prevention measure, which does not define support for police fleet reserves as either endpoint.
How votes are grouped: Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight.
What Yes meant
Remove the proposed $5.7 million one-time allocation.
What No meant
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Alternatives and outcome
Retain the proposed reserve-deficit funding or remove it through this amendment.
The removal proposal was defeated 1–14. The amendment result leaves the proposed allocation unchanged at that stage and does not establish purchases or reserve spending.
not_adoptedA recorded vote or adoption does not establish that a project or service was delivered.
Recorded choices
| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 1, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Dan McLean | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | Yes | Remove the proposed $5.7 million one-time allocation. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Dec 1, 2025 | Rob Ward | Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding | No | Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage. Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding. | Context / unscored |
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.
Published explanations
No sourced statements collected
This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.
Documented policy leadership
No documented leadership entries collected
Sponsorship and committee appointments require an explicit source; a Yes vote alone does not establish either.