Skip to content
PolitiWardCalgary
‹ All issues

Policing & community safety

Police facilities, community-based responses and safety plans, with attention to what each specific proposal would do. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.

Reviewed decisions
1
Sourced statements
0
Evidence last reviewed
Oct 30, 2026

Community-based safety responses

Explicit funding or plan approvals for community-based prevention and wellbeing responses. This measure makes no claim about a member's position on every police budget or the effectiveness of an adopted plan.

Opposed the reviewed community-safety proposalsSupported the reviewed community-safety proposals
Sean Chu
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
View chart data

Policy positions

1 row
PersonScore (0–100)Independent decisionsRemove-one lowRemove-one highEvidence statusFirst voteLast vote
Sean ChuNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNov 21, 2024Nov 21, 2024
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Decisions and alternatives

Nov 21, 2024 · not_adopted

Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding

A budget amendment proposed shifting $4 million from the Police Service operating variance to the Community Strategies budget for the Community Safety Investment Framework.

Outcome: The transfer first passed 8–7, but Council reconsidered and defeated it 7–8. The final budget included a separate firearms-range funding-source amendment, not this $4 million transfer.

Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026

Position evidence and history

DatePersonDecisionRecorded voteMeaning and scoring rationaleUse
Nov 21, 2024
Sean ChuConsider moving $4 million into community-based safety fundingYes
Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding.
This first vote carried before Council reconsidered it; it is not the final outcome or a separate scored decision.
Context / unscored
Nov 21, 2024
Sean ChuConsider moving $4 million into community-based safety fundingNo
Reject the transfer; the vote does not identify a member's position on every prevention program.
The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety.
Reviewed policy choice
Nov 21, 2024
Sean ChuConsider moving $4 million into community-based safety fundingYes
Approve this specific transfer to community-based safety funding.
The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer.
Context / unscored
Recorded choices remain attached to their proposals. Contextual motions are visible and unscored.

How the record developed

DatePersonRecord typeChoice or statementSource
Nov 21, 2024Sean ChuRecorded vote
Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes

This first vote carried before Council reconsidered it; it is not the final outcome or a separate scored decision.

Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Nov 21, 2024Sean ChuRecorded vote
Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · No

The final substantive vote after reconsideration rejected the explicit transfer; a Yes would have directed funding toward community-based safety.

Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Nov 21, 2024Sean ChuRecorded vote
Consider moving $4 million into community-based safety funding · Yes

The procedural decision to reconsider reopened the question and does not itself establish support for the transfer.

Confirmed 2024 Council minutes, PDF pages 798–799 and final budget at page 821 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Attributed statements, recorded choices and campaign commitments retain separate labels. Month/year dates retain their precision; undated records appear last. Promises show their full lifecycle.

Statements and reasons for votes

No sourced statements collected

This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.

These are attributed statements, separate from voting scores. Date filters exclude undated sources.

Promises and actions

No sourced commitments collected

A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.

Commitments and their sourced milestones are shown across their full lifecycle, independently of the vote-date filter.