Major projects & public facilities

Public commitments to major facilities and infrastructure, from early planning through funding and construction. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.

Policy measure

People shown

Focus on a person

From

Through

Reset filters

Reviewed decisions

Sourced statements

Evidence last reviewed

Oct 29, 2026

Public funding for the Event Centre

Specific public financial commitments to the Event Centre project, including the original project and the replacement agreement. These are different proposals across time; a vote is not a generic position on all major projects.

Opposed the reviewed public commitmentsSupported the reviewed public commitments

Courtney Walcott

Insufficient voting evidence

1 reviewed decision

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Courtney Walcott	Not available	1	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Apr 25, 2023	Apr 25, 2023

Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Decisions and alternatives

Apr 25, 2023 · adopted

Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework

Council approved a replacement partnership and financial framework for an Event Centre, community rink and district infrastructure.

Outcome: Council adopted the recommendations. The released City report describes the financial framework; approval did not establish construction completion.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Position evidence and history

Date	Person	Decision	Recorded vote	Meaning and scoring rationale	Use
Apr 25, 2023	Courtney Walcott	Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework	Yes	Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments. PolitiWard's automatic topic rules label this vote procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, but the released report shows Council adopted substantive financial commitments. This interpretation follows the public report, not the automatic label.	Reviewed policy choice

Recorded choices remain attached to their proposals. Contextual motions are visible and unscored.

How the record developed

Date	Person	Record type	Choice or statement	Source
Apr 25, 2023	Courtney Walcott	Recorded vote	Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes PolitiWard's automatic topic rules label this vote procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, but the released report shows Council adopted substantive financial commitments. This interpretation follows the public report, not the automatic label.	Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Attributed statements, recorded choices and campaign commitments retain separate labels. Month/year dates retain their precision; undated records appear last. Promises show their full lifecycle.

Statements and reasons for votes

No sourced statements collected

This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.

These are attributed statements, separate from voting scores. Date filters exclude undated sources.

Promises and actions

No sourced commitments collected

A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.

Commitments and their sourced milestones are shown across their full lifecycle, independently of the vote-date filter.