Skip to content
PolitiWardCalgary
‹ All issues

Major projects & public facilities

Public commitments to major facilities and infrastructure, from early planning through funding and construction. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.

Reviewed decisions
4
Sourced statements
8
Evidence last reviewed
Oct 29, 2026

Public funding for the Event Centre

Specific public financial commitments to the Event Centre project, including the original project and the replacement agreement. These are different proposals across time; a vote is not a generic position on all major projects.

Opposed the reviewed public commitmentsSupported the reviewed public commitments
Myke Atkinson
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
Andre Chabot
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Harrison Clark
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
Raj Dhaliwal
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Jeromy Farkas
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Mike Jamieson
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
Landon Johnston
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
DJ Kelly
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
Dan McLean
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
John Pantazopoulos
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
Nathaniel Schmidt
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
Kim Tyers
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
Rob Ward
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
Jennifer Wyness
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Andrew Yule
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
View chart data

Policy positions

15 rows
PersonScore (0–100)Independent decisionsRemove-one lowRemove-one highEvidence statusFirst voteLast vote
Myke AtkinsonNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Andre ChabotNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceApr 25, 2023Apr 25, 2023
Harrison ClarkNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Raj DhaliwalNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceApr 25, 2023Apr 25, 2023
Jeromy FarkasNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceJul 26, 2021Jul 26, 2021
Mike JamiesonNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Landon JohnstonNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
DJ KellyNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Dan McLeanNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceApr 25, 2023Apr 25, 2023
John PantazopoulosNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Nathaniel SchmidtNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Kim TyersNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Rob WardNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Jennifer WynessNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceApr 25, 2023Apr 25, 2023
Andrew YuleNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Decisions and alternatives

Position evidence and history

DatePersonDecisionRecorded voteMeaning and scoring rationaleUse
Jun 30, 2026
Andre ChabotUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateNo
Decline this mandate-development direction.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Andrew YuleUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Dan McLeanUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
DJ KellyUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Harrison ClarkUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Jennifer WynessUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateNo
Decline this mandate-development direction.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Jeromy FarkasUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
John PantazopoulosUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Kim TyersUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Landon JohnstonUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Mike JamiesonUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Myke AtkinsonUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Nathaniel SchmidtUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Raj DhaliwalUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Rob WardUpdate the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandateYes
Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Andre ChabotFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Andrew YuleFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Dan McLeanFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
DJ KellyFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Harrison ClarkFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Jennifer WynessFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Jeromy FarkasFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
John PantazopoulosFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Kim TyersFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Landon JohnstonFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Mike JamiesonFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Myke AtkinsonFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Nathaniel SchmidtFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Raj DhaliwalFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Rob WardFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Apr 25, 2023
Andre ChabotApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Courtney WalcottApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Dan McLeanApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Evan SpencerApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Gian-Carlo CarraApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Jasmine MianApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Jennifer WynessApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Jyoti GondekApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Kourtney PennerApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Peter DemongApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Raj DhaliwalApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Richard PootmansApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Sean ChuApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Sonya SharpApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Apr 25, 2023
Terry WongApprove the replacement Event Centre financial frameworkYes
Adopt the revised recommendations approving the agreement framework and public commitments.
Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Diane Colley-UrquhartAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsYes
Approve up to $10 million of additional capital funding from projected reserve interest income.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Druh FarrellAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsNo
Reject that additional appropriation.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Evan WoolleyAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsNo
Reject that additional appropriation.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
George ChahalAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsNo
Reject that additional appropriation.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Gian-Carlo CarraAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsYes
Approve up to $10 million of additional capital funding from projected reserve interest income.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Jeff DavisonAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsYes
Approve up to $10 million of additional capital funding from projected reserve interest income.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Jeromy FarkasAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsNo
Reject that additional appropriation.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Joe MaglioccaAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsYes
Approve up to $10 million of additional capital funding from projected reserve interest income.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Jyoti GondekAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsNo
Reject that additional appropriation.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Naheed NenshiAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsYes
Approve up to $10 million of additional capital funding from projected reserve interest income.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Peter DemongAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsYes
Approve up to $10 million of additional capital funding from projected reserve interest income.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Sean ChuAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsNo
Reject that additional appropriation.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Shane KeatingAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsYes
Approve up to $10 million of additional capital funding from projected reserve interest income.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Jul 26, 2021
Ward SutherlandAdd up to $10 million for Event Centre City costsYes
Approve up to $10 million of additional capital funding from projected reserve interest income.
The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.
Reviewed policy choice
Recorded choices remain attached to their proposals. Contextual motions are visible and unscored.

How the record developed

Date / precisionPersonRecord typeChoice or statementSource
Oct 29, 2026DJ KellyOutcome not verified
Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.
Milestone source
Jun 30, 2026Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · No

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026DJ KellyRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · No

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Kim TyersRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Mike JamiesonRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Rob WardRecorded vote
Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
June 2026Rob WardStated position
Advocated examining charitable donation and tax-receipt mechanisms to improve community associations' facility funding, sustainability and fundraising.
Ward June 2026 newsletter, page 1 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025DJ KellyRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Kim TyersRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Mike JamiesonRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Rob WardRecorded vote
Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
December 2025Mike JamiesonVote explanation
Supported $28.7 million for recreation-facility planning and design to prepare projects for construction when further funding becomes available.
Jamieson budget rationale, page 4 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Oct 5, 2025Raj DhaliwalStated position
Supported completing Country Hills Boulevard widening on schedule and further improvements to safe, convenient travel in Ward 5.
Dhaliwal roadway statement, October 5, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Sep 8, 2025Jeromy FarkasStated position
Proposed publishing capital projects' operating and maintenance costs before approval, alongside clearer contracts, reserves and debt information.
Farkas: financial responsibility policy brief, September 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
2024Dan McLeanStated position
Advocated planning a park at the Priddis wetland site that combines recreation with protection of the natural environment.
McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Oct 5, 2023Jyoti GondekStated position
Welcomed the signed Event Centre agreements, citing investor confidence, public spaces, transportation links, tourism and jobs.
City: final Event Centre agreements, October 5, 2023 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Oct 5, 2023Sonya SharpStated position
Supported the Event Centre agreement as a downtown investment connecting sports, culture, commercial activity and public amenities.
City: final Event Centre agreements, October 5, 2023 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Courtney WalcottRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Evan SpencerRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Gian-Carlo CarraRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Jasmine MianRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Jyoti GondekRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Kourtney PennerRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Peter DemongRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Richard PootmansRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Sean ChuRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Sonya SharpRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Apr 25, 2023Terry WongRecorded vote
Approve the replacement Event Centre financial framework · Yes

Although the automated motion classifier calls this procedural because it includes confidentiality directions, the released report shows adoption of substantive financial commitments. The reviewed interpretation uses the public report, not the keyword label.

Released City report C2023-0482, April 25 Event Centre financial framework · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Diane Colley-UrquhartRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · Yes

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Druh FarrellRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · No

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Evan WoolleyRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · No

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021George ChahalRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · No

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Gian-Carlo CarraRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · Yes

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Jeff DavisonRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · Yes

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · No

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Joe MaglioccaRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · Yes

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Jyoti GondekRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · No

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Naheed NenshiRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · Yes

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Peter DemongRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · Yes

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Sean ChuRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · No

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Shane KeatingRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · Yes

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Jul 26, 2021Ward SutherlandRecorded vote
Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · Yes

The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Undated sourceJohn PantazopoulosStated position
Supported $3 million for West District YMCA and library design and permitting, citing pressure on Westside Recreation's capacity.
Pantazopoulos budget newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Undated sourceDJ KellyCampaign commitmentCreate a dedicated recreation capital fund supported by a property-tax share and one quarter of City surpluses.Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Attributed statements, recorded choices and campaign commitments retain separate labels. Month/year dates retain their precision; undated records appear last. Promises show their full lifecycle.

Statements and reasons for votes

Stated position · June 2026 · Rob Ward

Advocated examining charitable donation and tax-receipt mechanisms to improve community associations' facility funding, sustainability and fundraising.

Ward June 2026 newsletter, page 1 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds a concrete community-infrastructure funding proposal; an exploration is not treated as a functioning new tax-receipt program.

Explanation of vote · December 2025 · Mike Jamieson

Supported $28.7 million for recreation-facility planning and design to prepare projects for construction when further funding becomes available.

Jamieson budget rationale, page 4 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds an explicit issue-specific voting explanation for an uncovered current member; the report is signed December 2025, so only month precision is assigned.

Stated position · Oct 5, 2025 · Raj Dhaliwal

Supported completing Country Hills Boulevard widening on schedule and further improvements to safe, convenient travel in Ward 5.

Dhaliwal roadway statement, October 5, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds a named capital-project priority from a dated authored campaign statement; completion is a stated aim rather than verified delivery.

Stated position · Sep 8, 2025 · Jeromy Farkas

Proposed publishing capital projects' operating and maintenance costs before approval, alongside clearer contracts, reserves and debt information.

Farkas: financial responsibility policy brief, September 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds the proposed financial-disclosure standard for capital projects rather than inferring a position from one project vote.

Stated position · 2024 · Dan McLean

Advocated planning a park at the Priddis wetland site that combines recreation with protection of the natural environment.

McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds first issue coverage for an uncovered current member from his signed 2024 newsletter; layout timestamps are not treated as publication dates.

Stated position · Oct 5, 2023 · Jyoti Gondek

Welcomed the signed Event Centre agreements, citing investor confidence, public spaces, transportation links, tourism and jobs.

City: final Event Centre agreements, October 5, 2023 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Records the mayor’s public rationale for the signed agreements without treating anticipated benefits as established outcomes.

Stated position · Oct 5, 2023 · Sonya Sharp

Supported the Event Centre agreement as a downtown investment connecting sports, culture, commercial activity and public amenities.

City: final Event Centre agreements, October 5, 2023 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds an attributed explanation of the replacement agreement’s anticipated benefits, separate from proof of delivery.

Stated position · Undated source · John Pantazopoulos

Supported $3 million for West District YMCA and library design and permitting, citing pressure on Westside Recreation's capacity.

Pantazopoulos budget newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Broadens a zoning-only profile using an authored budget explanation; no publication date is assigned from the date of the Council vote.

These are attributed statements, separate from voting scores. Date filters exclude undated sources.

Promises and actions

Campaign commitment · Undated source · DJ Kelly

Create a dedicated recreation capital fund supported by a property-tax share and one quarter of City surpluses.

Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
  1. Oct 29, 2026 · Outcome not verified

    Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.

    Milestone source
Commitments and their sourced milestones are shown across their full lifecycle, independently of the vote-date filter.