Skip to content
PolitiWardCalgary
‹ Major projects & public facilities

Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities

Major projects & public facilities · Dec 2, 2025

What changed

A budget amendment allocated $28.7 million of 2026 capital budget from the Fiscal Stability Reserve for planning and design of recreation and sport facilities.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Why this decision is included

A substantial recreation planning allocation broadens project evidence while separating design work from authorization to construct and from Event Centre funding.

How votes are grouped: Choices within this annual budget share one family per measure. Separate amendments and duplicate tabulations cannot multiply the budget’s influence; unscored choices add no weight.

What Yes meant

Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.

What No meant

Reject this allocation amendment.

Alternatives and outcome

Approve this planning package or retain, revise or reprioritize the existing capital allocation.

Council adopted the allocation. Planning and design funding is distinct from a commitment to construct every facility.

adopted
A recorded vote or adoption does not establish that a project or service was delivered.

Recorded choices

DatePersonDecisionRecorded voteMeaning and scoring rationaleUse
Dec 2, 2025
Andre ChabotFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Andrew YuleFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Dan McLeanFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
DJ KellyFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Harrison ClarkFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Jennifer WynessFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Jeromy FarkasFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
John PantazopoulosFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Kim TyersFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Landon JohnstonFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Mike JamiesonFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Myke AtkinsonFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Nathaniel SchmidtFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Raj DhaliwalFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Rob WardFund planning for nine GamePLAN facility prioritiesYes
Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Published explanations

Explanation of vote · December 2025 · Mike Jamieson

Supported $28.7 million for recreation-facility planning and design to prepare projects for construction when further funding becomes available.

Jamieson budget rationale, page 4 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds an explicit issue-specific voting explanation for an uncovered current member; the report is signed December 2025, so only month precision is assigned.

Documented policy leadership

No documented leadership entries collected

Sponsorship and committee appointments require an explicit source; a Yes vote alone does not establish either.