Transit & transportation

Rail and bus plans, fares and mobility choices; approving a route is distinct from approving construction funding or delivering service. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.

Policy measure

People shown

Focus on a person

From

Through

Reset filters

Reviewed decisions

Sourced statements

Evidence last reviewed

Date not recorded

Advancing the Green Line rail program

Explicit approvals to advance the Green Line program. Choices between two rail alignments and a wind-down after another government's funding withdrawal are explained separately and do not automatically count as opposition to rail.

Opposed the reviewed advancement proposalsSupported the reviewed advancement proposals

Brian Thiessen

Insufficient voting evidence

0 reviewed decisions

View chart data

Policy positions

1 row

Person	Score (0–100)	Independent decisions	Remove-one low	Remove-one high	Evidence status	First vote	Last vote
Brian Thiessen	Not available	0	Not available	Not available	Insufficient voting evidence	Not available	Not available

Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Decisions and alternatives

No reviewed decisions match

Widen the dates or choose another person.

Position evidence and history

No reviewed votes match

Try another person or date range. Unrecorded choices do not receive a score.

Recorded choices remain attached to their proposals. Contextual motions are visible and unscored.

How the record developed

Date	Person	Record type	Choice or statement	Source
2025	Brian Thiessen	Stated position	Supported completing the Green Line.	CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Attributed statements, recorded choices and campaign commitments retain separate labels. Month/year dates retain their precision; undated records appear last. Promises show their full lifecycle.

Statements and reasons for votes

Stated position · 2025 · Brian Thiessen

Supported completing the Green Line.

CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026

Why this statement was collected

A named candidate’s original answer to the same Green Line question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. A response is not a recorded programme authorization.

These are attributed statements, separate from voting scores. Date filters exclude undated sources.

Promises and actions

No sourced commitments collected

A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.

Commitments and their sourced milestones are shown across their full lifecycle, independently of the vote-date filter.