Skip to content
PolitiWardCalgary
‹ All issues

Policing & community safety

Police facilities, community-based responses and safety plans, with attention to what each specific proposal would do. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.

Reviewed decisions
7
Sourced statements
5
Evidence last reviewed
Oct 30, 2026

Community-based safety responses

Explicit funding or plan approvals for community-based prevention and wellbeing responses. This measure makes no claim about a member's position on every police budget or the effectiveness of an adopted plan.

Opposed the reviewed community-safety proposalsSupported the reviewed community-safety proposals
Myke Atkinson
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Andre Chabot
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Harrison Clark
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Raj Dhaliwal
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Jeromy Farkas
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Mike Jamieson
Insufficient voting evidence
0 reviewed decisions
Landon Johnston
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
DJ Kelly
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Dan McLean
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
John Pantazopoulos
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Nathaniel Schmidt
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Kim Tyers
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Rob Ward
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Jennifer Wyness
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
Andrew Yule
Insufficient voting evidence
1 reviewed decision
View chart data

Policy positions

15 rows
PersonScore (0–100)Independent decisionsRemove-one lowRemove-one highEvidence statusFirst voteLast vote
Myke AtkinsonNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Andre ChabotNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Harrison ClarkNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Raj DhaliwalNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Jeromy FarkasNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Mike JamiesonNot available0Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceNot availableNot available
Landon JohnstonNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
DJ KellyNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Dan McLeanNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
John PantazopoulosNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Nathaniel SchmidtNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Kim TyersNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Rob WardNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Jennifer WynessNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Andrew YuleNot available1Not availableNot availableInsufficient voting evidenceMay 26, 2026May 26, 2026
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.

Decisions and alternatives

May 26, 2026 · in_progress

Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan

The plan coordinates social development, prevention, intervention and incident response, with implementation and annual reporting directions.

Outcome: Council adopted the plan. It established the associated advisory committee on July 28 and received implementation information on July 29. The City describes ongoing action planning and a fall 2026 investment proposal; these steps do not prove completed delivery.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025 · adopted

Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations

Council commissioned options on illegal fireworks sales, coordination between enforcement services, community education, shared celebrations and the associated costs.

Outcome: Council approved the review unanimously, with a Q3 2026 reporting deadline. The vote did not itself amend penalties, expand enforcement or fund celebrations.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025 · adopted

Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding

A budget amendment replaced a $6 million ongoing Mental Health and Addictions Program allocation with $6 million of one-time 2026 funding from the Fiscal Stability Reserve.

Outcome: The amendment passed 9–6 and was incorporated in the budget package. It changes funding continuity and source while retaining the stated $6 million 2026 amount; it does not establish the program's eventual results.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026

Position evidence and history

DatePersonDecisionRecorded voteMeaning and scoring rationaleUse
Jul 28, 2026
Andre ChabotAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Andre ChabotAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Andrew YuleAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Andrew YuleAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Dan McLeanAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Dan McLeanAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
DJ KellyAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Harrison ClarkAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Harrison ClarkAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Jennifer WynessAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Jennifer WynessAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Jeromy FarkasAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Jeromy FarkasAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
John PantazopoulosAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
John PantazopoulosAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Kim TyersAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Kim TyersAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Landon JohnstonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Landon JohnstonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Mike JamiesonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Mike JamiesonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Myke AtkinsonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Myke AtkinsonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Nathaniel SchmidtAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Nathaniel SchmidtAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Raj DhaliwalAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Raj DhaliwalAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jul 28, 2026
Rob WardAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.
Context / unscored
Jul 29, 2026
Meeting began Jul 28, 2026
Rob WardAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Andre ChabotRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Andrew YuleRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Dan McLeanRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
DJ KellyRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Harrison ClarkRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Jennifer WynessRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Jeromy FarkasRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
John PantazopoulosRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Kim TyersRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Landon JohnstonRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Mike JamiesonRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Myke AtkinsonRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Nathaniel SchmidtRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Raj DhaliwalRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
Jun 30, 2026
Rob WardRequest a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcementYes
Require the proposed framework report by Q4 2026.
Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Andre ChabotStudy a downtown police office or safety hubNo
Reject this study direction.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Andrew YuleStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Dan McLeanStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
DJ KellyStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Harrison ClarkStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Jennifer WynessStudy a downtown police office or safety hubNo
Reject this study direction.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Jeromy FarkasStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
John PantazopoulosStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Kim TyersStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Landon JohnstonStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Myke AtkinsonStudy a downtown police office or safety hubNo
Reject this study direction.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Nathaniel SchmidtStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Raj DhaliwalStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Rob WardStudy a downtown police office or safety hubYes
Commission the options report in consultation with the Police Commission, Police Service and province.
This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Andre ChabotAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Andre ChabotAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Andrew YuleAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Andrew YuleAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Dan McLeanAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Dan McLeanAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
DJ KellyAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
DJ KellyAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Harrison ClarkAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Harrison ClarkAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Jennifer WynessAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Jennifer WynessAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Jeromy FarkasAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Jeromy FarkasAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
John PantazopoulosAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
John PantazopoulosAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Kim TyersAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Kim TyersAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Landon JohnstonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Landon JohnstonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Myke AtkinsonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Myke AtkinsonAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Nathaniel SchmidtAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Nathaniel SchmidtAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Raj DhaliwalAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Raj DhaliwalAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
May 26, 2026
Rob WardAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planNo
Reject this plan package; the vote does not isolate which elements a member disputed.
The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.
Reviewed policy choice
May 26, 2026
Rob WardAdopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing planYes
Approve the plan package and require implementation reporting.
The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Andre ChabotReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Andrew YuleReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Dan McLeanReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
DJ KellyReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Harrison ClarkReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Jennifer WynessReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Jeromy FarkasReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
John PantazopoulosReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Kim TyersReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Landon JohnstonReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Mike JamiesonReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Myke AtkinsonReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Nathaniel SchmidtReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Raj DhaliwalReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 15, 2025
Rob WardReview fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrationsYes
Request the specified options and recommendations report.
This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Andre ChabotFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageNo
Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Andrew YuleFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageYes
Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Dan McLeanFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageYes
Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
DJ KellyFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageYes
Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Harrison ClarkFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageYes
Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Jennifer WynessFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageNo
Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Jeromy FarkasFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageYes
Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
John PantazopoulosFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageYes
Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Kim TyersFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageNo
Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Landon JohnstonFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageNo
Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Mike JamiesonFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageNo
Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Myke AtkinsonFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageYes
Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Nathaniel SchmidtFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageYes
Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Raj DhaliwalFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageYes
Approve the combined transit security, staffing and outreach allocation and reporting direction.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 2, 2025
Rob WardFund a combined transit-security and outreach packageNo
Reject this combined package rather than any one of its individual components.
The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Andre ChabotReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingYes
Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Andrew YuleReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingYes
Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Dan McLeanReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingYes
Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
DJ KellyReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingYes
Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Harrison ClarkReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingNo
Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Jennifer WynessReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingYes
Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Jeromy FarkasReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingNo
Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
John PantazopoulosReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingNo
Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Kim TyersReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingYes
Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Landon JohnstonReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingYes
Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Mike JamiesonReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingYes
Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Myke AtkinsonReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingNo
Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Nathaniel SchmidtReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingNo
Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Raj DhaliwalReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingNo
Reject the proposed funding-duration and source change.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Rob WardReplace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time fundingYes
Approve the switch from ongoing funding to the specified one-time reserve funding.
Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Andre ChabotConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Andrew YuleConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Dan McLeanConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
DJ KellyConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Harrison ClarkConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Jennifer WynessConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Jeromy FarkasConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
John PantazopoulosConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Kim TyersConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Landon JohnstonConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Mike JamiesonConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Myke AtkinsonConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingYes
Remove the proposed $5.7 million one-time allocation.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Nathaniel SchmidtConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Raj DhaliwalConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Dec 1, 2025
Rob WardConsider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve fundingNo
Reject this removal and retain the allocation at this amendment stage.
Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.
Context / unscored
Recorded choices remain attached to their proposals. Contextual motions are visible and unscored.

How the record developed

DatePersonRecord typeChoice or statementSource
Oct 29, 2026Harrison ClarkOutcome not verified
Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.
Milestone source
Jul 29, 2026Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026DJ KellyRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Kim TyersRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Mike JamiesonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Rob WardRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

Council received the plan's implementation update on July 29, when the meeting that began July 28 continued (confirmed minutes, PDF pages 530–531). The City's vote record dates it to the meeting's start, July 28. Receiving the update adds to the timeline; it is not another adoption, a spending approval or proof of results.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Kim TyersRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Mike JamiesonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jul 28, 2026Rob WardRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

Formation of the associated advisory committee is governance implementation of the same plan; it is not an independent prevention-policy score.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026DJ KellyRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Kim TyersRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Mike JamiesonRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Rob WardRecorded vote
Request a framework for public illicit-drug-use enforcement · Yes

Commissioning a proposed enforcement framework does not identify support for or opposition to the reviewed community-based prevention proposals.

Confirmed June 30, 2026 Council minutes, PDF page 420 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 29, 2026Andrew YuleVote explanation
Supported Safer Together's coordinated prevention and collaboration on homelessness, violence, poverty and other causes of insecurity.
Yule Council recap, May 29, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 27, 2026Nathaniel SchmidtVote explanation
Supported the needs assessment after its scope included a multi-service community safety hub.
Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 27, 2026Nathaniel SchmidtVote explanation
Supported coordinated prevention and emergency response with measurable implementation reporting.
Schmidt: vote explanations, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 27, 2026Jennifer WynessVote explanation
Advocated a Council fire-services committee to address fragmented oversight, delayed planning, rising calls and missed response targets through regular public scrutiny.
Wyness signed rationale, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · No

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026DJ KellyRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · No

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Kim TyersRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · No

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Rob WardRecorded vote
Study a downtown police office or safety hub · Yes

This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum.

City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
May 26, 2026Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026DJ KellyRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026DJ KellyRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Kim TyersRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Kim TyersRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Rob WardRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · No

The primary package explicitly adopts the coordinated community prevention and wellbeing plan.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Rob WardRecorded vote
Adopt the Safer Together safety and wellbeing plan · Yes

The defeated referral sought further collaboration and redesign of the same plan, and is not a second scored policy family.

City of Calgary — Safer Together plan and implementation steps · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
May 26, 2026Jeromy FarkasVoted for
Voted for a needs assessment covering a police station or multi-service safety hub; no station opening is established.
Milestone source
Dec 15, 2025Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025DJ KellyRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Kim TyersRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Mike JamiesonRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 15, 2025Rob WardRecorded vote
Review fireworks enforcement, outreach and shared celebrations · Yes

This commissions options covering multiple approaches rather than adopting an identifiable community-prevention intervention.

Confirmed December 15, 2025 Council minutes, PDF pages 658–659 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025DJ KellyRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Kim TyersRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Mike JamiesonRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · Yes

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 2, 2025Rob WardRecorded vote
Fund a combined transit-security and outreach package · No

The vote simultaneously funds peace-officer enforcement, fixed security posts, contracted guards and outreach; it cannot identify a separate preference for community prevention.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF pages 593–594 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025DJ KellyRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Kim TyersRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Mike JamiesonRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · No

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Rob WardRecorded vote
Replace ongoing mental-health funding with one-time funding · Yes

Funding duration and funding source change together while the stated 2026 amount remains $6 million; a single support-versus-opposition direction would conceal that tradeoff.

Confirmed November 2025 Council meeting continued December 1, PDF page 582 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Andre ChabotRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Andrew YuleRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Dan McLeanRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025DJ KellyRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Harrison ClarkRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Jennifer WynessRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Jeromy FarkasRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025John PantazopoulosRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Kim TyersRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Landon JohnstonRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Mike JamiesonRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Myke AtkinsonRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · Yes

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Nathaniel SchmidtRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Raj DhaliwalRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Dec 1, 2025Rob WardRecorded vote
Consider removing police fleet and helicopter reserve funding · No

Police fleet and helicopter reserve funding is a different policy choice from community-based prevention and wellbeing funding.

Confirmed 2025 budget minutes, PDF page 587 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Jun 2, 2025Jeromy FarkasCampaign commitmentWork with the Police Commission to reopen a permanent downtown police station.Farkas: safety policy brief, June 2, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
2025Landon JohnstonStated position
Proposed a fare-gate pilot and more officers, expanding if safety and fare compliance improve.
Question 10 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Undated sourceHarrison ClarkCampaign commitmentEstablish a Ward 9 public safety and prevention roundtable.Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
Attributed statements, recorded choices and campaign commitments retain separate labels. Month/year dates retain their precision; undated records appear last. Promises show their full lifecycle.

Statements and reasons for votes

Explanation of vote · May 29, 2026 · Andrew Yule

Supported Safer Together's coordinated prevention and collaboration on homelessness, violence, poverty and other causes of insecurity.

Yule Council recap, May 29, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds public-safety coverage using a separate decision and authored recap; the article's date follows the May 26–27 meeting.

Explanation of vote · May 27, 2026 · Jennifer Wyness

Advocated a Council fire-services committee to address fragmented oversight, delayed planning, rising calls and missed response targets through regular public scrutiny.

Wyness signed rationale, May 27, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds public-safety governance coverage through her authored explanation; uses the signed May 27 date despite the filename's May 26 vote date.

Stated position · 2025 · Landon Johnston

Proposed a fare-gate pilot and more officers, expanding if safety and fare compliance improve.

Question 10 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026
Why this statement was collected

Adds an independent issue and concrete policy choice for a current member with no existing statements.

These are attributed statements, separate from voting scores. Date filters exclude undated sources.

Promises and actions

Campaign commitment · Undated source · Harrison Clark

Establish a Ward 9 public safety and prevention roundtable.

Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026
  1. Oct 29, 2026 · Outcome not verified

    Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.

    Milestone source
Commitments and their sourced milestones are shown across their full lifecycle, independently of the vote-date filter.