Public commitments to major facilities and infrastructure, from early planning through funding and construction. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.
Specific public financial commitments to the Event Centre project, including the original project and the replacement agreement. These are different proposals across time; a vote is not a generic position on all major projects.
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeromy Farkas | Not available | 1 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Jul 26, 2021 | Jul 26, 2021 |
Council directed a refreshed mandate and bylaw for coordinating the fieldhouse and other strategic sport infrastructure opportunities.
Outcome: Council directed a Q4 2026 report. The resolution itself did not fund or authorize construction of the fieldhouse.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A budget amendment allocated $28.7 million of 2026 capital budget from the Fiscal Stability Reserve for planning and design of recreation and sport facilities.
Outcome: Council adopted the allocation. Planning and design funding is distinct from a commitment to construct every facility.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Council considered an additional capital appropriation for anticipated City costs under the then-current Event Centre project.
Outcome: The appropriation carried 8–6. This records a commitment under the earlier project, not completion of the later replacement facility.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 30, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate | Yes | Request an updated mandate, bylaw and reporting framework. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 2, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities | Yes | Approve the planning and design allocation for the listed facility priorities. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jul 26, 2021 | Jeromy Farkas | Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs | No | Reject that additional appropriation. The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project. | Reviewed policy choice |
| Date | Person | Record type | Choice or statement | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Update the Multisport Fieldhouse Committee's mandate · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Fund planning for nine GamePLAN facility priorities · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Stated position | Proposed publishing capital projects' operating and maintenance costs before approval, alongside clearer contracts, reserves and debt information. | Farkas: financial responsibility policy brief, September 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 26, 2021 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Add up to $10 million for Event Centre City costs · No The resolution explicitly adds public capital funding to the Event Centre project. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
Proposed publishing capital projects' operating and maintenance costs before approval, alongside clearer contracts, reserves and debt information.
Farkas: financial responsibility policy brief, September 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Adds the proposed financial-disclosure standard for capital projects rather than inferring a position from one project vote.
A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.