How municipal services and capital projects are financed, including the particular borrowing authorities Council approves. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.
Final readings of specified capital borrowing bylaws. This is a record of support for these particular debt-financed projects, not a general tax, spending or fiscal-conservatism score; utility-supported and tax-supported debt may differ.
Policy positions
15 rows| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myke Atkinson | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Andre Chabot | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Harrison Clark | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Raj Dhaliwal | 100 | 2 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Jeromy Farkas | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Mike Jamieson | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Landon Johnston | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| DJ Kelly | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Dan McLean | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| John Pantazopoulos | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Nathaniel Schmidt | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Kim Tyers | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Rob Ward | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Jennifer Wyness | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Andrew Yule | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 27, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
Bylaw 8B2026 provided financing authority for Calgary's $51 million portion of the Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension.
Outcome: Council gave final readings. The earlier report describes recovery through wastewater rates and off-site levies; the vote does not prove project completion.
City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026The pilot would test potential benefits across three business units, with $1 million of one-time 2026 funding and further funding considered in the next budget cycle.
Outcome: Council approved the pilot and required phase-two findings by Q3 2027. Realized savings are not established by the approval.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026The package authorized up to $251 million of borrowing and lending for ENMAX's regulated capital program, including systems, buildings, equipment and technology.
Outcome: Council passed the package. Authorizing debt and lending does not establish a new municipal property-tax rate.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Bylaw 8B2025 authorized capital borrowing for City vehicles and equipment.
Outcome: Final reading passed unanimously. The authority does not establish how much was later borrowed.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Council directed a 0.25 percentage-point annual shift in tax share from non-residential to residential property over eight years starting in 2027.
Outcome: Council adopted the direction. This distributes the tax burden between property classes; it does not by itself set total municipal spending.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Council requested the work plan, selection criteria, business-unit priorities and proposed schedule for a zero-based review program.
Outcome: Council adopted the direction. It authorized scoping, not a completed whole-of-City review or proven savings.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 30, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Dan McLean | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 30, 2026 | Rob Ward | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk | Yes | Give the borrowing bylaw second and third readings. First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Dan McLean | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | No | Reject this pilot package. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | No | Reject this pilot package. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Mar 31, 2026 | Rob Ward | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot | Yes | Approve the pilot, its initial funding and reporting requirements. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Feb 24, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Dan McLean | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 24, 2026 | Rob Ward | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending | Yes | Approve the capital borrowing and lending bylaws. This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Dan McLean | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Dan McLean | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Rob Ward | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Rob Ward | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment | Yes | Give the capital borrowing bylaw final reading. First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | No | Reject this proposed distribution of tax share. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | Yes | Approve this phased tax-share direction for the next budget cycle. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Dan McLean | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | No | Reject this proposed distribution of tax share. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | Yes | Approve this phased tax-share direction for the next budget cycle. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | Yes | Approve this phased tax-share direction for the next budget cycle. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | No | Reject this proposed distribution of tax share. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | Yes | Approve this phased tax-share direction for the next budget cycle. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | Yes | Approve this phased tax-share direction for the next budget cycle. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | No | Reject this proposed distribution of tax share. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | No | Reject this proposed distribution of tax share. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | Yes | Approve this phased tax-share direction for the next budget cycle. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | Yes | Approve this phased tax-share direction for the next budget cycle. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | No | Reject this proposed distribution of tax share. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | Yes | Approve this phased tax-share direction for the next budget cycle. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Rob Ward | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property | No | Reject this proposed distribution of tax share. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Dan McLean | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Dec 3, 2025 | Rob Ward | Scope a zero-based budget review program | Yes | Direct preparation of the review program's scope. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
| Date / precision | Person | Record type | Choice or statement | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2026 | Rob Ward | Stated position | Favoured concentrating the next four-year budget on infrastructure, safety and essential services rather than raising taxes for programs he considers non-core. | Ward September 2026 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes The May report specifies the $51 million self-supported debt purpose; the June final readings are scored once. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 26, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for the Nose Creek sanitary trunk · Yes First reading and the capital-budget direction explain the purpose of Bylaw 8B2026. | City report EC2026-0402, Nose Creek Sanitary Trunk Extension · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 4, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Vote explanation | Opposed another external budget review because he considered it duplicative of recent reviews and ongoing internal work. | Schmidt: vote explanations, May 4, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Fund a three-business-unit zero-based review pilot · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Council adopted | Council funded a three-business-unit pilot; a completed citywide review is not established. | Milestone source |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize ENMAX capital borrowing and lending · Yes This is an explicit final authorization for a defined capital program, including associated lending to ENMAX. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| February 2026 | Kim Tyers | Stated position | Supported stopping the property-tax increase and reducing spending she considered outside core municipal responsibilities. | Tyers: February 2026 newsletter · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The same final-reading tabulation is not another scored authority. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes The first-reading report identifies the maximum and purpose of Bylaw 8B2025; only final approval is scored. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize $52.5 million for vehicles and equipment · Yes First reading identifies the $52.5 million maximum and capital purpose. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 8, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Vote explanation | Opposed the zero-increase instruction because unspecified reductions could produce arbitrary cuts and job losses without evidence. | Yule budget explanation, December 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Direct a phased shift of tax share toward residential property · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Scope a zero-based budget review program · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Voted for | Voted for scoping a zero-based review program. | Milestone source |
| December 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Vote explanation | Opposed the final budget after tax-freeze proposals failed, arguing essential services could be protected while achieving no increase. | Jamieson budget rationale, pages 1 and 5 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Stated position | Advocated rebuilding major departmental budgets from their underlying costs, with clearer financial reporting and longer public review periods. | Farkas: financial responsibility policy brief, September 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Campaign commitment | Restore budget reviews that require key departments to justify their underlying spending. | Farkas: financial responsibility policy brief, September 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Andre Chabot | Stated position | Proposed spending growth of inflation plus half of population growth, accounting for new development's additional revenue. | Question 5 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| 2025 | Landon Johnston | Stated position | Favoured spending growth below inflation plus population growth, with property-tax increases around inflation. | Question 5 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| 2024 | Dan McLean | Vote explanation | Opposed the 2024 budget's tax increase, arguing higher property taxes worsen housing costs for owners and renters. | McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| December 2023 | Jennifer Wyness | Vote explanation | Explained opposing the residential tax shift because she believed households could not absorb more of businesses' tax burden. | Wyness: December 2023 newsletter · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Undated source | John Pantazopoulos | Vote explanation | Supported redirecting $50 million of investment income toward operations to lower the proposed tax increase while maintaining services. | Pantazopoulos budget newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
Favoured concentrating the next four-year budget on infrastructure, safety and essential services rather than raising taxes for programs he considers non-core.
Ward September 2026 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an explicit budget-allocation priority, separate from the planning position; month precision follows the newsletter heading.
Opposed another external budget review because he considered it duplicative of recent reviews and ongoing internal work.
Schmidt: vote explanations, May 4, 2026 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Corrects the link to the later funded pilot that this source discusses; the earlier unanimous scoping direction was a different choice.
Supported stopping the property-tax increase and reducing spending she considered outside core municipal responsibilities.
Tyers: February 2026 newsletter · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Records an explicit budget priority rather than inferring a general tax position from capital-borrowing votes.
Opposed the zero-increase instruction because unspecified reductions could produce arbitrary cuts and job losses without evidence.
Yule budget explanation, December 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds fiscal coverage for an uncovered current member through an explicit explanation, without assuming that opposing a tax freeze means opposing efficiency.
Opposed the final budget after tax-freeze proposals failed, arguing essential services could be protected while achieving no increase.
Jamieson budget rationale, pages 1 and 5 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an explicit issue-specific voting explanation for an uncovered current member; the report is signed December 2025, so only month precision is assigned.
Advocated rebuilding major departmental budgets from their underlying costs, with clearer financial reporting and longer public review periods.
Farkas: financial responsibility policy brief, September 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Provides the campaign rationale for budget review, separate from Council’s later scope and pilot decisions.
Proposed spending growth of inflation plus half of population growth, accounting for new development's additional revenue.
Question 5 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an independent issue and concrete policy choice for a current member with no existing statements.
Favoured spending growth below inflation plus population growth, with property-tax increases around inflation.
Question 5 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an independent issue and concrete policy choice for a current member with no existing statements.
Opposed the 2024 budget's tax increase, arguing higher property taxes worsen housing costs for owners and renters.
McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds first issue coverage for an uncovered current member from his signed 2024 newsletter; layout timestamps are not treated as publication dates.
Explained opposing the residential tax shift because she believed households could not absorb more of businesses' tax burden.
Wyness: December 2023 newsletter · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Explains the distribution of tax burden between households and business, distinct from total spending or borrowing.
Supported redirecting $50 million of investment income toward operations to lower the proposed tax increase while maintaining services.
Pantazopoulos budget newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Broadens a zoning-only profile using an authored budget explanation; no publication date is assigned from the date of the Council vote.
Restore budget reviews that require key departments to justify their underlying spending.
Farkas: financial responsibility policy brief, September 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Voted for scoping a zero-based review program.
Milestone sourceCouncil funded a three-business-unit pilot; a completed citywide review is not established.
Milestone source