Recorded votes on CPC2016-216
Bylaw reading at the Combined Meeting of Council, September 12, 2016. Carried 11–3.
Result
Carried 11–3
Margin +8
Absent
0
Meeting
Sep 12, 2016
Combined Meeting of Council
Topic
Planning & land use
Assigned by keyword
Kind
Bylaw reading
Resolution
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2016-216 be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. ADOPT the proposed redesignation of 0.05 hectares ± (0.14 acres ±) located at 4132 Maryvale Road NE (Plan 7620JK, Block 5, Lot 24) from Residential – Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential – Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District, in accordance with Administration’s recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 217D2016.
Seats
YesNoAbsent (recorded)No vote recorded
Seats run Mayor, then Wards 1–14. Text and named votes from the confirmed Council minutes (linked above, at the source page).
How each member voted
| Seat | Member | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mayor | Naheed Nenshi | Yes |
| Ward 1 | Ward Sutherland | Yes |
| Ward 2 | Joe Magliocca | Yes |
| Ward 3 | Jim Stevenson | No |
| Ward 4 | Sean Chu | No |
| Ward 5 | Ray Jones | Yes |
| Ward 6 | Richard Pootmans | Yes |
| Ward 7 | Druh Farrell | Yes |
| Ward 8 | Evan Woolley | Yes |
| Ward 9 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Yes |
| Ward 10 | Andre Chabot | No |
| Ward 12 | Shane Keating | Yes |
| Ward 13 | Diane Colley-Urquhart | Yes |
| Ward 14 | Peter Demong | Yes |
A roll call from the minutes. A member not listed was absent or did not vote; the minutes do not always say which.
Recorded votes on CPC2016-216
| Meeting | Motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
Sep 12, 2016 Combined Meeting of Council | Main motion That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2016-216 be filed, the application refused and Bylaw 217D2016 be abandoned. | Defeated 4–10 |
Sep 12, 2016 (this vote) Combined Meeting of Council | Bylaw reading That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2016-216 be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. ADOPT the proposed redesignation of 0.05 hectares ± (0.14 acres ±) loca… | Carried 11–3 |
Amendments, referrals and the main motion on the same report, oldest first.