Skip to content
PolitiWardCalgary
‹ All Council votes

Recorded votes on PUD2014-0312

Amendment at the Regular Meeting of Council, May 26, 2014. Defeated 5–9.

Result
Defeated 5–9
Margin -4
Absent
0
Meeting
May 26, 2014
Regular Meeting of Council
Topic
Planning & land use
Keyword-derived
Kind
Amendment

Resolution

Council minutes, roll call. Source

That the SPC on Planning and Urban Development Recommendations contained in Report PUD2014-0312 be amended by adding new Recommendations 3, 4 and 5, after amendment, as follows: “3. Direct Administration to bring forward through the SPC on Planning and Urban Development and then to Council a framework for communities to receive the benefits of increased density through land use amendments as they occur along Urban and Neighbourhood Corridors: a) Create a list of potential bonus items for community consideration that lists items that support community character, heritage, affordable housing, and general community improvements. b) Create and institutionalize a process for individual communities to identify community priorities as they relate to community character, heritage amenities, affordable housing and local improvements. c) Develop a process for Administration and developers to negotiate the value of developer contributions, including creating evaluation criteria and standard valuation techniques, as developers apply for land use amendments that increase density. 4. To ensure that heritage and affordable housing priorities can be met through the allocation of community benefits, direct Administration to: a) Research and implement tools to protect and mitigate the loss of heritage amenities in communities. b) Ensure that identified corridors in the Corridor Program can support intensification beyond the existing land-uses without damaging the valued character of a corridor; if further intensification would damage the valued community character or amenities of a corridor and could not be mitigated with bonusing and other tools, then inclusion of the corridor in the Program should be reconsidered. c) Ensure alignment between the Corridor Program and the Affordable Housing Strategy. d) Research and implement tools to protect and encourage more affordable housing in communities, to offset potential gentrification effects. 5. Direct Administration to bring forward to the SPC on Planning and Urban Development no later than 2014 September, an interim report to support Recommendations 1 and 2.”.

Seats
YesNoAbsent (recorded)No vote recorded
Seats run Mayor, then Wards 1–14. Text and named votes from the confirmed Council minutes (linked above, at the source page).

How each member voted

SeatMemberVote
MayorNaheed NenshiYes
Ward 1Ward SutherlandNo
Ward 2Joe MaglioccaNo
Ward 3Jim StevensonNo
Ward 4Sean ChuNo
Ward 5Ray JonesNo
Ward 6Richard PootmansNo
Ward 7Druh FarrellYes
Ward 8Evan WoolleyYes
Ward 9Gian-Carlo CarraYes
Ward 10Andre ChabotNo
Ward 11Brian PincottYes
Ward 12Shane KeatingNo
Ward 14Peter DemongNo
A roll call from the minutes. A member not listed was absent or did not vote; the minutes do not always say which.

Recorded votes on PUD2014-0312

2 votes
MeetingMotionResult
May 26, 2014 (this vote)
Regular Meeting of Council
Amendment
That the SPC on Planning and Urban Development Recommendations contained in Report PUD2014-0312 be amended by adding new Recommendations 3, 4 and 5, after amendment, as follows: “3. Direct Administ…
Defeated 5–9
May 26, 2014
Regular Meeting of Council
Main motion
That the SPC on Planning and Urban Development Recommendations contained in Report PUD2014-0312 be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Approve an overspend of the Local Area Planning and Implemen…
Carried 8–6
Amendments, referrals and the main motion on the same report, oldest first.