Brian Pincott
Former councillor. Ran for councillor in 2010 and 2013.
Elections contested
2
Won
2
Votes received
21,909
all races combined
Council terms
2
2010–2013, 2013–2017
Council votes recorded
2,419
since 2010 (roll calls before 2021)
Record
View chart data
Chart values
4 rows| Office | Record |
|---|---|
| Ward 11 councillor | Councillor, Ward 11, 2010–2013 |
| Ward 11 councillor | Councillor, Ward 11, 2013–2017 |
| Ward 11 councillor | 2010 Ward 11 councillor: 36.4%, won |
| Ward 11 councillor | 2013 Ward 11 councillor: 47.7%, won |
Bars are terms on council; diamonds are elections (filled = won). Records start with the 2010 election.
Elections
| Year | Race | Votes | Share | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Ward 11 councillor | 11,075 | 47.7% | ElectedIncumbent |
| 2010 | Ward 11 councillor | 10,834 | 36.4% | ElectedIncumbent |
Official results, City of Calgary Open Data (sources). Share is of all votes cast in the race; affiliations appear from 2025, the first election with municipal parties.
Name as recorded
| Source | Spelling |
|---|---|
| Ballot | Pincott, Brian |
Spellings matched to this person across sources. See About for how names are resolved.
Issue positions
Explore the issues and policy measures or compare this person.
Advancing the Green Line rail program
Explicit approvals to advance the Green Line program. Choices between two rail alignments and a wind-down after another government's funding withdrawal are explained separately and do not automatically count as opposition to rail.
Opposed the reviewed advancement proposalsSupported the reviewed advancement proposals
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Pincott | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Broader residential permissions
Reviewed land-use decisions where the direction of residential building permissions is explicit. Broader permission does not establish that a home was built. Contextual amendments do not each become another independent score.
Favoured narrower permissionsFavoured broader permissions
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Pincott | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Capital borrowing authorizations
Final readings of specified capital borrowing bylaws. This is a record of support for these particular debt-financed projects, not a general tax, spending or fiscal-conservatism score; utility-supported and tax-supported debt may differ.
Opposed the reviewed borrowing authoritiesSupported the reviewed borrowing authorities
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Pincott | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Climate and Environment operating allocations
Explicit amendments to Climate and Environment operating allocations. This is separate from formal targets and declarations; multiple amendments within one annual budget share one scoring weight.
Favoured the reviewed funding reductionsFavoured retaining the reviewed allocations
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Pincott | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Community-based safety responses
Explicit funding or plan approvals for community-based prevention and wellbeing responses. This measure makes no claim about a member's position on every police budget or the effectiveness of an adopted plan.
Opposed the reviewed community-safety proposalsSupported the reviewed community-safety proposals
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Pincott | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Formal municipal climate commitments
Reviewed decisions establishing or rescinding municipal climate targets, strategies and declarations. A declaration vote is not evidence of a particular dollar amount or emissions outcome.
Favoured fewer formal commitmentsFavoured more formal commitments
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Pincott | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Public funding for the Event Centre
Specific public financial commitments to the Event Centre project, including the original project and the replacement agreement. These are different proposals across time; a vote is not a generic position on all major projects.
Opposed the reviewed public commitmentsSupported the reviewed public commitments
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Pincott | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Public support for non-market housing
Reviewed decisions that provide a specific financial or tax benefit for non-market housing. A vote records a choice on that proposal, not an estimate of affordability outcomes or an overall housing ideology.
Opposed the reviewed support proposalsSupported the reviewed support proposals
View chart data
Policy positions
1 row| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Pincott | Not available | 0 | Not available | Not available | Insufficient voting evidence | Not available | Not available |
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.
Policy choices over time
No policy history collected for this selection
Missing votes and statements remain unknown.
Votes, statements, promises and action milestones retain distinct labels. Dates preserve source precision; undated records appear last. Different proposals can explain different choices; a changed vote is not automatically a changed belief.
Statements and reasons for votes
No sourced statements collected
This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.
Published statements are attributed to their author and kept separate from recorded votes.
Promises and actions
No sourced commitments collected
A missing commitment is not a finding that someone made no promises.
Milestones describe the evidence collected. Adoption, an individual vote and implementation are different events; a missing milestone is not proof that a promise was broken.
Policy leadership
No documented leadership entries collected
Sponsorship and committee appointments require an explicit source; a Yes vote alone does not establish either.
Appointment records do not establish continued service beyond their sourced term. Authorship and sponsorship require explicit documentation.
Voting record
| Council | Votes cast | On split votes | Participation | Against the result* | Same vote as mayor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013–2017 council (roll calls) | 1,324 | 1,317 | 88.0% | 31.9% | 82.6% |
| 2010–2013 council (roll calls) | 771 | 767 | 97.6% | 28.6% | 58.1% |
Vote counts and agreement here use Council meetings, with procedural motions excluded. A missing vote counts as not participating because absences are rarely recorded. *On split (non-unanimous) motions. Rows marked roll calls (and 2017–21 votes before 2021): Before 2021 a member's vote is on record only when Council took a roll call, which the minutes print; those are the votes a member asked to record, mostly contested ones. Committee votes before October 2020 are not included.
Votes the same way as…
View chart data
Chart values
14 rows| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Druh Farrell | 88% |
| Naheed Nenshi | 83% |
| Evan Woolley | 80% |
| Gian-Carlo Carra | 79% |
| Richard Pootmans | 63% |
| Diane Colley-Urquhart | 62% |
| Shane Keating | 57% |
| Ray Jones | 48% |
| Ward Sutherland | 45% |
| Peter Demong | 41% |
| Andre Chabot | 36% |
| Joe Magliocca | 32% |
| Jim Stevenson | 24% |
| Sean Chu | 23% |
Share of Council-meeting motions both members voted on where they cast the same vote (procedural motions excluded).
Votes by topic
NoYes
View chart data
Chart values
13 rows| Topic | No | Yes |
|---|---|---|
| Planning & land use | 349 | 941 |
| Budget, taxes & finance | 154 | 126 |
| Transit & transportation | 68 | 118 |
| Governance & council | 40 | 66 |
| Other | 40 | 52 |
| Social & community services | 21 | 30 |
| Housing & affordability | 10 | 23 |
| Economy & business | 11 | 14 |
| Environment, water & climate | 10 | 8 |
| Arts, culture, sport & events | 6 | 1 |
| Public safety & policing | 3 | 1 |
| Public health | 1 | 1 |
| Intergovernmental | 1 | 0 |
Council and committee votes; procedural motions excluded. Topics come from keyword rules applied to the motion text.
Vote record
Sep 11, 2017
C2017-0655
Council direct Administration to engage in discussions with the applicant on publicly accessible green space in this development.
Voted NoDefeated7–7
Sep 11, 2017
C2017-0655
That Council refer Report C2017-0655 and second and third readings of Bylaw 16302017 to the Administration for further consultation on other potential uses, to return to the 2017 December 11 Combined Meeting of Council.
Voted NoDefeated4–10
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-309
That the Administration Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-309, be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt, by bylaw, the proposed amendments to the East Springbank Area Structure Plan Appendix 5: East Springbank Ill Community Plan, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 57P2017. 3. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 1.30 hectares± (3.21 acres±) located at 35 Coulee Way SW (Portion of Plan 6262AC, Block 3) from Residential - One Dwelling (R-1 District and Special Purpose - School, Park and Community Reserve (S-SPR) District to Multi-Residential - At Grade (M-Gd53) District and Special Purpose - School, Park and Community Reserve (S-SPR) District; and 4. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 30702017.
Voted NoDefeated6–9
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0022
That Bylaw 29002017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1 P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0022), be introduced and read a first time.
Voted YesCarried11–4
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-292
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-292, be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 0.08 hectares± (0.19 acre±) located at 202 and 206 - 15 Avenue NE (Plan 791 P, Block 26, Lots 16 to 18) from Multi-Residential - Medium Profile Support Commercial (M-X2) District to Multi-Residential - High Density Low Rise (M-H1 h22) District, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 29002017.
Voted YesCarried11–4
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0142
That Bylaw 28802017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1 P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0142), be read a third time.
Voted YesCarried12–3
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0142
That Bylaw 28802017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1 P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0142), be introduced and read a first time.
Voted YesCarried12–3
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-290
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-290, be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt the proposed amendments to the North Hill Area Redevelopment Plan, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 52P2017. 3. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 0.05 hectares ± (0.12 acres±) located at 4 70 - 19 Avenue NW (Plan 21290, Block 16, Lots 31 and 32) from Residential - Contextual One I Two Dwelling (R-C2) District to Residential - Grade-Oriented Infill (R-CG) District, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 4. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 28802017.
Voted YesCarried12–3
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-289
That Council refer Report CPC2017-289 to the Administration to allow for broader community engagement on both height and interface and return to the 2017 December 11 Combined Meeting of Council.
Voted YesDefeated5–9
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-291
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-291 , be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 0.07 hectares± (0.17 acres±) located at 647 - 4 Avenue NE (Plan 3247GL, Lots 2 and 3) from Multi-Residential - Contextual GradeOriented (M-CG d111) District to Multi-Residential - Contextual Medium Profile (M-C2) District, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 28902017.
Voted YesCarried12–2
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0144
That Bylaw 28402017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1 P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0144), be read a third time.
Voted YesCarried8–7
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0144
That Bylaw 28402017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1 P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0144), be introduced and read a first time.
Voted YesCarried8–7
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-286
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-286, be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 0.05 hectares ± (0.13 acres ±) located at 804 Sierra Morena Place SW (Plan 9011261, Block 1, Lot 27) from Residential - Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential - Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 28402017.
Voted YesCarried8–7
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-286
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-286, be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 0.05 hectares± (0.13 acres±) located at 804 Sierra Morena Place SW (Plan 9011261, Block 1, Lot 27) from Residential - Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential - Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 28402017.
Voted YesDefeated7–7
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0151
That Bylaw 28302017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1 P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0151), be read a third time.
Voted YesCarried11–4
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0151
That Bylaw 28302017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0151), be introduced and read a first time.
Voted YesCarried11–4
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-285
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-285, be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 0.04 hectares± (0.09 acres±) located at 182 Cougar Ridge Close SW (Plan 1210568, Block 6, Lot 3) from Residential - One Dwelling (R-1) District to Residential One Dwelling (R-1 s) District, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 28302017.
Voted YesCarried11–4
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0143
That Bylaw 28002017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0143), be read a third time.
Voted YesCarried8–7
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0143
That Bylaw 28002017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0143), be introduced and read a first time.
Voted YesCarried8–7
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-282
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-282, be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 0.06 hectares± (0.14 acres±) located at 91 Silverado Ridge Crescent SW (Plan 0715756, Block 49, Lot 32) from Residential - One Dwelling (R-1) District to Residential - One Dwelling (R-1s) District, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 28002017.
Voted YesCarried8–7
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0135
That Bylaw 27702017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1 P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0135), be introduced and read a first time.
Voted YesCarried9–5
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-279
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-279, be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 0.08 hectares ± (0.19 acres±) located at 3014 - 14 Street SW (Plan 8632FT, Block 83, Lot 6) from Residential - Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential - Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1 s) District, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 27702017.
Voted YesCarried9–5
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0096
That Bylaw 27602017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1 P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0096), be read a third time.
Voted YesCarried12–3
Sep 11, 2017
LOC2017-0096
That Bylaw 27602017, Being a Bylaw of The City of Calgary to Amend the Land Use Bylaw 1 P2007 (Land Use Amendment LOC2017-0096), be introduced and read a first time.
Voted YesCarried12–3
Sep 11, 2017
CPC2017-278
That the Calgary Planning Commission Recommendations contained in Report CPC2017-278, be adopted, as follows: That Council: 1. Adopt the proposed redesignation of 0.09 hectares± (0.22 acres±) located at 5823 Dalford Road NW (Plan 6590JK, Block 18 Lot 16) from Residential - Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential -Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1 s) District, in accordance with Administration's recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 27602017.
Voted YesCarried12–3
Showing 30 of 2,084, newest first.