Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW
Zoning & housing permissions · May 12, 2026
What changed
A Killarney/Glengarry application sought H-GO zoning in place of a Direct Control district.
City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Why this decision is included
Included by the January–June 2026 H-GO application frame. The staff report establishes increased density for this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal; the refusal is retained.
How votes are grouped: This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight.
What Yes meant
Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels.
What No meant
Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district.
Alternatives and outcome
Retain the parcel-specific Direct Control rules or adopt the proposed H-GO district.
Council defeated the application 6–9.
not_adoptedConfirmed 2026 Council minutes, May 12, page 298: final decision
A recorded vote or adoption does not establish that a project or service was delivered.
Recorded choices
| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 12, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Dan McLean | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Rob Ward | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.
Published explanations
No sourced statements collected
This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.
Documented policy leadership
No documented leadership entries collected
Sponsorship and committee appointments require an explicit source; a Yes vote alone does not establish either.