Which kinds of homes the land-use rules allow, where they can be built and how applications are approved. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.
Reviewed land-use decisions where the direction of residential building permissions is explicit. Broader permission does not establish that a home was built. Contextual amendments do not each become another independent score.
Policy positions
15 rows| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myke Atkinson | 77.7777777778 | 9 | 75 | 87.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Andre Chabot | 44.4444444444 | 9 | 37.5 | 50 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Harrison Clark | 55.5555555556 | 9 | 50 | 62.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Raj Dhaliwal | 66.6666666667 | 9 | 62.5 | 75 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Jeromy Farkas | 62.5 | 8 | 57.1428571429 | 71.4285714286 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Mike Jamieson | 55.5555555556 | 9 | 50 | 62.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Landon Johnston | 55.5555555556 | 9 | 50 | 62.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| DJ Kelly | 66.6666666667 | 9 | 62.5 | 75 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Dan McLean | 55.5555555556 | 9 | 50 | 62.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| John Pantazopoulos | 55.5555555556 | 9 | 50 | 62.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Nathaniel Schmidt | 87.5 | 8 | 85.7142857143 | 100 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Kim Tyers | 77.7777777778 | 9 | 75 | 87.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Rob Ward | 55.5555555556 | 9 | 50 | 62.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Jennifer Wyness | 55.5555555556 | 9 | 50 | 62.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
| Andrew Yule | 77.7777777778 | 9 | 75 | 87.5 | Mixed choices | Jan 20, 2026 | Jun 23, 2026 |
Bylaw 69D2026 changed 4524 Grove Hill Road SW from H-GO to R-CG, narrowing the higher-intensity option at this parcel.
Outcome: Final reading carried 14–1, with Tyers opposed. This changes land-use permissions; it does not establish what was built.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Bylaw 70D2026 changed 1323 – 10 Avenue SE from R-CG to H-GO.
Outcome: Final reading carried with all 14 named voters in favour. Farkas has no named vote in this roll call. Zoning approval does not establish construction.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026A Killarney/Glengarry application sought H-GO zoning in place of a Direct Control district.
Outcome: Council defeated the application 6–9.
City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Bylaw 9P2026 restored earlier low-density districts on affected parcels with exemptions and reversed several 2024 residential rules.
Outcome: Final reading carried 12–3. The City reports that the repeal's zoning changes took effect August 4, 2026.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Bylaw 27D2026 replaced the parcel’s Direct Control designation with H-GO in Killarney/Glengarry. City report CPC2026-0069 describes a density increase and wider housing choice.
Outcome: Final reading carried with all 15 members in favour. A development application was under review; this vote does not establish construction.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Bylaw 17D2026 replaced R-CG with H-GO at 2001 and 2007 – 37 Street SE.
Outcome: Final reading carried with all 14 named voters in favour. Schmidt has no named vote in this roll call. Zoning approval does not establish development completion.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026The Tuxedo Park application proposed replacing R-CG with H-GO. The policy approval and final bylaw reading have different named voting splits.
Outcome: The policy recommendation passed 10–4; the final third reading passed 13–1. Jamieson, Tyers and Kelly voted No on the recommendation and Yes on final reading. Dhaliwal has no named vote in either roll call.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026The Glendale application proposed changing a residential parcel from R-CG to H-GO, a district permitting a higher intensity of ground-oriented housing.
Outcome: The final reading carried 15–0. This changed land-use permission and did not establish construction completion.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026The Montgomery application proposed changing a residential parcel from R-CG to H-GO.
Outcome: Council passed final reading 14–1; the record does not establish that a development was built.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026The West Hillhurst application proposed replacing R-CG with H-GO on two lots.
Outcome: The application was defeated 2–13.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Council directed work on exempting fee-simple townhouse and rowhouse developments in newly developing communities from development-permit requirements.
Outcome: Council directed preparation of amendments and an update. This direction alone did not enact the exemption.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026The adopted land-use changes expanded the base residential districts to allow a wider variety of ground-oriented homes.
Outcome: Council adopted the bylaw; its rules took effect August 6, 2024. The City later repealed the citywide changes in 2026.
City of Calgary, 2024 rezoning decision summary · reviewed Oct 29, 2026| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 23, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Dan McLean | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | No | Reject this narrowing of the parcel’s designation. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Rob Ward | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale | Yes | Give final reading to the replacement of H-GO with R-CG. The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Dan McLean | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jun 23, 2026 | Rob Ward | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood | Yes | Give final reading to higher-intensity grade-oriented residential permissions. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Dan McLean | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO district for these parcels. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
May 12, 2026 | Rob Ward | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW | No | Reject this proposed replacement of the existing Direct Control district. The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Dan McLean | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Apr 8, 2026 | Rob Ward | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Dan McLean | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Mar 17, 2026 | Rob Ward | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW | Yes | Give final reading to the H-GO designation. CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Dan McLean | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Rob Ward | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn | Yes | Give final reading to the designation allowing higher-intensity grade-oriented redevelopment. The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Reviewed policy choice |
Feb 17, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | No | Oppose the proposal at that stage; the record does not establish the reason for a changed vote at another stage. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | No | Oppose the proposal at that stage; the record does not establish the reason for a changed vote at another stage. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Dan McLean | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Dan McLean | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | No | Oppose the proposal at that stage; the record does not establish the reason for a changed vote at another stage. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | No | Oppose the proposal at that stage; the record does not establish the reason for a changed vote at another stage. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | No | Oppose the proposal at that stage; the record does not establish the reason for a changed vote at another stage. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Rob Ward | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Context / unscored |
Feb 17, 2026 | Rob Ward | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE | Yes | Approve the proposal at the named stage. The policy approval and final reading are shown separately. Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Context / unscored |
Jan 20, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Dan McLean | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Rob Ward | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW | Yes | Give the H-GO redesignation final reading. The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | No | Reject final reading of this parcel-specific change. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Dan McLean | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Rob Ward | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW | Yes | Give this higher-intensity ground-oriented housing district final reading. The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Dan McLean | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO redesignation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO redesignation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Rob Ward | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | No | Reject final adoption of this repeal bylaw. Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules | Yes | Pass the amended repeal bylaw at third reading. December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Sean Chu | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | No | Decline this direction at this vote. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jun 18, 2024 | Terry Wong | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption | Yes | Direct preparation of the exemption amendments and associated housing approval-process work. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
| Date / precision | Person | Record type | Choice or statement | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Implementation documented | The City records the repeal's zoning changes as in effect from this date. This documents the repeal component as a collective Council outcome; it does not establish fulfillment of the broader public-engagement commitment. | Milestone source |
| Aug 4, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Implementation documented | The City's implementation timeline records the repeal's zoning changes as in effect. This establishes the repeal component as a collective Council outcome; completion of the promised replacement approach is not established. | Milestone source |
| July 2026 | Rob Ward | Stated position | Preferred targeted updates to the existing Municipal Development Plan over completing the Calgary Plan, concerned about transit-area intensification and transparency. | Ward July 2026 newsletter, page 1 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · No The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Replace H-GO with R-CG in Glendale · Yes The minutes explicitly change H-GO to R-CG. The City identifies H-GO as the higher-intensity redevelopment option (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html), so Yes has direction −1. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 381 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Inglewood · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO, which the City describes as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored; a missing individual vote is unknown. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-06-23, PDF page 395 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · No The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · Yes The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · No The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · Yes The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · No The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · No The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · No The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · No The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · Yes The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · No The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · No The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · Yes The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · Yes The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · Yes The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 12, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 3036–3040 29 Street SW · No The City's planning report explicitly identifies a residential density increase and more housing choices compared with the existing Direct Control district. Only this site-specific application is scored. | City planning report CPC2026-0252, March 26, and confirmed May 12 decision · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes The final bylaw narrows the broader residential permissions adopted in 2024. Only this final choice is scored in the repeal family. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Apr 8, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Council adopted | Voted for the adopted repeal bylaw; the broader engagement commitment remains unverified. | Milestone source |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Council adopted | Voted for the adopted repeal bylaw; completion of the replacement strategy is not established. | Milestone source |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 2803 – 32 Street SW · Yes CPC2026-0069 identifies this specific DC-to-H-GO proposal as increasing residential density and housing choice. Only final reading is scored; the recommendation’s confidential-submission direction is not a separate policy score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-03-17, PDF page 144 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning in Forest Lawn · Yes The minutes specify R-CG to H-GO. The City describes H-GO as allowing higher-intensity redevelopment than R-CG (https://www.calgary.ca/planning/projects/rezoning/background-info.html). Only final reading is scored. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 80 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · No Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · No Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · No Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · No Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · No Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Unscored: three members changed their recorded choice between policy approval and final reading. Both stages are preserved; the score does not choose one as a general stance. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Adopt H-GO zoning at 253 – 19 Avenue NE · Yes Final reading passed 13–1 after a 10–4 policy recommendation. Preserved to show the changed individual choices; it adds no score. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, 2026-02-17, PDF page 65 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| February 2026 | Kim Tyers | Stated position | Before the public hearing, advocated full repeal over consultation, infrastructure and neighbourhood-character concerns, followed by neighbourhood-specific density discussions. | Tyers: February 2026 newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4939 17 Avenue SW · Yes The confirmed minutes identify the parcel's R-CG-to-H-GO change. Score the final reading once for this independent application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 10–11 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · No The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Allow H-GO housing at 4816 Bowness Road NW · Yes The recorded redesignation broadens the ground-oriented residential permissions for this parcel. Separate readings count as one application. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, pages 11–12 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · Yes A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · Yes A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW · No A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · No Proposed additional R-CG restrictions form part of the same repeal debate and are not additional independent scores. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Repeal the citywide residential rezoning rules · Yes December 2025 direction to prepare a repeal, before the public hearing and final adoption. | Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, April 8 continuation, page 195 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Voted for | Voted for preparing repeal; this establishes a legislative step. | Milestone source |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Voted for | Voted to prepare repeal legislation and a public hearing. | Milestone source |
| November 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Stated position | Advocated repeal and stronger neighbourhood engagement during the initial repeal process, before the final 2026 public hearing and vote. | Pantazopoulos: November 2025 newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| November 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Campaign commitment | Repeal citywide rezoning and seek stronger public engagement in development decisions. | Pantazopoulos: November 2025 newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Stated position | Proposed replacing citywide rezoning with a neighbourhood-informed approach, concentrating new housing near transit, education and employment. | Farkas: housing policy brief, June 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Campaign commitment | Repeal citywide rezoning and replace it with a targeted approach informed by communities. | Farkas: housing policy brief, June 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| 2025 | Andre Chabot | Stated position | Favoured repeal after a public hearing and locally planned density with stronger engagement. | Question 14 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Prepare a townhouse development-permit exemption · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 22, 2024 | Terry Wong | Vote explanation | Explained opposing citywide rezoning because he considered engagement flawed and preferred prioritizing transitional and below-market housing needs. | Wong: rezoning vote explanation, May 22, 2024 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| May 17, 2024 | Jennifer Wyness | Vote explanation | Supported the rezoning package with amendments for suite density calculations and age-based parking requirements, arguing suburban transit service required different treatment. | Wyness signed rationale, May 17, 2024 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | Terry Wong | Stated position | Said he was withholding his voting intention before the hearing while seeking better engagement and questioning whether rezoning alone improved affordability. | Wong: pre-hearing statement, April 18, 2024 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2024 | Dan McLean | Vote explanation | Opposed citywide rezoning over neighbourhood input, density and character, citing concerns raised during the public hearing. | McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Undated source | Myke Atkinson | Stated position | Proposed reducing barriers to mixed-use buildings so existing neighbourhoods can accommodate housing alongside everyday services. | Atkinson: campaign priorities (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Undated source | DJ Kelly | Stated position | Supported denser housing around transit and jobs, predictable permit deadlines and planning infrastructure around housing growth. | Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
Preferred targeted updates to the existing Municipal Development Plan over completing the Calgary Plan, concerned about transit-area intensification and transparency.
Ward July 2026 newsletter, page 1 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds first zoning coverage through his own planning alternative; preserves newsletter month and distinguishes a policy plan from parcel rezoning.
Before the public hearing, advocated full repeal over consultation, infrastructure and neighbourhood-character concerns, followed by neighbourhood-specific density discussions.
Tyers: February 2026 newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Retains a pre-hearing position; February 2026 advocacy cannot explain a final vote that occurred in April.
Advocated repeal and stronger neighbourhood engagement during the initial repeal process, before the final 2026 public hearing and vote.
Pantazopoulos: November 2025 newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Retains an early published position without presenting November 2025 advocacy as an explanation of the April 2026 final vote.
Proposed replacing citywide rezoning with a neighbourhood-informed approach, concentrating new housing near transit, education and employment.
Farkas: housing policy brief, June 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Records the proposed replacement approach before the repeal vote, allowing readers to distinguish a campaign position from the later adopted policy.
Favoured repeal after a public hearing and locally planned density with stronger engagement.
Question 14 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an independent issue and concrete policy choice for a current member with no existing statements.
Explained opposing citywide rezoning because he considered engagement flawed and preferred prioritizing transitional and below-market housing needs.
Wong: rezoning vote explanation, May 22, 2024 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Adds the member’s own reason after the vote, distinct from the earlier undecided statement and from inferred motives.
Supported the rezoning package with amendments for suite density calculations and age-based parking requirements, arguing suburban transit service required different treatment.
Wyness signed rationale, May 17, 2024 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Broadens a taxes-only profile with her qualified support for rezoning; the signed date is preserved rather than the earlier vote date.
Said he was withholding his voting intention before the hearing while seeking better engagement and questioning whether rezoning alone improved affordability.
Wong: pre-hearing statement, April 18, 2024 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Preserves a pre-hearing statement withholding a vote intention, so uncertainty is not rewritten as a settled stance.
Opposed citywide rezoning over neighbourhood input, density and character, citing concerns raised during the public hearing.
McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds first issue coverage for an uncovered current member from his signed 2024 newsletter; layout timestamps are not treated as publication dates.
Proposed reducing barriers to mixed-use buildings so existing neighbourhoods can accommodate housing alongside everyday services.
Atkinson: campaign priorities (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Records the desired relationship between neighbourhood services and housing, without inferring a recorded vote on a particular parcel.
Supported denser housing around transit and jobs, predictable permit deadlines and planning infrastructure around housing growth.
Kelly: campaign platform (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Adds the stated location and infrastructure conditions on support for density, rather than assigning an unconditional housing label.
Repeal citywide rezoning and seek stronger public engagement in development decisions.
Pantazopoulos: November 2025 newsletter · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Voted for preparing repeal; this establishes a legislative step.
Milestone sourceVoted for the adopted repeal bylaw; the broader engagement commitment remains unverified.
Milestone sourceThe City records the repeal's zoning changes as in effect from this date. This documents the repeal component as a collective Council outcome; it does not establish fulfillment of the broader public-engagement commitment.
Milestone sourceRepeal citywide rezoning and replace it with a targeted approach informed by communities.
Farkas: housing policy brief, June 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Voted to prepare repeal legislation and a public hearing.
Milestone sourceVoted for the adopted repeal bylaw; completion of the replacement strategy is not established.
Milestone sourceThe City's implementation timeline records the repeal's zoning changes as in effect. This establishes the repeal component as a collective Council outcome; completion of the promised replacement approach is not established.
Milestone source