Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW
Zoning & housing permissions · Jan 20, 2026
What changed
The West Hillhurst application proposed replacing R-CG with H-GO on two lots.
Confirmed 2026 Council minutes, January 20, page 13 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Why this decision is included
Included by the January–June 2026 H-GO application frame. The refused proposal is retained, using the actual rejection rather than inventing a final reading.
How votes are grouped: This proposal is one decision family. Its readings, amendments and contextual votes cannot create additional independent evidence; an unscored proposal contributes no weight.
What Yes meant
Approve the proposed H-GO redesignation.
What No meant
Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation.
Alternatives and outcome
Keep the current designation or allow the proposed higher-intensity ground-oriented district.
The application was defeated 2–13.
not_adoptedA recorded vote or adoption does not establish that a project or service was delivered.
Recorded choices
| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 20, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Dan McLean | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO redesignation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | Yes | Approve the proposed H-GO redesignation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 20, 2026 | Rob Ward | Consider H-GO at 2330–2332 5 Avenue NW | No | Reject this particular H-GO application, retaining the existing designation. A Yes approved an explicitly broader residential district; a No rejected this site-specific proposal. No motive is inferred. | Reviewed policy choice |
Only reviewed policy choices are scored. Each independent decision family counts once per measure; choices within one budget or policy package share that family’s weight. statements, promises, absences and contextual amendments do not contribute. Two decisions are the minimum for a position. The sensitivity range shows the score after removing one decision at a time; it is not a statistical confidence interval or a prediction.
Published explanations
No sourced statements collected
This is a gap in the collected evidence; it does not establish a person’s views.
Documented policy leadership
No documented leadership entries collected
Sponsorship and committee appointments require an explicit source; a Yes vote alone does not establish either.