Skip to content
PolitiWardCalgary
‹ All Council votes

Recorded votes on CPC2020-0596

Main motion at the Combined Meeting of Council, July 20, 2020. Carried 11–4.

Result
Carried 11–4
Margin +7
Absent
0
Meeting
Jul 20, 2020
Combined Meeting of Council
Topic
Planning & land use
Keyword-derived
Kind
Main motion

Resolution

Council minutes, roll call. Source

That with respect to Report CPC2020-0596, the following be adopted: That Council: 1. Refuse the proposed amendment to the Hounsfield Heights/Briar Hill Area Redevelopment Plan (Attachment 2); 2. Refuse the proposed redesignation of 0.09 hectares ± (0.23 acres ±) located at 1922 and 1924 – 10 Avenue NW (Plan 1911453, Block 15, Lots 27 and 28) from Residential – Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential – Contextual Narrow Parcel One Dwelling (R￾C1N) District; and 3. Abandon Proposed Bylaws 29P2020 and 83D2020.

Seats
YesNoAbsent (recorded)No vote recorded
Seats run Mayor, then Wards 1–14. Text and named votes from the confirmed Council minutes (linked above, at the source page).

How each member voted

SeatMemberVote
MayorNaheed NenshiNo
Ward 1Ward SutherlandYes
Ward 2Joe MaglioccaYes
Ward 3Jyoti GondekNo
Ward 4Sean ChuYes
Ward 5George ChahalNo
Ward 6Jeff DavisonYes
Ward 7Druh FarrellNo
Ward 8Evan WoolleyYes
Ward 9Gian-Carlo CarraYes
Ward 10Ray JonesYes
Ward 11Jeromy FarkasYes
Ward 12Shane KeatingYes
Ward 13Diane Colley-UrquhartYes
Ward 14Peter DemongYes
A roll call from the minutes. A member not listed was absent or did not vote; the minutes do not always say which.

Recorded votes on CPC2020-0596

2 votes
MeetingMotionResult
Jul 20, 2020
Combined Meeting of Council
Bylaw reading
Adopt, by bylaw, the proposed amendment to the Hounsfield Heights/Briar Hill Area Redevelopment Plan (Attachment 2); and 2. Give three readings to the Proposed Bylaw 29P2020. 3. Adopt, by bylaw, th…
Defeated 7–8
Jul 20, 2020 (this vote)
Combined Meeting of Council
Main motion
Refuse the proposed amendment to the Hounsfield Heights/Briar Hill Area Redevelopment Plan (Attachment 2); 2. Refuse the proposed redesignation of 0.09 hectares ± (0.23 acres ±) located at 1922 and…
Carried 11–4
Amendments, referrals and the main motion on the same report, oldest first.