Non-market homes, housing supports and the City's housing strategy: distinguish funding decisions from homes actually completed. People are shown across their recorded careers unless dates are set.
Reviewed decisions that provide a specific financial or tax benefit for non-market housing. A vote records a choice on that proposal, not an estimate of affordability outcomes or an overall housing ideology.
Policy positions
15 rows| Person | Score (0–100) | Independent decisions | Remove-one low | Remove-one high | Evidence status | First vote | Last vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myke Atkinson | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Andre Chabot | 75 | 4 | 66.6666666667 | 100 | Mixed choices | Jan 28, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Harrison Clark | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Raj Dhaliwal | 100 | 4 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Jan 28, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Jeromy Farkas | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Mike Jamieson | 33.3333333333 | 3 | 0 | 50 | Mixed choices | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Landon Johnston | 33.3333333333 | 3 | 0 | 50 | Mixed choices | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| DJ Kelly | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Dan McLean | 50 | 4 | 33.3333333333 | 66.6666666667 | Mixed choices | Jan 28, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| John Pantazopoulos | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Nathaniel Schmidt | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Kim Tyers | 33.3333333333 | 3 | 0 | 50 | Mixed choices | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Rob Ward | 66.6666666667 | 3 | 50 | 100 | Mixed choices | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Jennifer Wyness | 75 | 4 | 66.6666666667 | 100 | Mixed choices | Jan 28, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
| Andrew Yule | 100 | 3 | 100 | 100 | Reviewed position | Dec 1, 2025 | Jul 28, 2026 |
Council considered the updated Home is Here strategy for 2026–2030.
Outcome: Council adopted the refresh. The resolution alone does not establish implementation or the direction of every policy change.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Council authorized the NMLS #6 transactions and required later public reporting of City land contributions and committed housing units.
Outcome: The package passed 11–4. The reviewed public records do not establish closed transactions, prices, subsidy amounts or completed homes.
City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Council gave final reading to Bylaw 11B2025, the affordable housing construction borrowing authority initially presented with the Calgary Housing financing package.
Outcome: The final reading carried unanimously. Borrowing authority permits financing; it does not show that all authorized funds were drawn or homes completed.
City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Council provided a Housing Land Fund contribution toward Calgary Housing's acquisition of a private-sector-built apartment building for up to 176 permanent mixed-income homes in Ward 4.
Outcome: The confirmed minutes record 15 Yes votes. Funding approval does not establish a closed acquisition or completed and occupied homes.
Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026A 2026 budget amendment changed downtown conversion funding and allocated $10 million to the Downtown Non-Market Office Conversion Program.
Outcome: The amendment carried 8–7. An allocation is not proof that conversions or homes were completed.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026The proposal established property-tax exemptions for eligible non-market housing held by non-profit organizations and mitigation while qualifying properties were being built or renovated.
Outcome: Council adopted the package. The vote establishes the policy approval, not the number of homes later produced.
City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Council considered a housing strategy package covering City land, non-market housing, conversion incentives, permissions and tenant supports.
Outcome: The strategy package carried 12–3. Funding and land-use changes requiring later approval were still to return to Council.
Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026| Date | Person | Decision | Recorded vote | Meaning and scoring rationale | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 22, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | No | Reject this refreshed strategy; the vote alone does not explain which actions the member disputed. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | Yes | Approve the refreshed housing strategy. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Dan McLean | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | No | Reject this refreshed strategy; the vote alone does not explain which actions the member disputed. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | Yes | Approve the refreshed housing strategy. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | Yes | Approve the refreshed housing strategy. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | No | Reject this refreshed strategy; the vote alone does not explain which actions the member disputed. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | Yes | Approve the refreshed housing strategy. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | Yes | Approve the refreshed housing strategy. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | No | Reject this refreshed strategy; the vote alone does not explain which actions the member disputed. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | No | Reject this refreshed strategy; the vote alone does not explain which actions the member disputed. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | No | Reject this refreshed strategy; the vote alone does not explain which actions the member disputed. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | Yes | Approve the refreshed housing strategy. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | Yes | Approve the refreshed housing strategy. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | Yes | Approve the refreshed housing strategy. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Sep 22, 2026 | Rob Ward | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy | Yes | Approve the refreshed housing strategy. This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | Context / unscored |
Jul 28, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Dan McLean | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | No | Reject this particular transaction-and-disclosure package; motives and views on other housing proposals are not established. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | No | Reject this particular transaction-and-disclosure package; motives and views on other housing proposals are not established. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | No | Reject this particular transaction-and-disclosure package; motives and views on other housing proposals are not established. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | No | Reject this particular transaction-and-disclosure package; motives and views on other housing proposals are not established. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jul 28, 2026 | Rob Ward | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round | Yes | Authorize the recommended transactions and disclosure requirements. The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Dan McLean | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Dan McLean | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | No | Reject this borrowing bylaw at final reading, while leaving other financing approaches possible. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 27, 2026 | Rob Ward | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | Context / unscored |
Jan 27, 2026 | Rob Ward | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction | Yes | Pass the final reading of the authority to borrow up to $87.525 million for the Calgary Housing capital portfolio. The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | Context / unscored |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 17, 2025 Meeting began Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition | Yes | Approve the specified $10 million acquisition contribution. The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | No | Reject this allocation amendment; it does not establish opposition to all downtown housing. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | Yes | Approve the stated reallocation and non-market conversion allocation. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Dan McLean | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | No | Reject this allocation amendment; it does not establish opposition to all downtown housing. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | Yes | Approve the stated reallocation and non-market conversion allocation. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | Yes | Approve the stated reallocation and non-market conversion allocation. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | No | Reject this allocation amendment; it does not establish opposition to all downtown housing. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | Yes | Approve the stated reallocation and non-market conversion allocation. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | Yes | Approve the stated reallocation and non-market conversion allocation. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | No | Reject this allocation amendment; it does not establish opposition to all downtown housing. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | No | Reject this allocation amendment; it does not establish opposition to all downtown housing. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | No | Reject this allocation amendment; it does not establish opposition to all downtown housing. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | Yes | Approve the stated reallocation and non-market conversion allocation. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | Yes | Approve the stated reallocation and non-market conversion allocation. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | Yes | Approve the stated reallocation and non-market conversion allocation. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Dec 1, 2025 | Rob Ward | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions | No | Reject this allocation amendment; it does not establish opposition to all downtown housing. The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Courtney Walcott | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Dan McLean | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Evan Spencer | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jasmine Mian | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Jyoti Gondek | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Kourtney Penner | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sean Chu | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Sonya Sharp | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Jan 28, 2025 | Terry Wong | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing | Yes | Approve the exemption bylaw and related mitigation policy, including the amended eligibility threshold. This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | Reviewed policy choice |
Sep 16, 2023 | Andre Chabot | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Courtney Walcott | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Dan McLean | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | No | Reject this strategy package at this vote; a No does not identify which of its many provisions the member opposed. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Evan Spencer | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Jasmine Mian | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Jennifer Wyness | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Jyoti Gondek | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Kourtney Penner | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Peter Demong | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | No | Reject this strategy package at this vote; a No does not identify which of its many provisions the member opposed. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Raj Dhaliwal | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Richard Pootmans | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Sean Chu | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | No | Reject this strategy package at this vote; a No does not identify which of its many provisions the member opposed. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Sonya Sharp | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
Sep 16, 2023 | Terry Wong | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy | Yes | Approve the amended strategy package and its implementation and reporting directions. This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Context / unscored |
| Date / precision | Person | Record type | Choice or statement | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Outcome not verified | Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned. | Milestone source |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · No This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Approve the refreshed 2026–2030 housing strategy · Yes This vote is explained as a specific decision and is not included in an issue spectrum. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · No The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · No The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · No The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · No The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize the sixth non-market housing land-disposition round · Yes The confirmed agenda identifies the approval as NMLS #6. CP2019-02 defines the programme as below-market City-land transfers to non-profit housing providers, and the public resolution expressly recognizes a City land contribution and committed non-market units. Score only the reviewed programme authorization; exact terms and member motives remain unknown. | City Council policy CP2019-02: Non-Market Housing Land Disposition · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · No The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The final financing package includes several housing bylaws; its repeated reading is contextual. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading package explicitly identifies this bylaw as financing construction of affordable housing. Final reading is the scored choice. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Allocate $10 million for a Ward 4 mixed-income housing acquisition · Yes The resolution explicitly allocates funding for Calgary Housing's mixed-income acquisition. It must share a conservative Calgary Housing expansion weight with the existing borrowing case because that linked financing portfolio includes an acquisition and cannot be proved independent. | Calgary Housing, December 18, 2025: acquisition contribution and expansion financing · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Authorize borrowing for affordable housing construction · Yes The first-reading report identifies the purpose and maximum authority for Bylaw 11B2025; it is not another scored decision. | City report C2026-0090: defined affordable-housing borrowing and on-lending · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 8, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Vote explanation | Supported keeping conversion incentives while redirecting some funding to affordable housing, balancing downtown recovery with affordability concerns. | Yule budget explanation, December 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · No The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Andrew Yule | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · Yes The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · No The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | DJ Kelly | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · Yes The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Harrison Clark | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · Yes The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · No The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · Yes The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | John Pantazopoulos | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · Yes The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Kim Tyers | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · No The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Landon Johnston | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · No The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · No The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Myke Atkinson | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · Yes The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Nathaniel Schmidt | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · Yes The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · Yes The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Rob Ward | Recorded vote | Allocate funding for non-market downtown conversions · No The recorded amendment expressly allocates $10 million to non-market conversions. Other amendments to this same budget share its scoring group. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| December 2025 | Mike Jamieson | Vote explanation | Opposed municipal office-conversion subsidies, questioning their payback and lack of guaranteed low-income homes, and preferring reliance on market investment. | Jamieson budget rationale, pages 2–3 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Stated position | Proposed a renter-support office, an acquisition fund for at-risk rental buildings, and more predictable support for nonprofit housing. | Farkas: housing policy brief, June 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jun 18, 2025 | Jeromy Farkas | Campaign commitment | Create a City office offering renters legal information, mediation and support. | Farkas: housing policy brief, June 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Tax exemptions for non-profit non-market housing · Yes This package explicitly grants a financial benefit to eligible non-profit non-market housing. | City Clerk's Council and Committee Votes · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Ariana Kippers | Stated position | Supported exploring more purpose-built student housing. | CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Brian Thiessen | Stated position | Supported exploring more purpose-built student housing. | CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Andre Chabot | Stated position | Supported nonprofit land leases and City mixed-market housing, supplemented by senior-government funding and faster approvals. | Question 7 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| 2025 | Heather McRae | Stated position | Supported exploring more purpose-built student housing. | CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2025 | Landon Johnston | Stated position | Supported temporary crisis help and supportive housing, while opposing permanent subsidies and favouring City land leases. | Question 7 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| 2025 | Larry R Heather | Stated position | Opposed exploring more purpose-built student housing. | CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| 2024 | Dan McLean | Vote explanation | Opposed the temporary-housing amendment because he wanted clearer goals, site information and assurance of neighbouring-community consultation. | McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Andre Chabot | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Courtney Walcott | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Dan McLean | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · No This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Evan Spencer | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Gian-Carlo Carra | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Jasmine Mian | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Jennifer Wyness | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Jyoti Gondek | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Kourtney Penner | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Peter Demong | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · No This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Raj Dhaliwal | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Richard Pootmans | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Sean Chu | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · No This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Sonya Sharp | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Sep 16, 2023 | Terry Wong | Recorded vote | Approve the Home is Here housing strategy · Yes This strategy package combines non-market financial support with market-housing, zoning, tenant and reporting policies. A Yes supports the package; a No cannot identify opposition to its non-market component. Retain explanatory evidence without a narrow financial-support score. | Confirmed 2023 Council minutes, September 16, pages 431–434 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Jun 6, 2023 | Jennifer Wyness | Vote explanation | Opposed immediately adopting the housing taskforce omnibus package, favouring committee scrutiny of spending, jurisdiction and parking while supporting broader housing permissions. | Wyness signed rationale, June 6, 2023 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026 |
| Undated source | Myke Atkinson | Stated position | Supported non-market housing, community land trusts and a landlord licensing program to improve rental standards. | Atkinson: campaign priorities (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
| Undated source | Harrison Clark | Stated position | Supported prioritizing surplus City land for non-market housing, co-operatives and Indigenous-led housing. | Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026 |
Supported keeping conversion incentives while redirecting some funding to affordable housing, balancing downtown recovery with affordability concerns.
Yule budget explanation, December 8, 2025 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds housing coverage through the stated funding compromise; does not repeat a general pro-housing campaign claim.
Opposed municipal office-conversion subsidies, questioning their payback and lack of guaranteed low-income homes, and preferring reliance on market investment.
Jamieson budget rationale, pages 2–3 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an explicit issue-specific voting explanation for an uncovered current member; the report is signed December 2025, so only month precision is assigned.
Proposed a renter-support office, an acquisition fund for at-risk rental buildings, and more predictable support for nonprofit housing.
Farkas: housing policy brief, June 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Adds tenant protection and acquisition proposals, which differ from zoning permissions and do not establish delivery.
Supported exploring more purpose-built student housing.
CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A named candidate’s original answer to the same student-housing question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. It contributes no spectrum score.
Supported exploring more purpose-built student housing.
CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A named candidate’s original answer to the same student-housing question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. It contributes no spectrum score.
Supported nonprofit land leases and City mixed-market housing, supplemented by senior-government funding and faster approvals.
Question 7 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an independent issue and concrete policy choice for a current member with no existing statements.
Supported exploring more purpose-built student housing.
CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A named candidate’s original answer to the same student-housing question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. It contributes no spectrum score.
Supported temporary crisis help and supportive housing, while opposing permanent subsidies and favouring City land leases.
Question 7 response · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds an independent issue and concrete policy choice for a current member with no existing statements.
Opposed exploring more purpose-built student housing.
CSA: 2025 candidate survey · reviewed Oct 29, 2026A named candidate’s original answer to the same student-housing question supports comparison, including candidates without Council votes. It contributes no spectrum score.
Opposed the temporary-housing amendment because he wanted clearer goals, site information and assurance of neighbouring-community consultation.
McLean 2024 newsletter, page 2 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds first issue coverage for an uncovered current member from his signed 2024 newsletter; layout timestamps are not treated as publication dates.
Opposed immediately adopting the housing taskforce omnibus package, favouring committee scrutiny of spending, jurisdiction and parking while supporting broader housing permissions.
Wyness signed rationale, June 6, 2023 · reviewed Oct 30, 2026Adds a distinct housing-process explanation with qualified support; deliberately does not attribute this June document to September's later housing-strategy adoption.
Supported non-market housing, community land trusts and a landlord licensing program to improve rental standards.
Atkinson: campaign priorities (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Records non-market and rental-standard proposals beyond the residential-permissions spectrum. The source’s missing date is preserved.
Supported prioritizing surplus City land for non-market housing, co-operatives and Indigenous-led housing.
Clark: policy guideline (undated) · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Records the preferred use and recipients of surplus land, distinct from an actual land-disposition authorization.
Create a City office offering renters legal information, mediation and support.
Farkas: housing policy brief, June 18, 2025 · reviewed Oct 29, 2026Delivery has not been established by the curated evidence; this is not a finding that the commitment was abandoned.
Milestone source